Ayesha Bharadwaj Das1, James Andrew Tranos2, Jin Zhang1, Youssef Zaim Wadghiri2, Sungheon Gene Kim. 1. From the Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College. 2. Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using 2 flip angles (FAs) with an ultrashort echo time during dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for estimation of plasma gadolinium (Gd) concentration without using a precontrast longitudinal relaxation time T1 (T10) measurement. METHODS: T1-weighted DCE-MRI experiments were carried out with C57BL/6J mice using the scan protocol with 2 FAs over 3 sequential segments during 1 scan. The data with 2 FAs were used to estimate T10 (T1T) during conversion of a time-intensity curve to the time-concentration curve. Three dosages of gadolinium-based contrast agent were used to achieve a wide range of variability in Gd concentrations when measured at 10 minutes postinjection: 0.05 mmol/kg (n = 6), 0.1 mmol/kg (n = 11), and 0.15 mmol/kg (n = 7). For comparison, the signal-to-concentration conversion was also conducted using the T10 measured from the precontrast scan (T1M) as well as a constant T10 (2.1 seconds) from the literature (T1C). The Gd concentrations ([Gd]) estimated using DCE-MRI data for the time of retro-orbital blood collection ([Gd]T1T, [Gd]T1M, and [Gd]T1C, respectively) were compared against the [Gd] of the blood samples measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ([Gd]MS). In addition, contrast kinetic model analysis was conducted on mice with GL261 brain tumors (n = 5) using the 3 different methods for T10. RESULTS: T1T strongly correlated with T1M (r = 0.81). [Gd]T1M and [Gd]T1T were significantly different from [Gd]T1C. [Gd]T1M and [Gd]T1T were in good agreement with [Gd]MS with strong correlations (mean percentage error ± standard deviation) of r = 0.70 (16% ± 56%) and r = 0.85 (15% ± 44%), respectively. In contrast, [Gd]T1C had a weak correlation of r = 0.52 with larger errors of 33% ± 24%. The contrast kinetic model parameters of GL261 brain tumors using T1T were not significantly different from those using T1M. CONCLUSIONS: This study substantiates the feasibility of using the 2-FA approach during DCE-MRI scan to estimate [Gd] in the plasma without using an extra scan to perform precontrast T1 measurements.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using 2 flip angles (FAs) with an ultrashort echo time during dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for estimation of plasma gadolinium (Gd) concentration without using a precontrast longitudinal relaxation time T1 (T10) measurement. METHODS: T1-weighted DCE-MRI experiments were carried out with C57BL/6J mice using the scan protocol with 2 FAs over 3 sequential segments during 1 scan. The data with 2 FAs were used to estimate T10 (T1T) during conversion of a time-intensity curve to the time-concentration curve. Three dosages of gadolinium-based contrast agent were used to achieve a wide range of variability in Gd concentrations when measured at 10 minutes postinjection: 0.05 mmol/kg (n = 6), 0.1 mmol/kg (n = 11), and 0.15 mmol/kg (n = 7). For comparison, the signal-to-concentration conversion was also conducted using the T10 measured from the precontrast scan (T1M) as well as a constant T10 (2.1 seconds) from the literature (T1C). The Gd concentrations ([Gd]) estimated using DCE-MRI data for the time of retro-orbital blood collection ([Gd]T1T, [Gd]T1M, and [Gd]T1C, respectively) were compared against the [Gd] of the blood samples measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ([Gd]MS). In addition, contrast kinetic model analysis was conducted on mice with GL261 brain tumors (n = 5) using the 3 different methods for T10. RESULTS: T1T strongly correlated with T1M (r = 0.81). [Gd]T1M and [Gd]T1T were significantly different from [Gd]T1C. [Gd]T1M and [Gd]T1T were in good agreement with [Gd]MS with strong correlations (mean percentage error ± standard deviation) of r = 0.70 (16% ± 56%) and r = 0.85 (15% ± 44%), respectively. In contrast, [Gd]T1C had a weak correlation of r = 0.52 with larger errors of 33% ± 24%. The contrast kinetic model parameters of GL261 brain tumors using T1T were not significantly different from those using T1M. CONCLUSIONS: This study substantiates the feasibility of using the 2-FA approach during DCE-MRI scan to estimate [Gd] in the plasma without using an extra scan to perform precontrast T1 measurements.
Authors: S Kim; L A Loevner; H Quon; A Kilger; E Sherman; G Weinstein; A Chalian; H Poptani Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: G M Conte; L Altabella; A Castellano; V Cuccarini; A Bizzi; M Grimaldi; A Costa; M Caulo; A Falini; N Anzalone Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sebastian Gassenmaier; Judith Herrmann; Dominik Nickel; Stephan Kannengiesser; Saif Afat; Ferdinand Seith; Rüdiger Hoffmann; Ahmed E Othman Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Philipp Backhaus; Florian Büther; Lydia Wachsmuth; Lynn Frohwein; Rebecca Buchholz; Uwe Karst; Klaus Schäfers; Sven Hermann; Michael Schäfers; Cornelius Faber Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bernard E Van Beers; Roland Materne; Laurence Annet; Laurent Hermoye; Christine Sempoux; Frank Peeters; Anne M Smith; Jacques Jamart; Yves Horsmans Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 4.668