| Literature DB >> 35024950 |
Antonina Luca1, Roberto Monastero2, Calogero Edoardo Cicero1, Roberta Baschi3, Giulia Donzuso1, Giovanni Mostile1, Vincenzo Restivo4, Lucia Di Giorgi3, Maria Caccamo3, Mario Zappia1, Alessandra Nicoletti5.
Abstract
The association between dyslipidemia and cognitive performance in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients still needs to be clarified. Aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of possible associations between serum lipids fractions and executive dysfunction also exploring the sex-specific contribute of lipids level on cognition. Patients from the PACOS cohort, who underwent a complete serum lipid profile measures (total cholesterol-TC, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-LDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-HDL and triglycerides-TG) were selected. Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines of the National Cholesterol Education Program were used to classify normal/abnormal lipid fractions. Executive functioning was assessed with the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). Logistic regression was performed to assess associations between lipids fractions and FAB score. Correlations between lipids fractions and FAB score were explored. Sex-stratified analysis was performed. Three hundred and forty-eight PD patients (148 women; age 66.5 ± 9.5 years; disease duration 3.9 ± 4.9 years) were enrolled. Women presented significantly higher TC, LDL and HDL than men. In the whole sample, any association between lipid profile measures and FAB score was found. Among women, a positive association between hypertriglyceridemia and FAB score under cutoff was found (OR 3.4; 95%CI 1.29-9.03; p value 0.013). A statistically significant negative correlation was found between the FAB score and triglyceride serum levels (r = - 0.226; p value 0.005). Differently, among men, a statistically significant negative association between hypercholesterolemia and FAB score under cutoff (OR 0.4; 95%CI 0.17-0.84; p value 0.018) and between high LDL levels and FAB score under cutoff (OR 0.4; 95%CI 0.18-0.90; p value 0.027) were found. Our data suggest a sex-specific different role of lipids in executive functioning.Entities:
Keywords: Cholesterol; Executive functions; Parkinson’s disease; Triglycerides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35024950 PMCID: PMC8930892 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-022-02460-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) ISSN: 0300-9564 Impact factor: 3.850
General characteristics of the sample
| Total (n.348) | Women (n.148) | Man (n.200) | OR | 95%CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yrs | 66.5 ± 9.5 | 66.7 ± 9.2 | 66.5 ± 9.7 | 0.99 | 0.97–1.02 | 0.824 |
| Education, yrs | 8.5 ± 4.8 | 7.8 ± 4.8 | 9.0 ± 4.8 | 1.05 | 1.00–1.10 | 0.027 |
| Age at PD onset, yrs | 62.6 ± 10.5 | 61.9 ± 10.4 | 63.1 ± 10.6 | 1.01 | 0.99–1.03 | 0.317 |
| Disease duration, yrs | 3.9 ± 4.9 | 4.8 ± 5.0 | 3.4 ± 4.7 | 0.94 | 0.89–0.98 | 0.011 |
| UPDRS-ME score | 27.1 ± 12.9 | 28.2 ± 12.6 | 26.2 ± 13.2 | 0.98 | 0.97–1.00 | 0.159 |
| LED mg/die | 333.4 ± 347.2 | 350.1 ± 360.0 | 321.2 ± 337.9 | 0.99 | 0.99–1.00 | 0.443 |
| MMSE score | 27.0 ± 2.1 | 26.8 ± 2.4 | 27.3 ± 1.9 | 1.10 | 0.99–1.22 | 0.059 |
| FAB score | 14.1 ± 2.8 | 13.8 ± 3.1 | 14.3 ± 2.6 | 1.07 | 0.99–1.15 | 0.076 |
| TG mg/dl | 113.7 ± 61.6 | 109.6 ± 56.7 | 116.8 ± 65.0 | 1.00 | 0.99–1.00 | 0.278 |
| TC mg/dl | 188.2 ± 41.6 | 202.9 ± 43.2 | 177.3 ± 36.9 | 0.98 | 0.97–0.98 | < 0.001 |
| HDL mg/dl | 50.6 ± 15.1 | 56.8 ± 15.3 | 45.9 ± 13.2 | 0.94 | 0.92–0.95 | < 0.001 |
| LDL mg/dl | 115.6 ± 35.4 | 124.4 ± 38.9 | 109.0 ± 31.2 | 0.98 | 0.98–0.99 | < 0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number and percentage
OR odd ratio; CI confidence interval; yrs years; PD Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS-ME Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-Motor Examination; LED levodopa equivalent dosage; MMSE mini mental state examination; FAB frontal assessment battery; TG triglycerides; TC total cholesterol; HDL high density lipoproteins; LDL low density lipoproteins
Serum lipid fractions and FAB: univariate and multivariate analysis
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis** | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAB ≥ 13.5 | FAB < 13.5 | OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | |||
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 38 (15.8) | 21 (19.4) | 1.3 | 0.71–2.31 | 0.407 | 1.1 | 0.58–2.20 | 0.700 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 93 (38.7) | 39 (36.1) | 0.9 | 0.55–1.43 | 0.639 | 0.8 | 0.48–1.46 | 0.550 |
| High LDL | 83 (34.6) | 34 (31.5) | 0.9 | 0.53–1.41 | 0.571 | 0.9 | 0.52–1.57 | 0.734 |
| Low HDL | 87 (36.2) | 40 (37.0) | 1.0 | 0.64–1.65 | 0.888 | 0.9 | 0.56–1.58 | 0.819 |
Data are expressed as number and percentage
Bold values indicate statistically significance
LDL low-density lipoproteins, HDL high-density lipoproteins, FAB frontal assessment battery, OR odd ratio, CI confidence interval
*Adjusted for age, sex, education, disease duration, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-Motor Examination; **adjusted for age, education, disease duration, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-Motor Examination
Fig. 1Negative correlation between Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score and Triglycerides (TG) serum levels in the woman group (r = − 0.226; p value 0.005)