| Literature DB >> 35038237 |
Tilman A K Lühder1, Mario Chemnitz2, Henrik Schneidewind1, Erik P Schartner3, Heike Ebendorff-Heidepriem3, Markus A Schmidt1,4,5.
Abstract
Widely wavelength-tunable femtosecond light sources in a compact, robust footprint play a central role in many prolific research fields and technologies, including medical diagnostics, biophotonics, and metrology. Fiber lasers are on the verge in the development of such sources, yet widespan spectral tunability of femtosecond pulses remains a pivotal challenge. Dispersive wave generation, also known as Cherenkov radiation, offers untapped potentials to serve these demands. In this work, the concept of quasi-phase matching for multi-order dispersive wave formation with record-high spectral fidelity and femtosecond durations is exploited in selected, partially conventionally unreachable spectral regions. Versatile patterned sputtering is utilized to realize height-modulated high-index nano-films on exposed fiber cores to alter fiber dispersion to an unprecedented degree through spatially localized, induced resonances. Nonlinear optical experiments and simulations, as well as phase-mismatching considerations based on an effective dispersion, confirm the conversion process and reveal unique emission features, such as almost power-independent wavelength stability and femtosecond duration. This resonance-empowered approach is applicable to both fiber and on-chip photonic systems and paves the way to instrumentalize dispersive wave generation as a unique tool for efficient, coherent femtosecond multi-frequency conversion for applications in areas such as bioanalytics, life science, quantum technology, or metrology.Entities:
Keywords: dispersive wave; quasi phase-matching; soliton; tantalum pentoxide
Year: 2022 PMID: 35038237 PMCID: PMC8922130 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202103864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1The concept of quasi‐phase‐matched dispersive wave formation in exposed core fibers that include periodically modulated nanofilms. a) Illustration of the exposed core fiber coated with a height‐modulated nanofilm with a schematic of the transversal and longitudinal cross‐sections shown in (b) and (c). d) Schematic of the QPM energy conversion process (1. Energy transfer from the pump to the fundamental soliton. 2. Energy transfer to the DW0 and QPM peaks of order ‐3 < m < +3). e) Dependency of the spectral position of the QPM‐related features shown in (d) on the period length.
Figure 2Measured output spectrum for a sample with a nanofilm period of 1.4 mm and a thickness of 74.4 nm in comparison to simulations. a) Ensemble coherence of 20 simulated spectra (noise is defined in the main text). b) Experimental (red) and simulated (black, using the realistic alternating dispersion) output spectrum at maximum input power of 192 mW before the lens. The pink dotted line represents a simulation of the spectrum utilizing the longitudinally invariant effective dispersion calculated with Equation (2). The yellow regions highlight the extended spectral regions addressed by the QPM process. The central pump wavelength is represented by the vertical grey dash‐dotted line. On the right are measured mode images at three different wavelengths corresponding to DW0, soliton and first QPM peak (color of frames match to triangles in the plot). c) Left ordinate: Spectral distribution of phase mismatch for different values of q, calculated by Equation (1). The phase matching wavelengths are marked with blue circles and dashed lines. Right ordinate: effective GVD (calculated with Equation (2)) with the ZDW marked with a green diamond and a dotted line, dividing this spectral interval in a normal dispersive (ND, light turquoise background) and anomalous dispersive domain (AD, light red background).
Figure 3Simulated nonlinear pulse evolution for the periodic nanofilm‐enhanced ECF (period 1.4 mm, top row) in comparison to a fiber with corresponding effective constant dispersion (bottom row). a,c) Spatiospectral and b,d) spatiotemporal evolution of the simulated spectra (in dB) shown in Figure 2. e,f) Integrated normalized linear power evolution of the DW0 and QPM peaks marked and color‐matched in (a) and (c). In (e), the gray areas refer to the thick nano‐film regions. Please note that the curves in (e) and (f) are individually normalized and should not be compared in intensity.
Figure 4Simulated and experimental spectra at maximum input power (≈ 192 mW) for fibers with nano‐film periods (0.625 mm (a), 2.5 mm (b), 3.0 mm (c), details can be found in Table 1). Phase‐matching wavelengths calculated with Equation (1) are marked by dashed lines. Simulation of nano‐films with varying periods (d) and thicknesses (e) with otherwise constant parameters identical to the fiber of Figure 2 (peak power: 11.8 kW; nano‐film thickness: 74.4 nm; filling fraction: 52.1 %; fiber length: 40 mm). The color scale on the right is in units of dB.
Experimentally measured, simulation matched, and calculated parameters for all presented ECF samples
| Period |
| Fiber length |
|
| Loss |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [mm] | [mm] | [kW] | [nm] | [dB m−1] | [nm] | [mm] | [mm] | [mm] | |
| 0.625 | 0.588 | 34 | 8.5 | 70.8 | 10 | 1645 | 9.6 | 2.3 | 4.7 |
| 1.409 | 0.521 | 39 | 11.8 | 74.4 | 10 | 1675 | 18 | 1.6 | 5.3 |
| 2.494 | 0.511 | 36 | 7.7 | 68.8 | 10 | 1590 | 5.8 | 2.7 | 4.0 |
| 3.000 | 0.506 | 45 | 13.0 | 78.1 | 10 | 1690 | 106 | 1.4 | 12 |
L D, dispersive length; L NL, nonlinear length (as defined in ref. [65]); , fission length; ff, filling fraction; t, nanofilm thickness.
Measured;
Simulation matched;
Calculated.