Literature DB >> 26771345

Are harmful algal blooms becoming the greatest inland water quality threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems?

Bryan W Brooks1, James M Lazorchak2, Meredith D A Howard3, Mari-Vaughn V Johnson4, Steve L Morton5, Dawn A K Perkins6, Euan D Reavie7, Geoffrey I Scott8, Stephanie A Smith9, Jeffery A Steevens10.   

Abstract

In this Focus article, the authors ask a seemingly simple question: Are harmful algal blooms (HABs) becoming the greatest inland water quality threat to public health and aquatic ecosystems? When HAB events require restrictions on fisheries, recreation, and drinking water uses of inland water bodies significant economic consequences result. Unfortunately, the magnitude, frequency, and duration of HABs in inland waters are poorly understood across spatiotemporal scales and differentially engaged among states, tribes, and territories. Harmful algal bloom impacts are not as predictable as those from conventional chemical contaminants, for which water quality assessment and management programs were primarily developed, because interactions among multiple natural and anthropogenic factors determine the likelihood and severity to which a HAB will occur in a specific water body. These forcing factors can also affect toxin production. Beyond site-specific water quality degradation caused directly by HABs, the presence of HAB toxins can negatively influence routine surface water quality monitoring, assessment, and management practices. Harmful algal blooms present significant challenges for achieving water quality protection and restoration goals when these toxins confound interpretation of monitoring results and environmental quality standards implementation efforts for other chemicals and stressors. Whether HABs presently represent the greatest threat to inland water quality is debatable, though in inland waters of developed countries they typically cause more severe acute impacts to environmental quality than conventional chemical contamination events. The authors identify several timely research needs. Environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry, and risk-assessment expertise must interface with ecologists, engineers, and public health practitioners to engage the complexities of HAB assessment and management, to address the forcing factors for HAB formation, and to reduce the threats posed to inland surface water quality.
© 2015 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture; Ambient toxicity; Climate change; Essential services of environmental public health; Harmful algae; Lake and reservoir monitoring; Salinization; Toxin; Urbanization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26771345     DOI: 10.1002/etc.3220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  44 in total

1.  Optimization of extraction methods for quantification of microcystin-LR and microcystin-RR in fish, vegetable, and soil matrices using UPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Manjunath Manubolu; Jiyoung Lee; Kenneth M Riedl; Zi Xun Kua; Lindsay P Collart; Stuart A Ludsin
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.273

Review 2.  Detection, Occurrence and Fate of Emerging Contaminants in Agricultural Environments.

Authors:  Daniel D Snow; David A Cassada; Megan L Larsen; Noelle A Mware; Xu Li; Matteo D'Alessio; Yun Zhang; J Brett Sallach
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 1.946

Review 3.  Multiple riparian-stream connections are predicted to change in response to salinization.

Authors:  Sally A Entrekin; Natalie A Clay; Anastasia Mogilevski; Brooke Howard-Parker; Michelle A Evans-White
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  In some places, in some cases, and at some times, harmful algal blooms are the greatest threat to inland water quality.

Authors:  Bryan W Brooks; James M Lazorchak; Meredith D A Howard; Mari-Vaughn V Johnson; Steve L Morton; Dawn A K Perkins; Euan D Reavie; Geoffrey I Scott; Stephanie A Smith; Jeffery A Steevens
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Water quality modeling of a prairie river-lake system.

Authors:  Nasim Hosseini; Eric Akomeah; John-Mark Davis; Helen Baulch; Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Suspect and non-target screening of acutely toxic Prymnesium parvum.

Authors:  Raegyn B Taylor; Bridgett N Hill; Jonathan M Bobbitt; Amanda S Hering; Bryan W Brooks; C Kevin Chambliss
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Eutrophication endpoints for large rivers in Ohio, USA.

Authors:  Robert J Miltner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives for an Ecologically Meaningful Classification Based on Phytoplankton of the Status of Greek Lakes, Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  Maria Moustaka-Gouni; Ulrich Sommer; Athena Economou-Amilli; George B Arhonditsis; Matina Katsiapi; Eva Papastergiadou; Konstantinos A Kormas; Elisabeth Vardaka; Hera Karayanni; Theodoti Papadimitriou
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Biological index based on epiphytic diatom assemblages is more restrictive than the physicochemical index in water assessment on an Amazon floodplain, Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Tereza Morais Pereira Souza Lobo; Paulo Sérgio Scalize; Cleber Nunes Kraus; Weliton José da Silva; Jérémie Garnier; David da Motta Marques; Marie-Paule Bonnet; Ina de Souza Nogueira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  A closed vitrification system enables a murine ovarian follicle bank for high-throughput ovotoxicity screening, which identifies endocrine disrupting activity of microcystins.

Authors:  Yingzheng Wang; Jingshan Xu; Jessica E Stanley; Murong Xu; Bryan W Brooks; Geoffrey I Scott; Saurabh Chatterjee; Qiang Zhang; Mary B Zelinski; Shuo Xiao
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.