Literature DB >> 35015180

Mammographic Density Assessment by Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Comparison with Automated Volumetric Assessment.

Si Eun Lee1, Nak-Hoon Son2, Myung Hyun Kim1, Eun-Kyung Kim3.   

Abstract

We evaluated and compared the mammographic density assessment of an artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) program using inter-rater agreements between radiologists and an automated density assessment program. Between March and May 2020, 488 consecutive mammograms of 488 patients (56.2 ± 10.9 years) were collected from a single institution. We assigned four classes of mammographic density based on BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) using commercial AI-CAD (Lunit INSIGHT MMG), and compared inter-rater agreements between radiologists, AI-CAD, and another commercial automated density assessment program (Volpara®). The inter-rater agreement between AI-CAD and the reader consensus was 0.52 with a matched rate of 68.2% (333/488). The inter-rater agreement between Volpara® and the reader consensus was similar to AI-CAD at 0.50 with a matched rate of 62.7% (306/488). The inter-rater agreement between AI-CAD and Volpara® was 0.54 with a matched rate of 61.5% (300/488). In conclusion, density assessments by AI-CAD showed fair agreement with those of radiologists, similar to the agreement between the commercial automated density assessment program and radiologists.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Breast density; Diagnosis, Computer-assisted; Digital mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35015180      PMCID: PMC8921363          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00555-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  21 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Adam Yala; Tal Schuster; Brian Dontchos; Manisha Bahl; Kyle Swanson; Regina Barzilay
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son; Jeong-Ah Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density Distribution.

Authors:  Abid Irshad; Rebecca Leddy; Susan Ackerman; Abbie Cluver; Dag Pavic; Ahad Abid; Madelene C Lewis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mary C Spayne; Charlotte C Gard; Joan Skelly; Diana L Miglioretti; Pamela M Vacek; Berta M Geller
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Kathleen R Brandt; Christopher G Scott; Lin Ma; Amir P Mahmoudzadeh; Matthew R Jensen; Dana H Whaley; Fang Fang Wu; Serghei Malkov; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron D Norman; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A deep learning method for classifying mammographic breast density categories.

Authors:  Aly A Mohamed; Wendie A Berg; Hong Peng; Yahong Luo; Rachel C Jankowitz; Shandong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  A Multisite Study of a Breast Density Deep Learning Model for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Synthetic Mammography.

Authors:  Thomas P Matthews; Sadanand Singh; Brent Mombourquette; Jason Su; Meet P Shah; Stefano Pedemonte; Aaron Long; David Maffit; Jenny Gurney; Rodrigo Morales Hoil; Nikita Ghare; Douglas Smith; Stephen M Moore; Susan C Marks; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-11-04

10.  Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Yiqiu Shen; Zhe Huang; Masha Zorin; Stanislaw Jastrzebski; Thibault Fevry; Joe Katsnelson; Eric Kim; Stacey Wolfson; Ujas Parikh; Sushma Gaddam; Leng Leng Young Lin; Kara Ho; Joshua D Weinstein; Beatriu Reig; Yiming Gao; Hildegard Toth; Kristine Pysarenko; Alana Lewin; Jiyon Lee; Krystal Airola; Eralda Mema; Stephanie Chung; Esther Hwang; Naziya Samreen; S Gene Kim; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of Computer 3D Modeling Technology in Graphic Image Design.

Authors:  Jin Liu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.