Literature DB >> 35013991

Implicit learning of a response-contingent task.

Injae Hong1, Su Keun Jeong2,3, Min-Shik Kim4.   

Abstract

In previous research, relative response speed was revealed to have been used as a predictive cue to guide attention to a target location, in a phenomenon known as "cueing by response." In this study, we explored whether responses can implicitly induce the use of cognitive control, especially in selecting and implementing task-sets. Participants were trained to perform tasks corresponding to different task cues during the training phase. Unbeknownst to participants, the response-contingent group's response to the previous trial determined task type in the subsequent trial, while that of the random group was randomly determined. When the task cue was removed in the testing phase, the percentage of correctly selected response-contingent tasks of the response-contingent group was at a greater level than the chance and the random group, implying that cueing by response can activate appropriate task-sets. The perceptual stimuli did not modulate the task cueing by response, and the response was directly associated with the task. Thus, the results show that top-down control can be carried out even without conscious awareness, using response as a novel type of cue.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consciousness and unconsciousness; Cueing by response; Implicit learning; Task-set

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35013991     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02401-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  22 in total

1.  Implicit learning of sequences of tasks.

Authors:  H Heuer; V Schmidtke; T Kleinsorge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: an fMRI study.

Authors:  D Y Kimberg; G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

3.  Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning.

Authors:  Birgit Elsner; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-18

4.  Serial pattern learning by event observation.

Authors:  J H Howard; S A Mutter; D V Howard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Unconscious biases in task choices depend on conscious expectations.

Authors:  Carlos González-García; Pío Tudela; María Ruz
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2015-08-13

6.  Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Effect anticipation and action control.

Authors:  B Elsner; B Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Context-specific attentional sampling: Intentional control as a pre-requisite for contextual control.

Authors:  Nicholaus P Brosowsky; Matthew J C Crump
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2016-08-05

10.  Anticipatory control through associative learning of subliminal relations: invisible may be better than visible.

Authors:  Ausaf A Farooqui; Tom Manly
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.