Literature DB >> 26543157

Susceptibility of Candida albicans biofilms to caspofungin and anidulafungin is not affected by metabolic activity or biomass production.

Laura Judith Marcos-Zambrano1, Pilar Escribano2, Emilio Bouza3, Jesús Guinea4.   

Abstract

Micafungin is more active against biofilms with high metabolic activity; however, it is unknown whether this observation applies to caspofungin and anidulafungin and whether it is also dependent on the biomass production. We compare the antifungal activity of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin against preformed Candida albicans biofilms with different degrees of metabolic activity and biomass production from 301 isolates causing fungemia in patients admitted to Gregorio Marañon Hospital (January 2007 to September 2014). Biofilms were classified as having low, moderate, or high metabolic activity according XTT reduction assay or having low, moderate, or high biomass according to crystal violet assay. Echinocandin MICs for planktonic and sessile cells were measured using the EUCAST E.Def 7.2 procedure and XTT reduction assay, respectively. Micafungin showed the highest activity against biofilms classified according to the metabolic activity and biomass production (P < .001). The activity of caspofungin and anidulafungin was not dependent on the metabolic activity of the biofilm or the biomass production. These observations were confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. None of the echinocandins produced major changes in the structure of biofilms with low metabolic activity and biomass production when compared with the untreated biofilms. However, biofilm with high metabolic activity or high biomass production was considerably more susceptible to micafungin; this effect was not shown by caspofungin or anidulafungin.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EUCAST; Echinocandins; biofilm; micafungin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26543157     DOI: 10.1093/mmy/myv094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Mycol        ISSN: 1369-3786            Impact factor:   4.076


  5 in total

1.  In vitro activity of micafungin against biofilms of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis at different stages of maturation.

Authors:  Małgorzata Prażyńska; Tomasz Bogiel; Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Lack of efficacy of echinocandins against high metabolic activity biofilms of Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates.

Authors:  Danilo Yamamoto Thomaz; Marcia de Souza Carvalho Melhem; João Nobrega de Almeida Júnior; Gil Benard; Gilda Maria Barbaro Del Negro
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.476

3.  In vitro activities of antifungals alone and in combination with tigecycline against Candida albicans biofilms.

Authors:  Mayram Hacioglu; Ayse Seher Birteksoz Tan; Sibel Dosler; Nese Inan; Gulten Otuk
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 4.  Antifungal lock therapy: an eternal promise or an effective alternative therapeutic approach?

Authors:  R Kovács; L Majoros
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 5.  Gaining Insights from Candida Biofilm Heterogeneity: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Authors:  Ryan Kean; Christopher Delaney; Ranjith Rajendran; Leighann Sherry; Rebecca Metcalfe; Rachael Thomas; William McLean; Craig Williams; Gordon Ramage
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.