| Literature DB >> 35032330 |
Abstract
Each year, millions of central venous catheter insertions are performed in intensive care units worldwide. The usage of these indwelling devices is associated with a high risk of bacterial and fungal colonization, leading to the development of microbial consortia, namely biofilms. These sessile structures provide fungal cells with resistance to the majority of antifungals, environmental stress and host immune responses. Based on different guidelines, colonized/infected catheters should be removed and changed immediately in the case of Candida-related central line infections. However, catheter replacement is not feasible for all patient populations. An alternative therapeutic approach may be antifungal lock therapy, which has received high interest, especially in the last decade. This review summarizes the published Candida-related in vitro, in vivo data and case studies in terms of antifungal lock therapy. The number of clinical studies remains limited and further studies are needed for safe implementation of the antifungal lock therapy into clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Candidazzm321990; zzm321990Candida auriszzm321990; antifungal lock therapy; biofilm; candidaemia; catheter-associated infection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35032330 PMCID: PMC9306927 DOI: 10.1111/lam.13653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lett Appl Microbiol ISSN: 0266-8254 Impact factor: 2.813
In vivo result of antifungal lock therapy against various Candida species
| Reference |
| Animal/Model | Lock solution | Duration of therapy | Therapeutic success |
| Schinabeck |
| Rabbit CVC model | 10 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | 8 h per day for 7 days | 7/7 (100%) |
| 10 mg ml−1 FLU | 2/7 (29%) | ||||
| Shuford |
| Rabbit CVC model | 6·67 mg ml−1 CAS | 7 days | 16/16 (100%) |
| 3·33 mg ml−1 d‐AMD | 13/16 (81%) | ||||
| Mukherjee |
| Rabbit CVC model | 5 mg ml−1 ABLC | 4 h per day for 7 days | 6/6 (100%) |
| 5 mg ml−1 ABLC | 8 h per day for 7 days | 6/6 (100%) | |||
| Lazell |
| Murine CVC model | 0·25 mg l−1 CAS | 24 h | 4/6 (67%) |
| Basas |
| Rabbit CVC model | 5·5 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | 48 h | 3/10 (30%) |
| 3·3 mg ml−1 ANI | 5/8 (63%) | ||||
|
| 5·5 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | 1/6 (17%) | |||
| 3·3 mg ml−1 ANI | 8/11 (73%) | ||||
| Fujimoto and Takemoto ( |
| Murine CVC model | 2 mg l−1 daily lock L‐AMB + 5 mg kg−1 daily i.p. L‐AMB | 72 h | 7/7 (100%) |
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock MICA + 15 mg kg−1 daily i.p. MICA | 7/7 (100%) | ||||
|
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock L‐AMB + 5 mg kg−1 daily i.p. L‐AMB | 8/7 (88%) | |||
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock MICA + 15 mg kg−1 daily i.p. MICA | 8/8 (100%) | ||||
|
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock L‐AMB + 5 mg kg−1 daily i.p. L‐AMB | 6/5 (83%) | |||
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock MICA + 15 mg kg−1 daily i.p. MICA | 6/4 (67%) | ||||
|
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock L‐AMB + 5 mg kg−1 daily i.p. L‐AMB | 8/7 (88%) | |||
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock MICA + 15 mg kg−1 daily i.p. MICA | 8/4 (50%) | ||||
|
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock L‐AMB + 5 mg kg−1 daily i.p. L‐AMB | 6/6 (100%) | |||
| 2 mg l−1 daily lock MICA + 15 mg kg−1 daily i.p. MICA | 6/6 (100%) | ||||
| Salinas |
| Murine CVC model | 16 mg l−1 daily lock MICA + 1 mg kg−1 daily i.p. MICA | Treatment started at day 1, lasted 7 days, and was followed by 7 days of surveillance with no treatment | 8/6 (75%) |
| Basas |
| Rabbit CVC model | 5 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | 48 h | 10/5 (50%) |
| 3·33 mg ml−1 ANI | 10/4 (40%) | ||||
|
| 5 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | 6/5 (83%) | |||
| 3·33 mg ml−1 ANI | 6/5 (83%) | ||||
|
| 5 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | 14/3 (21%) | |||
| 3·33 mg ml−1 ANI | 11/7 (64%) | ||||
|
| 5 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | 7/2 (29%) | |||
| 3·33 mg ml−1 ANI | 8/8 (100%) |
Case reports of antifungal lock therapy against Candida species
| Reference | Patient(s) | Species | Lock solution | Systemic therapy | Duration of therapy | Therapeutic success |
| Johnson | 4‐yr‐old sex is unknown |
| 2 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | Unknown | 12 h twice a day for 10–14 days | 2/2 (100%) |
| 18‐yr‐old sex is unknown |
| 2 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | Unknown | 12 h twice a day for 10–14 days | ||
| Benoit | 30‐yr‐old female |
| 2·5 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | d‐AMB for three days then FLU for 4 days | 8–12 h/day for 15 days | 2/1 (50%) |
| 40‐yr‐old female |
| 2·5 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | FLU for three days | 6 h per day for 14 days | ||
|
| 2·5 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | d‐AMB for 1 day | 6 h per day for 14 days | |||
| Viale | 2‐yr‐old female |
| 2·5 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | d‐AMB for 7 days | 12 h per day for 14 days | 2/2 (100%) |
| 65‐yr‐old male |
| 2·5 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | FLU for 7 days | 12 h per day for 14 days | ||
| Castagnola | Infant |
| 2·67 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | L‐AMB for 14 days | 8 h per day for 14 days | 1/1 (100%) |
| Angel‐Moreno | 40‐yr‐old male |
| 5 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | Systemic FLU (no duration and dosage) | 6 h per day for 14 days | 1/1 (100%) |
| Wu and Lee ( | 13‐yr‐old female |
| 2·5 mg ml−1 d‐AMB | d‐AMB for 6 days then FLU (no duration and dosage) | 24 h per day for 20 days | 1/1 (100%) |
| Buckler | 17‐mo‐old female |
| 2·67 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | Systemic FLU for 5 days, which was changed to L‐AMB | 8 h per day for 7 to 16 days | 4/2 (50%) |
|
| ||||||
| 7‐yr‐old female |
| Systemic L‐AMB | 8 h per day for 17 days | |||
| 6‐mo‐old male |
| 8 h per day for 15 days | ||||
| 1‐yr‐old female |
| 8 h per day for 14 days | ||||
| Özdemir | 9‐yr‐old male |
| 3·3 mg ml−1 CAS | CAS + meropenem and teicoplanin | 12 h per day for 14 days | 1/1 (100%) |
| Blackwood | 8‐mo‐old male |
| 70% ethanol | Systemic FLU | 14 days | 3/3 (100%) |
| 8‐mo‐old female |
| Systemic VOR | ||||
| 5‐yr‐old male |
| Systemic FLU | ||||
| Paul DiMondi | 64‐yr‐old female |
| 2·67 mg ml−1 L‐AMB | MICA for 14 days | 24 h per day, change every 12 h, for 6 days | 1/1 (100%) |
| Piersigilli | Infant male |
| 70% ethanol combined with 5 mg l−1 MICA | 5 mg kg−1 L‐AMB then 10 mg kg−1 MICA | 12 h | 1/1 (100%) |
| Isgüder | 1·5‐yr‐old male |
| 3·33 mg ml−1 CAS | Systemic CAS | 12 h per day for 14 days | 1/0 (0%) |