Literature DB >> 31096298

Evaluation of Multicenter Registry Data.

Sebastian P Schraven1, Robert Mlynski1.   

Abstract

A registry actively documents and standardizes patient data on pre-defined questions. The term "register" emphasizes the data-holding aspect with the aim of describing epidemiological relationships and differences, supporting quality assurance and improvement, as well as clinical research. The evaluation of efficacy in the medical care routine, the monitoring of patient safety as well as economic evaluation and minimum quantity research are further tasks of registries. Patients and reporting institutions determine the quality of registries through completeness and high data validity. This must be taken into account when designing, financing and operating a registry. The analysis of potentially confounding or effect modifying variables is of significant importance for the evaluation of multi-center data from registers. Regular feedback to reporting institutions, patient information, public announcements and scientific publications as well as compliance with data protection regulations increase the transparency of the register. Otorhinolaryngology has few points of contact with registries. An exception is the integration into the cancer registry and the newborn hearing screening registry, which is currently under construction. The great variety of measurable outcome parameters in otorhinolaryngology, such as in otology, phoniatrics, rhinology, allergology, etc., forms the basis for various potential registers. Clinical questions, prevention measures, quality assurance, health care research and recommendations for health policy would be scientifically sound and evidence-based. Eigentümer und
Copyright ©Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31096298     DOI: 10.1055/a-0806-0971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  2 in total

1.  Knowledge and insights from a maturing international clinical quality registry.

Authors:  Fanny Sampurno; Christoph Kowalski; Sarah E Connor; Anissa V Nguyen; Àngels Pont Acuña; Chi-Fai Ng; Claire Foster; Günter Feick; Olatz Garin Boronat; Sebastian Dieng; Silvana Brglevska; Stephanie Ferrante; Steven Leung; Paul Villanti; Caroline M Moore; Ian D Graham; Jeremy L Millar; Mark S Litwin; Nathan Papa
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Quality control in cochlear implant therapy: clinical practice guidelines and registries in European countries.

Authors:  A Loth; C Vazzana; M Leinung; D Guderian; C Issing; U Baumann; T Stöver
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.