Literature DB >> 27852198

Clinical quality registries have the potential to drive improvements in the appropriateness of care.

Nick Wilcox1, John J McNeil2.   

Abstract

The provision of timely, relevant and reliable information on patient care to clinicians has been shown to drive improvements in health care quality. Well constructed clinical quality registries collect and report information on both the appropriateness of care (process) in keeping with clinical practice guidelines and the effectiveness of care (outcomes). Notwithstanding the successful establishment of several new registries and improvements in established registries, barriers persist for clinical groups wishing to improve the quality of information and level of participation in registries in Australia. To address these barriers, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care has developed the Framework for Australian Clinical Quality Registries. The Framework describes a mechanism by which government jurisdictions and private hospital groups can authorise and secure record-level data, within high priority clinical domains, to measure, monitor and report the appropriateness and effectiveness of health care. The provision of benchmarked information back to clinicians on the appropriateness and outcomes of care is expected to improve adherence to evidence-based practice and drive improvement in outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27852198     DOI: 10.5694/mja15.00921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  20 in total

Review 1.  Observational studies and their utility for practice.

Authors:  Julia Fm Gilmartin-Thomas; Danny Liew; Ingrid Hopper
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Inter-hospital transfers and door-to-balloon times for STEMI: a single centre cohort study.

Authors:  René Forsyth; Zhong-Hua Sun; Christopher Reid; Rachael Moorin
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 3.  Outcomes collected in female pelvic floor surgical procedure registries and databases: a scoping review.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Justin O Daly; Joanne Dean; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Knowledge and insights from a maturing international clinical quality registry.

Authors:  Fanny Sampurno; Christoph Kowalski; Sarah E Connor; Anissa V Nguyen; Àngels Pont Acuña; Chi-Fai Ng; Claire Foster; Günter Feick; Olatz Garin Boronat; Sebastian Dieng; Silvana Brglevska; Stephanie Ferrante; Steven Leung; Paul Villanti; Caroline M Moore; Ian D Graham; Jeremy L Millar; Mark S Litwin; Nathan Papa
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Risk-adjustment of diabetes health outcomes improves the accuracy of performance benchmarking.

Authors:  Eleanor Danek; Arul Earnest; Natalie Wischer; Sofianos Andrikopoulos; Anthony Pease; Natalie Nanayakkara; Sophia Zoungas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR): a clinical quality registry to monitor and improve care in upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Ashika D Maharaj; Jennifer F Holland; Ri O Scarborough; Sue M Evans; Liane J Ioannou; Wendy Brown; Daniel G Croagh; Charles H C Pilgrim; James G Kench; Lara R Lipton; Trevor Leong; John J McNeil; Mehrdad Nikfarjam; Ahmad Aly; Paul R Burton; Paul A Cashin; Julie Chu; Cuong P Duong; Peter Evans; David Goldstein; Andrew Haydon; Michael W Hii; Brett P F Knowles; Neil D Merrett; Michael Michael; Rachel E Neale; Jennifer Philip; Ian W T Porter; Marty Smith; John Spillane; Peter P Tagkalidis; John R Zalcberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Defining Quality Indicators for Breast Device Surgery: Using Registries for Global Benchmarking.

Authors:  Husna Begum; Swarna Vishwanath; Michelle Merenda; Mark Tacey; Nicola Dean; Elisabeth Elder; Marc Mureau; Ron Bezic; Pamela Carter; Rodney D Cooter; Anand Deva; Arul Earnest; Michael Higgs; Howard Klein; Mark Magnusson; Colin Moore; Hinne Rakhorst; Christobel Saunders; Birgit Stark; Ingrid Hopper
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-08-19

8.  Establishing the acceptability of a brief patient reported outcome measure and feasibility of implementing it in a breast device registry - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sze Ng; Maggie Kirkman; Jane Fisher; Andrea Pusic; Emily Parker; Rodney D Cooter; Elisabeth Elder; Colin Moore; John McNeil; Ingrid Hopper
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-22

9.  Review of response rates over time in registry-based studies using patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Katherine Wang; Cathrine N Eftang; Rune Bruhn Jakobsen; Asbjørn Årøen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Development of a percutaneous coronary intervention patient level composite measure for a clinical quality registry.

Authors:  Darshini Ayton; Sze-Ee Soh; Renata Morello; Susannah Ahern; Arul Earnest; Angela Brennan; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Susan Evans; Christopher Reid; Rasa Ruseckaite; John McNeil
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.