| Literature DB >> 31316102 |
Silvia Ravera1,2, Marina Podestà3, Federica Sabatini3, Monica Dagnino3, Daniela Cilloni4, Samuele Fiorini5, Annalisa Barla5, Francesco Frassoni3,6.
Abstract
Aging is a physiological process in which multifactorial processes determine a progressive decline. Several alterations contribute to the aging process, including telomere shortening, oxidative stress, deregulated autophagy and epigenetic modifications. In some cases, these alterations are so linked with the aging process that it is possible predict the age of a person on the basis of the modification of one specific pathway, as proposed by Horwath and his aging clock based on DNA methylation. Because the energy metabolism changes are involved in the aging process, in this work, we propose a new aging clock based on the modifications of glucose catabolism. The biochemical analyses were performed on mononuclear cells isolated from peripheral blood, obtained from a healthy population with an age between 5 and 106 years. In particular, we have evaluated the oxidative phosphorylation function and efficiency, the ATP/AMP ratio, the lactate dehydrogenase activity and the malondialdehyde content. Further, based on these biochemical markers, we developed a machine learning-based mathematical model able to predict the age of an individual with a mean absolute error of approximately 9.7 years. This mathematical model represents a new non-invasive tool to evaluate and define the age of individuals and could be used to evaluate the effects of drugs or other treatments on the early aging or the rejuvenation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31316102 PMCID: PMC6637183 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46749-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Changes of MNC energy status during aging. Graph shows the ATP/AMP ratio, as a marker of the energy status of MNC isolated from peripheral blood (PB), obtained from healthy population with an age between 5 and 106 years. The population is divided by decades. The values decrease progressively with aging. * or ** indicate, respectively, a significant difference for p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 between the marked decade and the previous decade.
Figure 2Changes of MNC glucose metabolism during aging. All data are obtained using MNC isolated from peripheral blood (PB) of healthy subjects with an age between 5 and 106 years. (A,B) Show the efficiency of the oxidative phosphorylation, expressed as P/O ratio, in the presence of pyruvate + malate or succinate, respectively. In both cases, the values decrease during aging, suggesting an uncoupling between oxygen consumption and ATP synthesis, which determines a low efficiency in energy production. (C) Reports the lactate dehydrogenase activity, as a marker of anaerobic glucose metabolism. The values increase in the elderly subjects, indicating that the lactate fermentation enhances parallel to the aging. (D) Shows the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), as a marker of oxidative stress, which increases with aging, probably due to the minor OXPHOS efficiency. In each panel, the population is divided by decades. * or ** indicate, respectively, a significant difference for p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 between the marked decades and the previous decade.
Figure 3Changes of correlation among the biochemical markers during aging. Heatmaps reported in this figure show the correlations among the biochemical markers reported in Figs 1 and 2. Population is divided into 5 groups, one for each two decades (0–20, 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, >81). Dark red entries indicate a strong positive correlation, white entries represent no correlation and dark blue entries correspond to strong negative correlation. Each age group is characterized by a specific pattern of correlations.
Example of Eq. 2 application to predict age on the basis of glucose metabolism markers.
| Sample ID | Biochemical markers | predicted age (years) | real age (years) | abs (error) (years) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 12.24 | 2.69 | 1.38 | 29.93 | 0.57 | 3.73 | 205.98 | 2.49 | 34 | 30 | +4 |
|
| 11.35 | 2.36 | 1.34 | 31.26 | 0.66 | 4.21 | 241.56 | 2.19 | 40 | 35 | +5 |
|
| 12.63 | 0.96 | 1.19 | 15.67 | 0.56 | 6.95 | 326.47 | 1.87 | 57 | 54 | +3 |
|
| 12.74 | 0.86 | 0.62 | 11.75 | 0.56 | 5.46 | 265.11 | 1.11 | 58 | 56 | +2 |
|
| 10.45 | 1.28 | 0.88 | 14.4 | 0.65 | 6.53 | 301.27 | 0.79 | 59 | 55 | +4 |
|
| 19.31 | 1.03 | 0.87 | 23.65 | 0.53 | 8.29 | 345.19 | 1.5 | 61 | 66 | +5 |
|
| 16.21 | 0.86 | 0.98 | 11.02 | 0.72 | 5.99 | 265.78 | 0.61 | 62 | 57 | +5 |
|
| 23.28 | 1.36 | 0.48 | 16.69 | 0.79 | 9.41 | 251.36 | 0.68 | 66 | 65 | +1 |
|
| 43.64 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 5.55 | 0.53 | 9.63 | 285.41 | 1.49 | 70 | 64 | +6 |
|
| 17.12 | 1.06 | 1.07 | 14.22 | 0.82 | 9.2 | 302.75 | 0.44 | 70 | 69 | +1 |
|
| 39.16 | 0.48 | 0.2 | 7.17 | 0.49 | 12.75 | 256.78 | 1.85 | 72 | 72 | 0 |
|
| 50.6 | 0.29 | 0.4 | 5.25 | 0.66 | 9.18 | 298.75 | 0.88 | 72 | 71 | +1 |
|
| 9.87 | 0.73 | 0.21 | 11.43 | 0.8 | 10.99 | 382.89 | 0.39 | 77 | 83 | −6 |
|
| 13.64 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 7.24 | 0.8 | 13.93 | 385.14 | 0.38 | 85 | 82 | +3 |
The table represents an example of Eq. 2 application on 14 subjects randomly extracted from the test set. For each subject, the biochemical markers of glucose metabolism, the real and predicted ages and their difference are reported.