| Literature DB >> 35015745 |
Stefano Rinaldi1, Suresh Pallikkuth1,2, Lesley De Armas1, Brian Richardson3, Li Pan1, Rajendra Pahwa1, Sion Williams1,2, Mark Cameron2,3, Savita Pahwa1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Virally suppressed chronic HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy experience similar immune impairments as HIV-uninfected elderly. However, they manifest symptoms of premature immune aging such as suboptimal responses to vaccination at a younger age. Mechanisms underlying premature immune aging are unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35015745 PMCID: PMC8751284 DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ISSN: 1525-4135 Impact factor: 3.771
Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants
| HIV Negative (HC) | HIV Positive | |||
| Young | Old | Young | Old | |
| No. of individuals | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
| Age, yr | ||||
| Median | 33.5 | 64 | 31 | 61 |
| Range | 23–39 | 61–71 | 19–39 | 60–71 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male/female |
|
|
|
|
| Race, n | ||||
| White/Black/Asian | 4/6/2 | 4/6/2 | 3/9/0 | 3/9/0 |
| Ethnicity, n | ||||
| Hispanic/non-Hispanic | 3/8 | 4/8 | 5/7 | 3/8 |
| HIV | ||||
| HIV viral load (copies/mL) | <50 | <50 | ||
| Absolute cell counts (cells/mm3) | ||||
| Lymphocytes, mean± SD | 1846.6 ± 562.3 | 1749.3 ± 483.1 | 1804.5 ± 379.5 | 1425.6 ± 373.7 |
| | 1189.7 ± 369.1 | 1080.94 ± 362.9 | 1254.9 ± 338.1 | 939.9 ± 319.3 |
| | 836.7 ± 424.4 | 742.56 ± 181.6 | 895.6 ± 335.9 | 564.3 ± 303.8 |
| | 510.5 ± 316.9 | 503.46 ± 304.05 | 381.6 ± 279.6 | 349.6 ± 323.0 |
| B cell (% of lymphocytes), mean± SD | 9.7 ± 5.6 | 10.5 ± 7.2 | 8.6 ± 4.4 | 10.7 ± 6.0 |
FIGURE 1.Aging effect on the PBMC transcriptional signature is different in HC and HIV. A, Pathway analysis in HC and HIV. B, Differences in pathways analysis between HC and HIV. Pathways in A were filtered based on P value <0.05 and activated Z score (>2 or <−2). Pathways with a positive activated Z score are reported in orange, whereas pathways with a negative activated Z score are reported in blue. Darker the colors, greater is the activated Z score.
FIGURE 2.Aging effect on the PBMC transcriptional signature is different in HC and HIV. A, Differences in pathways analysis between HC and HIV. Pathways in A were filtered based on P value <0.05 and activated Z score (>2 or <−2). Pathways with a positive activated Z score are reported in orange, whereas pathways with a negative activated Z score are reported in blue. Darker the colors, greater is the activated Z score. B, Analysis of upstream regulators in HC and HIV. Arrow indicates direct interactions. Dotted arrow indicates indirect interactions. C, Upstream regulator comparison between HC and HIV. Upstream regulators were considered significant with a P value ≤0.05. Upstream regulators are predicted to be activated (in orange) or inhibited (in blue) based on activation Z score. Z scores greater than 2 or less than −2 were considered to be significantly activated or inhibited, respectively.
FIGURE 3.Effect of aging on the PBMC transcriptional signature is different in HC and HIV. Venn diagram of the DEG in the comparison young versus old in HC (blue) and HIV (red). The number of DEG is reported inside the circle.
FIGURE 4.Transcriptional signatures predictive of age are different for HC (A) and HIV (B). Old individuals are reported in blue in the PLSDA plot, whereas young are reported in orange. Ellipse showed the 95% confidence interval. The PLSDA variable plot (right) illustrates the correlations of the variables with the first 2 components. Heatmap shows the expression high (red) or low (green) for the genes selected by the predictive model in old (red) and young (green). PLSDA, partial least squares discriminant analysis.