| Literature DB >> 32430016 |
Xiaoxue Fu1, Yu Wang2, Xiaofeng He3, Hongyu Li1, Hong Liu4, Xiangyang Zhang5,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Numerous studies have reported that lipid metabolic abnormalities may play an important role in the development of Parkinson's disease (PD), with mixed results. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the relationship between serum cholesterol or triglyceride and the PD risk and to further determine the role of dyslipidemia in potential predictive value.Entities:
Keywords: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Meta-analysis; Parkinson’s disease; Systematic review; Total cholesterol; Triglyceride
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32430016 PMCID: PMC7236933 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01284-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Flow diagram of study selection for the meta-analysis
Characteristics of case-control studies
| Author, Year | PD/control | Country | Mean PD duration | Mean H&Y scale | Assessment of PD | Assessment of status of S-C and S-TG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Becker 2008 [ | 3637/3637 | UK | NA | NA | UKPD criteria/H&Y stage/UPDRS | Medical & Laboratories records |
| Du 2012 [ | 40/29 | USA | 4.2 | 1.5 | UPDRS | Laboratories records |
| Guo 2015 [ | 555/555 | China | 3.8 | 2.5 | UKPD criteria/H&Y stage/UPDRS | Laboratories records |
| Huang 2007 [ | 124/110 | USA | 4.2 | NA | UPDRS | Medical & Laboratories records |
| Ikeda 2011 [ | 119/120 | Japan | 6.9 | 3.2 | UKPD criteria | Laboratories records |
| Kim 2017 [ | 104/52 | Korea | 3.7 | 2.5 | H&Y stage/UPDRS | Laboratories records |
| Kirbas 2014 [ | 42/40 | Turkey | NA | NA | PDBBC/H&Y stage | Laboratories records |
| Miyake 2010 [ | 249/368 | Japan | NA | NA | UKPD criteria | Using diet history questionnaire (DHQ) |
| Savica 2012 [ | 196/196 | USA | NA | NA | H&Y stage/UPDRS | Laboratories records |
| Scigliano 2006 [ | 178/533 | Italy | 1.3 | ≈2 | UKPD criteria/H&Y stage/UPDRS | Laboratories records |
| Vikdahl 2015 [ | 84/336 | Sweden | NA | NA | UKPD criteria | Laboratories records |
| Wei 2013 [ | 110/130 | China | NA | 2.2 | Met the Calne’s criteria of clinically definitive PD | Laboratories records |
| Zhang 2017 [ | 91/70 | USA | NA | NA | MMSE | Laboratories records |
Abbreviations: UKPD United Kingdom PD Society Brain Bank, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, H&Y Hoehn and Yahr scale, UPDRS Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, PDBBC Parkinson’s Disease Brain Bank Criteria, NA not available
Characteristics of cohort studies
| Author, Year | Country | Size of cohort (M/F) | PD cases (M/F) | Age at baseline (Y) | Study period (starting-ending year) | Assessment of PD | Assessment of status of S-C and S-TG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon 2010 [ | USA | 171,879 (50,833/121046) | 530 (NA) | 30–75 | 22.9 (1976–2000) | Parkinsonian signs | Self reported |
| Huang 2008 [ | USA | 3223 (3223/0) | 41 (41/0) | 71–79 | 3 (1991–1993) | Medical records & neurologic examination | Laboratories records |
| Benn 2017 [ | Danish | 111,194 (49,884/61310) | 460 (NA) | 46–66 | 39 (1976–2014) | Medical records | Laboratories records |
| Saaksjarvi 2015 [ | Finland | 6641 (3102/3539) | 89 (49/40) | 30–79 | 30 (1978–2007) | Datebase | Laboratories records |
| de Lau 2006 [ | Netherlands | 6465 (2654/3811) | 87 (46/41) | ≥55 | 9.4 (1990–2004) | Parkinsonian signs & neurologic examination | Laboratories records |
| Hu 2008 [ | Finland | 50,926 (24,773/26153) | 625 (321/304) | 25–64 | 18.1 (1972–1997) | Medical records & neurologic examination | Laboratories records |
| Grandnetti 1994 [ | USA | 8006 (8006/0) | 58 (NA) | 71–93 | 26 (1965–1991) | Medical records | Laboratories records |
| Fang 2019 [ | Sweden | 610,141 (313,044/297097) | 3769 (NA) | 15–77 | 26 (1985–2011) | Medical records | Laboratories records |
Abbreviations: M males, F females, NA not available, Y years
Fig. 2Forest plots for pooled standard weighted mean difference (a) or odds ratios (b) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of studies assessing the association between S-TC levels and risk of Parkinson’s disease. Forest plots pooled standard weighted mean difference (c) or odds ratios (d) for meta-analysis after excluding the study by Ikeda et al. [20] or Hu et al. [33]
Fig. 3Forest plots for pooled standard weighted mean difference (a) or odds ratios (b) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of studies assessing the association between S-TG levels and risk of Parkinson’s disease. Forest plots pooled standard weighted mean difference (c) for meta-analysis after excluding the study by Ikeda et al. [20]
Summary of Comparative Outcomes for serum lipid Levels
| Data type | Item | No. of studies | PD/Control | Main effect | Heterogeneity | Publication bias | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hedges g(95%CI) | z score | Q statistic | df | p value | I2 statistic | Egger intercept | p value | |||||
| Continuous | TC | 8 | 724/889 | -0.29 (−0.46, −0.13) | 3.48 | 0.0005 | 16.51 | 7 | 0.02 | 58% | −1.9330 | 0.483 |
| adjustion | 7 | 605/769 | −0.21 (− 0.33, − 0.10) | 3.69 | 0.0002 | 9.23 | 6 | 0.16 | 35% | – | – | |
| TG | 6 | 542/865 | −0.19 (− 0.31, − 0.08) | 3.37 | 0.0008 | 9.68 | 5 | 0.08 | 48% | 2.8479 | 0.472 | |
| adjustion | 5 | 423/745 | −0.26 (−0.39, − 0.13) | 4.06 | <0.0001 | 4.13 | 4 | 0.38 | 3% | – | – | |
| LDL | 6 | 536/501 | −0.31 (−0.49,-0.14) | 3.48 | 0.0005 | 9.57 | 5 | 0.09 | 48% | −0.9563 | 0.974 | |
| adjustion | 5 | 417/381 | −0.26 (− 0.43, − 0.07) | 2.74 | 0.006 | 6.59 | 4 | 0.16 | 39% | – | – | |
| HDL | 5 | 496/472 | 0.08 (−0.04, 0.21) | 1.28 | 0.20 | 1.94 | 4 | 0.75 | 0% | 0.4329 | 0.851 | |
| Dichotomous | TC | 12 | – | 0.91 (0.79, 1.04) | 1.42 | 0.16 | 40.72 | 11 | <0.0001 | 73% | −0.3306 | 0.965 |
| adjustion | 11 | – | 0.86 (0.77, 0.97) | 2.55 | 0.01 | 24.09 | 10 | 0.007 | 58% | – | – | |
| TG | 4 | – | 0.67 (0.60,0.75) | 6.82 | <0.00001 | 3.58 | 3 | 0.31 | 16% | −1.3695 | 0.107 | |
| LDL | 4 | – | 0.76 (0.59,0.97) | 2.23 | 0.03 | 16.89 | 3 | 0.0007 | 82% | −2.3686 | 0.205 | |
Abbreviations: TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, LDL low density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL high density lipoprotein cholesterol, C cholesterol, S serum
Fig. 4Sensitivity analyses for pooled standard weighted mean difference and odds ratios of studies assessing the association between S-TC levels and risk of Parkinson’s disease using a leave-one-out strategy