Literature DB >> 33645949

Image Quality Improvement of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Iterative Denoising and Edge Enhancement.

Sebastian Gassenmaier1, Judith Herrmann1, Dominik Nickel2, Stephan Kannengiesser2, Saif Afat1, Ferdinand Seith1, Rüdiger Hoffmann1, Ahmed E Othman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a novel edge enhancement and iterative denoising algorithm in 1.5-T T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) gradient echo (GRE) magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen on image quality, noise levels, diagnostic confidence, and lesion detectability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent a clinically indicated magnetic resonance imaging with DCE imaging of the abdomen between June and August 2020 were included in this retrospective, monocentric, institutional review board-approved study. For DCE imaging, a series of 3 volume interpolated breath-hold examinations (VIBEs) was performed. The raw data of all DCE imaging studies were processed twice, once using standard reconstruction (DCES) and again using an edge enhancement and iterative denoising approach (DCEDE). All imaging studies were randomly reviewed by 2 radiologists independently regarding noise levels, arterial contrast, sharpness of vessels, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4, with 4 being the best. Furthermore, lesion detectability was evaluated using the same ranking system.
RESULTS: All 50 imaging studies were successfully reconstructed with both methods. Interreader agreement (Cohen κ) was substantial to perfect for both readers. Arterial contrast and sharpness of vessels were rated superior by both readers with a median of 4 in DCEDE versus a median of 3 in DCES (P < 0.001). Furthermore, noise levels as well as overall image quality were rated higher with a median of 4 in DCEDE compared with a median of 3 in DCES (P < 0.001). Lesion detectability was evaluated to be superior in DCEDE with a median of 4 versus DCES with a median of 3 (P < 0.001). Consequently, diagnostic confidence was also rated to be superior in DCEDE with a median of 4 versus DCES with a median of 3 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Iterative denoising and edge enhancement are feasible in DCE imaging of the abdomen providing superior arterial contrast, noise levels, and overall image quality. Furthermore, lesion detectability and diagnostic confidence were significantly improved using this novel reconstruction method. Further reduction of acquisition time might be possible via reduction of increased noise levels using this presented method.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33645949     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  3 in total

1.  Estimation of Contrast Agent Concentration in DCE-MRI Using 2 Flip Angles.

Authors:  Ayesha Bharadwaj Das; James Andrew Tranos; Jin Zhang; Youssef Zaim Wadghiri; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Injection rate of contrast medium affects diagnostic ability of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for endometrial carcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Donghui Xu; Aiping Jin; Yongqian Ge; Yanmei Zhang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-08

Review 3.  Deep Learning Applications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Has the Future Become Present?

Authors:  Sebastian Gassenmaier; Thomas Küstner; Dominik Nickel; Judith Herrmann; Rüdiger Hoffmann; Haidara Almansour; Saif Afat; Konstantin Nikolaou; Ahmed E Othman
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.