Literature DB >> 35013911

Opinions and experiences of recontacting patients: a survey of Australasian genetic health professionals.

Bhavya Bhupen Vora1, Helen Mountain2,3, Cassandra Nichols2, Lyn Schofield2.   

Abstract

The issue of recontacting past genetics patients is increasingly relevant, particularly with the introduction of next-generation sequencing. Improved testing can provide additional information on the pathogenicity and prevalence of genetic variants, often leading to a need to recontact patients. Some international genetics societies have position statements and recommendations to guide genetic health professionals (GHPs) navigating the legal, ethical and practical issues of recontacting. In the absence of a standardised Australasian protocol, we explored the experiences and opinions of Australasian GHPs regarding patient follow-up and recontacting practices. Forty-five respondents completed an online survey. Most respondents indicated that recontacting occurred on an ad hoc basis, but most genetic services relied on patients (or family) initiating recontact. Implementation of a routine recontacting system was widely dismissed by 73% of respondents, citing lack of resources, limited information on legal responsibility and setting unrealistic expectations as common barriers. If recontact was contemplated, e-communication was an acceptable first step. This study identified the need for integrated familial cancer registries to assist under-resourced genetic services to maintain up-to-date patient records. Developing a standard recontacting protocol with flexibility to account for patient individuality and circumstances might enable provision of equitable service within Australasia.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Clinical genetics; Genetic counselling; Genetic counselling policy; Recontact

Year:  2022        PMID: 35013911      PMCID: PMC8941026          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-021-00570-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  22 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic information in families--a review of guidelines and position papers.

Authors:  Laura E Forrest; Martin B Delatycki; Loane Skene; MaryAnne Aitken
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A 'joint venture' model of recontacting in clinical genomics: challenges for responsible implementation.

Authors:  Sandi Dheensa; Daniele Carrieri; Susan Kelly; Angus Clarke; Shane Doheny; Peter Turnpenny; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Enhancing family communication about genetics: ethical and professional dilemmas.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Clara Gaff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic Counseling in the Era of Genomics: What's all the Fuss about?

Authors:  Gemma R Brett; Ella J Wilkins; Emma T Creed; Kirsty West; Anna Jarmolowicz; Giulia M Valente; Yael Prawer; Elly Lynch; Ivan Macciocca
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Hereditary breast cancer; Genetic penetrance and current status with BRCA.

Authors:  Morteza Mahdavi; Mohammadreza Nassiri; Mohammad Mahdi Kooshyar; Masoume Vakili-Azghandi; Amir Avan; Ryan Sandry; Suja Pillai; Alfred King-Yin Lam; Vinod Gopalan
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 6.  Sociodemographic, psychosocial and clinical factors associated with uptake of genetic counselling for hereditary cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A M Willis; S K Smith; B Meiser; M L Ballinger; D M Thomas; M-A Young
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Recontact practices of cancer genetic counselors and an exploration of professional, legal, and ethical duty.

Authors:  Amy Mueller; Emily Dalton; Danielle Enserro; Catharine Wang; Maureen Flynn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Karen L David; Robert G Best; Leslie Manace Brenman; Lynn Bush; Joshua L Deignan; David Flannery; Jodi D Hoffman; Ingrid Holm; David T Miller; James O'Leary; Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Mirjam Plantinga; Erwin Birnie; Marian A Verkerk; Anneke M Lucassen; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M Van Langen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Family Studies for Classification of Variants of Uncertain Classification: Current Laboratory Clinical Practice and a New Web-Based Educational Tool.

Authors:  Lauren T Garrett; Nathan Hickman; Angela Jacobson; Robin L Bennett; Laura M Amendola; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; Brian H Shirts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.