| Literature DB >> 35023369 |
Xuan Thi Dang1,2, Thanh Xuan Nguyen3,4,5, Huong Thi Thu Nguyen3,4, Hung Tran Ha1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of venom-induced consumption coagulopathy has been reported in individuals with viper snakebites. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a rapid technique that could be advantageous in assessing and monitoring coagulation disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Thromboelastometry; Vietnam; coagulopathy; rotational thromboelastometry; snakebite; viper
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35023369 PMCID: PMC8785307 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211067321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
General characteristics of study participants.
| Characteristics | N = 41 (%) |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Female | 16 (39) |
| Male | 25 (61) |
| Place of snake bite | |
| Home | 5 (12.2) |
| Garden | 8 (19.5) |
| Mountain | 26 (63.4) |
| Other | 2 (4.9) |
| Duration of hospitalization (days) | |
| 1–5 | 24 (58.5) |
| 6–10 | 15 (36.6) |
| >10 | 2 (4.9) |
| Snake type | |
| | 22 (53.7) |
| | 7 (17.1) |
| | 1 (2.4) |
| | 1 (2.4) |
| Undefined | 10 (24.4) |
| Death | 0 (0.0) |
| Standard coagulation of patients | |
| Platelet decreased | 14 (34.1) |
| PT % decreased | 16 (39.0) |
| aPTT prolonged | 7 (17.1) |
| INR increased | 29 (70.7) |
| Bleeding events | |
| Bleeding at snake bite place | 15 (36.6) |
| Skin hemorrhage | 26 (63.4) |
| Gastrointestinal hemorrhage | 3 (7.3) |
| Muscle bleed | 29 (70.7) |
| Gums bleeding | 2 (4.9) |
Mean (SD) | |
| Time delay to hospital admission (hours) | 21.32 (18.85) |
| Age (years) | 41.3 (14.7) |
| PT on admission | 70.4 (32.8) |
| aPTT on admission | 41.2 (29.8) |
| Fibrinogen levels on admission | 1.6 (1.2) |
| Platelet count on admission | 164.0 (108.3) |
| CT INTEM on admission | 589.2 (1108.6) |
| CT FIBTEM on admission | 1270.8 (2004.6) |
| CT EXTEM on admission | 496.6 (1138.0) |
| CFT INTEM on admission | 335.9 (518.5) |
| CFT FIBTEM on admission | 634.7 (232.3) |
| CFT EXTEM on admission | 289.6 (355.6) |
| MCF INTEM on admission | 43.8 (16.0) |
| MCF FIBTEM on admission | 11.2 (6.9) |
| MCF EXTEM on admission | 42.3 (17.9) |
| DIC score | 3.4 (2.7) |
Range | |
| Delay in presentation to hospital (hours) | 2–81 |
PT, prothrombin time; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; INR, international normalized ratio; SD, standard deviation; CT, clotting time; INTEM, intrinsic rotational thromboelastometry; EXTEM, extrinsic rotational thromboelastometry; FIBTEM, fibrin-based rotational thromboelastometry; CFT, clot information time; MCF, maximum clot firmness; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Characteristics of EXTEM and FIBTEM maximum lysis.
| ML (%) | EXTEM, N (%) |
|---|---|
| <5 | 4 (10.8) |
| 5 ≤ ML ≤15 | 14 (37.8) |
| >15 | 19 (51.4) |
FIBTEM, N (%) | |
| <10 | 18 (58.0) |
| ≥10 | 13 (42.0) |
Note: data for ML by EXTEM were missing for four patients, while data for ML by FIBTEM were missing for 10 patients.
EXTEM, extrinsic rotational thromboelastometry; FIBTEM, fibrin-based rotational thromboelastometry; ML, maximum lysis.
ROTEM parameters measured in this study.
| A5 | A10 | MCF | CT (s) | CFT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | Median (IQR) | N (%) | Median (IQR) | N (%) | Median (IQR) | N (%) | Median (IQR) | N (%) | Median (IQR) | |
| INTEM | ||||||||||
| Decreased | 32 (86.5) | 28 (17.5, 39.5) | 25 (67.5) | 38 (26.5, 49.5) | 23 (62.2) | 48 (36.5, 56) | 0 (0) | 213 (177.5, 358) | 8 (19.5) | 165 (92, 276.5) |
| Normal | 5 (13.5) | 12 (32.4) | 14 (37.8) | 27 (65.9) | 0 (0) | |||||
| Increased | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 14 (34.1) | 33 (80.5) | |||||
| Total | 37 (100) (missing: 4) | 37 (100) (missing: 4) | 37 (100) (missing: 4) | 41 (100) | 41 (100) | |||||
| EXTEM | ||||||||||
| Decreased | 24 (64.9) | 28 (16.5, 38.5) | 24 (64.9) | 38 (26, 48.5) | 23 (62.2) | 48 (29.5, 57.5) | 0 (0) | 91 (62, 267.5) | 9 (22) | 165.5 (99, 341.8) |
| Normal | 13 (35.1) | 13 (35.1) | 14 (37.8) | 15 (36.6) | 0 (0) | |||||
| Increased | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 26 (63.4) | 32 (78) | |||||
| Total | 37 (100) (missing: 4) | 37 (100) (missing: 4) | 37 (100) (missing: 4) | 41 (100) | 41 (100) | |||||
| FIBTEM | ||||||||||
| Decreased | 13 (41.9) | 9 (4, 12) | 9 (29) | 10 (4, 13) | 11 (35.5) | 12 (4, 14) | 0 (0) | 87 (57.5, 2407) | 38 (92.7) | 680 (383, –) |
| Normal | 18 (57.1) | 21 (67.7) | 19 (61.3) | 16 (39) | 0 (0) | |||||
| Increased | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.2) | 1 (3.2) | 25 (61) | 3 (7.3) | |||||
| Total | 31 (100) (missing: 10) | 31 (100) (missing: 10) | 31 (100) (missing: 10) | 41 (100) | 41 (100) | |||||
ROTEM, rotational thromboelastometry; A5, clot firmness (in mm) after 5 minutes; A10, clot firmness (in mm) after 10 minutes; MCF, maximum clot firmness; CT, clotting time; CFT, clot information time; IQR, interquartile range; INTEM, intrinsic rotational thromboelastometry; EXTEM, extrinsic rotational thromboelastometry; FIBTEM, fibrin-based rotational thromboelastometry.
Figure 1.Correlations between ROTEM parameters and standard coagulation tests (PT %, aPTT %, fibrinogen, and platelet counts). Correlations between (a) EXTEM CT and PT % on admission, (b) INTEM CT and aPTT on admission, (c) FIBTEM MCF and fibrinogen level on admission, and (d) EXTEM MCF and platelet count on admission.
PT, prothrombin time; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CT, clotting time; EXTEM, extrinsic rotational thromboelastometry; INTEM, intrinsic rotational thromboelastometry; FIBTEM, fibrin-based rotational thromboelastometry; MCF, maximum clot firmness; ROTEM, rotational thromboelastometry.