| Literature DB >> 35013511 |
Markus Dengg1, Claudine H Stirling2, Malcolm R Reid2, Piet Verburg3, Evelyn Armstrong4, Laura T Kelly5, Susanna A Wood5.
Abstract
Freshwater phytoplankton blooms are increasing in prevalence and there are conflicting views on whether trace metals limit growth of key species and thus bloom formation. The Taupō Volcanic Zone (TVZ), New Zealand, was formed by multiple eruptions of a super-volcano which emitted rhyolitic tephra leaving lakes depleted in trace metals. This provides an opportunity to test the potential of trace metal limitation on freshwater phytoplankton growth under nanomolar concentrations. Growth responses of two algal species isolated from Lake Taupō, Dolichospermum lemmermannii (cyanobacteria) and Fragilaria crotonensis (diatom), to six biologically important trace metals (manganese, iron, zinc, cobalt, copper and molybdenum) were examined in culture experiments. These were conducted at three trace metal concentrations: (1) ambient, (2) two-times ambient, and (3) ten-times ambient concentrations in Lake Taupō. Elevated concentrations of iron significantly increased growth rates and maximum cell densities in D. lemmermannii, whereas no significant concentration dependence was observed for other trace metals. Fragilaria crotonensis showed no significant growth response to elevated concentrations of trace metals. These results highlight the importance of iron as a growth limiting nutrient for cyanobacteria and indicate that even small (twofold) increases in Fe concentrations could enhance cyanobacteria growth rates in Lake Taupō, potentially causing cyanobacterial blooms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35013511 PMCID: PMC8748459 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04533-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Experimental set up.
| Treatment | Mn | Fe | Co | Cu | Zn | Mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mix 1 × | 2.25 (0.03) | 25.6 (2.7) | 0.085 (0.006) | 1.7 (0.2) | < LOD | 2.6 (0.2) |
| Mix 2 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | 2 × Mix 1 × |
| Mix 10 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | 10 × Mix 1 × |
| Mn 2 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Mn 10 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Fe 2 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Fe 10 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Co 2 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Co 10 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Cu 2 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Cu 10 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Zn 2 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Zn 10 × | 10 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Mo 2 × | 2 × Mix 1 × | |||||
| Mo 10 × | 10 × Mix 1 × |
Trace metal concentrations for manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and molybdenum (Mo) measured (nmol*L−1) of treatment Mix 1 × and expected concentrations for each other treatment tested. Mix 1 × refers to the concentration of the respective trace metal present in the base media. Every treatment was prepared in a base of Mix 1 × media. ± 1SD of measurements are given in brackets.
Targeted and actual trace metal concentrations after culture addition in the Mix 1 × culture media.
| Element | Target concentrations in ‘Mix 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mn | 2.3 (± 0.2) | 3.82 (± 0.06) | 69 | 2.16(± 0.03) | < 5 |
| Fe | 22.1 (± 2.3) | 46.7 (± 2.6) | 111 | 44.9(± 2.5) | 103 |
| Co | 0.072 (± 0.006) | 0.095 (± 0.01) | 36 | 0.07 (± 0.01) | < 5 |
| Cu | 1.4 (± 0.2) | 1.7 (± 0.1) | 26 | 1.8 (± 0.1) | 28 |
| Zn | 0.55 (± 0.1) | 9.7 (± 0.6) | 1663 | 4.6 (± 0.4) | 736 |
| Mo | 2.3 (± 0.2) | 2.7 (± 0.2) | 17 | 3.1 (± 0.2) | 34 |
The corresponding ± 1SD uncertainties are given in brackets.
Figure 1Actual concentrations of trace metals (nmol L−1) after culture addition (circles) to growth media and at the end of the experiments (triangles), compared to target trace metal concentrations (purple stars) for (A) Dolichospermum lemmermannii and (B) Fragilaria crotonensis. No datapoints are shown when application of a blank correction to Zn concentration yielded a negative result.
Figure 2Dolichospermum lemmermannii (A) and Fragilaria crotonensis (B) growth rate per day as determined by cell counts. Significant differences between treatments as determined by TUKEY post-hoc test are indicated by the letters at α = 0.05.
Figure 3Dolichospermum lemmermannii (A) and Fragilaria crotonensis (B) maximum cell density as determined by cell enumeration. Significant differences between treatments as determined by TUKEY post-hoc test are indicated by the letters at α = 0.05. No significant differences were determined for growth rates of Fragilaria crotonensis.