| Literature DB >> 35048976 |
Fanny Sampurno1, Christoph Kowalski2, Sarah E Connor3, Anissa V Nguyen3, Àngels Pont Acuña4, Chi-Fai Ng5, Claire Foster6, Günter Feick7, Olatz Garin Boronat4, Sebastian Dieng8, Silvana Brglevska9, Stephanie Ferrante10, Steven Leung5, Paul Villanti9, Caroline M Moore11, Ian D Graham12, Jeremy L Millar1, Mark S Litwin13, Nathan Papa1.
Abstract
Since 2017, the TrueNTH Global Registry (TNGR) has aimed to drive improvement in patient outcomes for individuals with localized prostate cancer by collating data from healthcare institutions across 13 countries. As TNGR matures, a systematic evaluation of existing processes and documents is necessary to evaluate whether the registry is operating as intended. The main supporting documents: protocol and data dictionary, were comprehensively reviewed in a series of meetings over a 10-month period by an international working group. In parallel, individual consultations with local institutions regarding a benchmarking quality-of-care report were conducted. Four consensus areas for improvement emerged: updating operational definitions, appraisal of the recruitment process, refinement of data elements, and improvement of data quality and reporting. Recommendations presented were drawn from our collective experience and accumulated knowledge in operating an international registry. These can be readily generalized to other health-related reporting programs beyond clinical registries.Entities:
Keywords: audit and feedback; collaborative working group; documentation; international clinical quality registry; process evaluation; shared-learning
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35048976 PMCID: PMC9006702 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc ISSN: 1067-5027 Impact factor: 4.497