Literature DB >> 25307415

Spatial foraging segregation by close neighbours in a wide-ranging seabird.

Filipe R Ceia1, Vitor H Paiva, Ricardo S Ceia, Sandra Hervías, Stefan Garthe, João C Marques, Jaime A Ramos.   

Abstract

Breeding seabirds are central-place foragers and therefore exploit food resources most intensively nearer their colonies. When nesting aggregations are close to one another density-dependent competition is likely to be high, potentially promoting foraging segregation (i.e. neighbouring colonies may segregate to search for food in different areas). However, little is known about spatial segregation in foraging behaviour between closely adjacent colonies, particularly in species that are wide-ranging foragers. Here, we tested for foraging segregation between two sub-colonies of a wide-ranging seabird, Cory's shearwater Calonectris borealis, separated by only 2 km, on a small Island in the North Atlantic. During the 2010 chick-rearing period, 43 breeding adults of both sexes were simultaneously sampled at both sub-colonies. A GPS logger was deployed on each individual and removed after several foraging trips at sea. Blood samples (plasma and red blood cells) were collected from each tracked individual for stable isotope analysis. Results indicated partial spatial segregation between the two sub-colonies during local foraging trips (i.e. those of ≤1 day duration and 216 km from the colony) accounting for 84.2% of all trips recorded. The location of the breeding sub-colony influenced the direction of travel of birds during local trips resulting in sub-colony-specific foraging areas. Although the oceanographic conditions associated with the foraging range of the two sub-colonies differed, no differences were found in the habitat exploited and in their estimated diets. This suggests that birds concentrated their feeding activity in patches of similar habitat and prey during the chick-rearing period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25307415     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3109-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Ecology. Seabirds--individuals in colonies.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Space partitioning without territoriality in gannets.

Authors:  Ewan D Wakefield; Thomas W Bodey; Stuart Bearhop; Jez Blackburn; Kendrew Colhoun; Rachel Davies; Ross G Dwyer; Jonathan A Green; David Grémillet; Andrew L Jackson; Mark J Jessopp; Adam Kane; Rowena H W Langston; Amélie Lescroël; Stuart Murray; Mélanie Le Nuz; Samantha C Patrick; Clara Péron; Louise M Soanes; Sarah Wanless; Stephen C Votier; Keith C Hamer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Foraging segregation and genetic divergence between geographically proximate colonies of a highly mobile seabird.

Authors:  Anne E Wiley; Andreanna J Welch; Peggy H Ostrom; Helen F James; Craig A Stricker; Robert C Fleischer; Hasand Gandhi; Josh Adams; David G Ainley; Fern Duvall; Nick Holmes; Darcy Hu; Seth Judge; Jay Penniman; Keith A Swindle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Using stable isotopes to study resource acquisition and allocation in procellariiform seabirds.

Authors:  Y Cherel; K A Hobson; H Weimerskirch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Evidence of intra-specific competition for food in a pelagic seabird.

Authors:  S Lewis; T N Sherratt; K C Hamer; S Wanless
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Isotopic discrimination between food and blood and feathers of captive penguins: implications for dietary studies in the wild.

Authors:  Yves Cherel; Keith A Hobson; Sami Hassani
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.247

7.  Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation.

Authors:  Andrew C Parnell; Richard Inger; Stuart Bearhop; Andrew L Jackson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; David Pinaud; Frédéric Pawlowski; Charles-André Bost
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Factors that influence assimilation rates and fractionation of nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes in avian blood and feathers.

Authors:  Stuart Bearhop; Susan Waldron; Stephen C Votier; Robert W Furness
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.247

10.  Albatrosses following fishing vessels: how badly hooked are they on an easy meal?

Authors:  José P Granadeiro; Richard A Phillips; Paul Brickle; Paulo Catry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Foraging costs drive within-colony spatial segregation in shearwaters from two contrasting environments in the North Atlantic Ocean.

Authors:  Jorge M Pereira; Jaime A Ramos; Nathalie Almeida; Pedro M Araújo; Filipe R Ceia; Pedro Geraldes; Ana M Marques; Diana M Matos; Isabel Rodrigues; Ivo Dos Santos; Vitor H Paiva
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Interpopulation resource partitioning of Lesser Frigatebirds and the influence of environmental context.

Authors:  Rowan Mott; Ashley Herrod; Rohan H Clarke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Foraging Behavior of Subantarctic Fur Seals Supports Efficiency of a Marine Reserve's Design.

Authors:  Stephen P Kirkman; Dawit G Yemane; Tarron Lamont; Michael A Meÿer; Pierre A Pistorius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Preferred, small-scale foraging areas of two Southern Ocean fur seal species are not determined by habitat characteristics.

Authors:  Mia Wege; P J Nico de Bruyn; Mark A Hindell; Mary-Anne Lea; Marthán N Bester
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.964

5.  Varying foraging patterns in response to competition? A multicolony approach in a generalist seabird.

Authors:  Anna-Marie Corman; Bettina Mendel; Christian C Voigt; Stefan Garthe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.