Literature DB >> 35044501

Foraging costs drive within-colony spatial segregation in shearwaters from two contrasting environments in the North Atlantic Ocean.

Jorge M Pereira1,2, Jaime A Ramos3, Nathalie Almeida3,4, Pedro M Araújo3,5, Filipe R Ceia3, Pedro Geraldes6, Ana M Marques3, Diana M Matos3, Isabel Rodrigues3,4, Ivo Dos Santos3, Vitor H Paiva3.   

Abstract

Foraging spatial segregation is frequent in central-place foragers during the breeding season, but very few studies have investigated foraging spatial segregation between adjacent sub-colonies. Here, we assessed for within-colony differences in the at-sea distribution, habitat use, trophic ecology and chick growth data of two Calonectris colonies differing in size, and breeding in two different environments in the North Atlantic Ocean. For this, we GPS tracked 52 Cory's shearwaters (Calonectris borealis) breeding in 2 small sub-colonies at Berlenga Island (Portugal) and 59 Cape Verde shearwaters (Calonectris edwardsii) breeding in 2 sub-colonies differing greatly in size at Raso Islet (Cabo Verde), over 2 consecutive breeding seasons (2017-2018), during chick-rearing. Cory's shearwaters from the two sub-colonies at Berlenga Island broadly overlapped in repeatedly used foraging patches close to the colony. In contrast, the foraging distribution of Cape Verde shearwaters was partially segregated in the colony surroundings, but overlapped at distant foraging areas off the west coast of Africa. Despite spatial segregation close to the colony, Cape Verde shearwaters from both sub-colonies departed in similar directions, foraged in similar habitats and exhibited mostly short trips within the archipelago of Cabo Verde. These results, corroborated with similar trophic ecology and chick growth rates between sub-colonies, support the idea that foraging spatial segregation in the colony surroundings was not likely driven by interference competition or directional bias. We suggest that high-quality prey patches are able to shape travel costs and foraging distribution of central-place foragers from neighbouring sub-colonies.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calonectris; Central-place foraging; Resource sharing; Sub-colony; Travel cost

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35044501     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05109-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  The ecological causes of individual specialisation.

Authors:  Márcio S Araújo; Daniel I Bolnick; Craig A Layman
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Behavioural mapping of a pelagic seabird: combining multiple sensors and a hidden Markov model reveals the distribution of at-sea behaviour.

Authors:  Ben Dean
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Individual-Level Memory Is Sufficient to Create Spatial Segregation among Neighboring Colonies of Central Place Foragers.

Authors:  Geert Aarts; Evert Mul; John Fieberg; Sophie Brasseur; Jan A van Gils; Jason Matthiopoulos; Louise Riotte-Lambert
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Spatial foraging segregation by close neighbours in a wide-ranging seabird.

Authors:  Filipe R Ceia; Vitor H Paiva; Ricardo S Ceia; Sandra Hervías; Stefan Garthe; João C Marques; Jaime A Ramos
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A model of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) habitat and movement in the oceanic North Pacific.

Authors:  Melanie Abecassis; Inna Senina; Patrick Lehodey; Philippe Gaspar; Denise Parker; George Balazs; Jeffrey Polovina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expectation-Maximization Binary Clustering for Behavioural Annotation.

Authors:  Joan Garriga; John R B Palmer; Aitana Oltra; Frederic Bartumeus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Varying foraging patterns in response to competition? A multicolony approach in a generalist seabird.

Authors:  Anna-Marie Corman; Bettina Mendel; Christian C Voigt; Stefan Garthe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Spatial segregation of home ranges between neighbouring colonies in a diurnal raptor.

Authors:  Jacopo G Cecere; Salvatore Bondì; Stefano Podofillini; Simona Imperio; Matteo Griggio; Egidio Fulco; Andrea Curcio; Delphine Ménard; Ugo Mellone; Nicola Saino; Lorenzo Serra; Maurizio Sarà; Diego Rubolini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.