| Literature DB >> 35038082 |
Parvind Singh1, Marianna Szaraz-Szeles1, Zoltan Mezei1, Sandor Barath1, Zsuzsanna Hevessy2.
Abstract
Unconventional T cells show distinct and unique features during antigen recognition as well as other immune responses. Their decrease in frequency is associated with various autoimmune disorders, allergy, inflammation, and cancer. The landscape frequency of the unconventional T cells altogether (iNKT, γδ T, and MAIT) is largely unestablished leading to various challenges affecting diagnosis and research in this field. In this study, we have established the age group-wise frequency of iNKT, γδ T, and MAIT cells altogether on a total of 203 healthy adult samples of the Caucasian population. The results revealed that iNKT cells were 0.095%, γδ T cells were 2.175%, and MAIT cells were 2.99% of the total T cell population. γδ and MAIT cell frequency is higher in younger age groups than elderly; however, there is no statistically significant difference in the frequency of iNKT cells. Furthermore, γδ and MAIT cells were negatively correlating with age, supporting immunosenescence, unlike iNKT cells. Our finding could be used for further age-wise investigation of various pathological conditions such as cancer and their prognosis, autoimmune diseases and their pathogenicity.Entities:
Keywords: Age dependent; Frequency; MAIT cells; Reference range; Unconventional T cells; iNKT cells; γδ T cells
Year: 2022 PMID: 35038082 PMCID: PMC8763133 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-022-00515-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Geroscience ISSN: 2509-2723 Impact factor: 7.581
Number of healthy adult population included in the study
| Age groups (years) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18–35 | 36–50 | 51–65 | 66–90 | |
| Total samples included ( | 56 | 77 | 52 | 18 |
| Mean age ± standard deviation | 28 ± 5 | 43 ± 4 | 57 ± 4 | 72 ± 4 |
Fig. 1Dot plots and gating strategies obtained from multicolor flow cytometric panel of peripheral blood of a healthy adult donor, which includes iNKT cells, γδ T cells, and MAIT cells; universally, doublets were excluded via gating singlets on FSC-A vs FSC-H dot plot, followed by WBCs were gated on FSC vs SSC dot plot, and later lymphocytes were gated on CD45 vs SSC. iNKT cells gating strategy: T cells were gated on CD3 vs SSC dot plot, followed by Vα24 + iNK T cells were gated as Vα24 vs CD3 dot plot, later iNKT cells were gated as 6B11 vs Vα24 (among T cells among WBC). MAIT cells gating strategy: T cells were gated on CD3 vs SSC dot plot, followed by CD3 vs CD161 dot plot were taken to visualize CD161 bright signal, later MAIT cells were gated as Vα7.2 vs CD161 dot plot (among T cells and among WBC). γδ T cells gating strategy: Vγ9 cells were gated on CD3 vs Vγ9 dot plot (among T cells and among WBC), followed by γδ T were gated on Vδ2 vs CD3 (among Vγ9 and among T cells) also γδ T cells were visualized on Vδ2 vs Vγ9 dot plot
Descriptive statistics of unconventional T cells obtained from total healthy adult PB samples of Caucasian population; data analyzed as a whole
| Method (equipment) | Parameter | Median (min–max) | 25–75% | 2.5–97.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematology analyzer | WBC (× 109/L) | 6.66 (3.76–12.35) | 5.86–7.77 | 4.59–10.62 |
| Lymphocytes (× 109/L) | 2.04 (0.97–4.91) | 1.71–2.42 | 1.08–3.39 | |
| Flow cytometer | T cell (% lymphocytes) | 69.78 (45.92–84.42) | 64.67–75.2 | 53.65–82.84 |
| iNKT cells (% T cell) | 0.095 (0.007–4.94) | 0.042–0.254 | 0.01–1.52 | |
| γδ T cell (% T cell) | 2.175 (0.078–16.09) | 1.163–4.31 | 0.31–11.94 | |
| MAIT cells (% T cell) | 2.99 (0.11–18.36) | 1.43–5.4 | 0.27–10.74 | |
| Dual platform | iNKT (cells/µL) | 1.3 (0.1–63.5) | 0.6–3.6 | 0.1–18.34 |
| γδ T cell (cells/µL) | 30 (1–249) | 17.75–63 | 4.07–158 | |
| MAIT (cells/µL) | 42 (2–261) | 18–76 | 4–181 |
Age group–wise descriptive statistics of unconventional T cells in healthy adult PB samples of Caucasian population
| Age groups | Method (equipment) | Parameter | Median (min–max) | 25–75% | 2.5–97.5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18–35 | Hematology analyzer | WBC (× 109/L) | 6.79 (3.76–12.24) | 5.88–7.83 | 3.91–11.49 |
| Lymphocytes (× 109/L) | 2.07 (1.02–4.91) | 1.778–2.465 | 1.04–4.24 | ||
| Flow cytometer | T cell (% lymphocytes) | 69.61 (49.93–83.53) | 66.19–72.25 | 53.86–82.94 | |
| iNKT cells (% T cell) | 0.136 (0.007–4.94) | 0.052–0.395 | 0.0074–4.47 | ||
| γδ T cell (% T cell) | 3.785 (0.685–16.09) | 1.97–5.938 | 0.80–14.56 | ||
| MAIT cells (% T cell) | 5.025 (0.67–11.91) | 3.038–7.218 | 0.793–11.39 | ||
| Dual platform | iNKT (cells/µL) | 2.0 (0.1–63.5) | 0.8–4.5 | 0.1–61.76 | |
| γδ T cell (cells/µL) | 56.5 (9–249) | 26.25–86.25 | 9.85–238 | ||
| MAIT (cells/µL) | 71 (10–183) | 43.75–98.75 | 12.98–177 | ||
| 36–50 | Hematology analyzer | WBC (× 109/L) | 6.66 (4.71–10.63) | 5.91–7.62 | 4.79–10.13 |
| Lymphocytes (× 109/L) | 2.13 (1.05–3.05) | 1.71–2.49 | 1.17–3.03 | ||
| Flow cytometer | T cell (% lymphocytes) | 70.86 (53.59–83.01) | 65.82–75.83 | 54.2–82.95 | |
| iNKT cells (% T cell) | 0.078 (0.01–2.60) | 0.041–0.199 | 0.011–1.98 | ||
| γδ T cell (% T cell) | 1.98 (0.11–11.97) | 1.02–3.315 | 0.263–10.59 | ||
| MAIT cells (% T cell) | 3.42 (0.3–18.36) | 1.555–5.02 | 0.404–13.2 | ||
| Dual platform | iNKT (cells/µL) | 1.1 (0.1–44.1) | 0.55–2.5 | 0.195–19.88 | |
| γδ T cell (cells/µL) | 28 (1–203) | 15–52.5 | 3.85–125 | ||
| MAIT (cells/µL) | 45 (5–261) | 23–77.5 | 5–224 | ||
| 51–65 | Hematology analyzer | WBC (× 109/L) | 6.77 (4.59–12.35) | 5.91–7.89 | 4.74–11.93 |
| Lymphocytes (× 109/L) | 2.04 (0.97–4) | 1.715–2.313 | 0.976–3.93 | ||
| Flow cytometer | T cell (% lymphocytes) | 67.79 (45.92–84.42) | 61.4–76.17 | 48.22–83.71 | |
| iNKT cells (% T cell) | 0.108 (0.011–1.152) | 0.039–0.208 | 0.012–0.994 | ||
| γδ T cell (% T cell) | 1.66 (0.078–7.23) | 0.95–2.86 | 0.153–6.98 | ||
| MAIT cells (% T cell) | 1.85 (0.11–10.59) | 0.642–2.378 | 0.13–10.29 | ||
| Dual platform | iNKT (cells/µL) | 1.15 (0.1–13.2) | 0.425–2.875 | 0.1–12.32 | |
| γδ T cell (cells/µL) | 23.5 (1–122) | 13–48.25 | 1.65–119 | ||
| MAIT (cells/µL) | 23.5 (2–102) | 7.25–42.25 | 2.32–100 | ||
| 66–90 | Hematology analyzer | WBC (× 109/L) | 6.31 (4.54–9.24) | 4.90–7.37 | 4.54–9.24 |
| Lymphocytes (× 109/L) | 1.72 (1.2–3.56) | 1.47–2.258 | 1.2–3.56 | ||
| Flow cytometer | T cell (% lymphocytes) | 69.81 (52.45–81) | 60.65–76.32 | 52.45–81 | |
| iNKT cells (% T cell) | 0.098 (0.011–0.816) | 0.024–0.159 | 0.011–0.816 | ||
| γδ T cell (% T cell) | 1.5 (0.11–15.32) | 0.77–2.765 | 0.11–15.32 | ||
| MAIT cells (% T cell) | 1.345 (0.2–13.2) | 0.34–2.403 | 0.2–13.2 | ||
| Dual platform | iNKT (cells/µL) | 1 (0.1–16) | 0.275–2.15 | 0.1–16 | |
| γδ T cell (cells/µL) | 20 (1–160) | 10–46 | 1–160 | ||
| MAIT (cells/µL) | 16.5 (2–211) | 4–28.75 | 2–211 |
Fig. 2Percentages and absolute numbers of iNKT, γδ, and MAIT cells in peripheral blood of healthy adult individuals 18–35-year-old compared to 36–50-, 51–65-, and 66–90-year-old; 36–50-year-old compared to 51–65 and 66–90; 51–65 compared to 66–90 years old. P values (Kruskal–Wallis test-Dunn multiple comparison) are indicated inside the graphics (*p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001)
Fig. 3Correlation between age and the percentages and absolute number of iNKT cells, γδ T cells, and MAIT cells in adult healthy population. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and p values are indicated inside the graphics