Literature DB >> 23885808

Human impact on freshwater ecosystem services: a global perspective.

Walter K Dodds1, Joshuah S Perkin, Joseph E Gerken.   

Abstract

Human environmental change influences freshwaters as well as the regulating, provisioning, and cultural services that ecosystems provide worldwide. Here, we assess the global human impact on the potential value of six freshwater ecosystem services (ES) and estimate the proportion of each used globally (the mean value across all countries is in parentheses): biodiversity (0.37), disturbance regulation (0.24), commodities (0.39), greenhouse gases (0.09), water availability (0.10), and water quality (0.33). We also created a composite index of the impact. Using different valuation schemes, we found that humans have used potential global freshwater ES scaled by a relative value of roughly 4-20%, with a median of 16%. All countries use a considerable amount of the potential ES value, invalidating the idea that wealthier countries have less impact on their ES once they have developed. The data suggest that humans have diminished the potential ES provided by freshwaters across the globe and that factors associated with high population growth rates are related to the overall degradation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23885808     DOI: 10.1021/es4021052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  16 in total

1.  Global impacts of energy demand on the freshwater resources of nations.

Authors:  Robert Alan Holland; Kate A Scott; Martina Flörke; Gareth Brown; Robert M Ewers; Elizabeth Farmer; Valerie Kapos; Ann Muggeridge; Jörn P W Scharlemann; Gail Taylor; John Barrett; Felix Eigenbrod
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparing two periphyton collection methods commonly used for stream bioassessment and the development of numeric nutrient standards.

Authors:  Ashley R Rodman; J Thad Scott
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Diel Dynamics of Freshwater Bacterial Communities at Beaches in Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair, Windsor, Ontario.

Authors:  Abdolrazagh Hashemi Shahraki; Subba Rao Chaganti; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Groundwater declines are linked to changes in Great Plains stream fish assemblages.

Authors:  Joshuah S Perkin; Keith B Gido; Jeffrey A Falke; Kurt D Fausch; Harry Crockett; Eric R Johnson; John Sanderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Fog-to-Water for Water Scarcity in Climate-Change Hazards Hotspots: Pilot Study in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Zaitizila Ismail; Yun Ii Go
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Drought-induced changes in flow regimes lead to long-term losses in mussel-provided ecosystem services.

Authors:  Caryn C Vaughn; Carla L Atkinson; Jason P Julian
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  The Impact of Conservation Management on the Community Composition of Multiple Organism Groups in Eutrophic Interconnected Man-Made Ponds.

Authors:  Pieter Lemmens; Joachim Mergeay; Jeroen Van Wichelen; Luc De Meester; Steven A J Declerck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Acidic, neutral and alkaline forest ponds as a landscape element affecting the biodiversity of freshwater snails.

Authors:  Aneta Spyra
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-08-22

9.  Do fish get wasted? Assessing the influence of effluents on parasitic infection of wild fish.

Authors:  Christyn Bailey; Aurélie Rubin; Nicole Strepparava; Helmut Segner; Jean-François Rubin; Thomas Wahli
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Assessing the sustainability of freshwater systems: A critical review of composite indicators.

Authors:  Derek Vollmer; Helen M Regan; Sandy J Andelman
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.