| Literature DB >> 35012071 |
Dmitriy E Burmistrov1, Alexander V Simakin1, Veronika V Smirnova1, Oleg V Uvarov1, Petr I Ivashkin1, Roman N Kucherov1,2, Vladimir E Ivanov1,3, Vadim I Bruskov3, Mihail A Sevostyanov4, Alexander S Baikin4, Valery A Kozlov5, Maksim B Rebezov1,6, Anastasia A Semenova6, Andrey B Lisitsyn6, Maria V Vedunova7, Sergey V Gudkov1,7.
Abstract
A low-temperature technology was developed for producing a nanocomposite based on poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs), synthesized by laser ablation. Nanocomposites were created containing 0.001, 0.01, and 0.1% of zinc oxide nanoparticles with rod-like morphology and a size of 40-70 nm. The surface of the films from the obtained nanomaterial was uniform, without significant defects. Clustering of ZnO-NPs in the PLGA matrix was noted, which increased with an increase in the concentration of the dopant in the polymer. The resulting nanomaterial was capable of generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals. The rate of ROS generation increased with an increase in the concentration of the dopant. It was shown that the synthesized nanocomposite promotes the formation of long-lived reactive protein species, and is also the reason for the appearance of a key biomarker of oxidative stress, 8-oxoguanine, in DNA. The intensity of the process increased with an increase in the concentration of nanoparticles in the matrix. It was found that the nanocomposite exhibits significant bacteriostatic properties, the severity of which depends on the concentration of nanoparticles. In particular, on the surface of the PLGA-ZnO-NPs composite film containing 0.001% nanoparticles, the number of bacterial cells was 50% lower than that of pure PLGA. The surface of the composite is non-toxic to eukaryotic cells and does not interfere with their adhesion, growth, and division. Due to its low cytotoxicity and bacteriostatic properties, this nanocomposite can be used as coatings for packaging in the food industry, additives for textiles, and also as a material for biomedicine.Entities:
Keywords: PLGA; antibacterial; biocompatibility; composite; cytotoxicity; nanoparticles; poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); zinc oxide
Year: 2021 PMID: 35012071 PMCID: PMC8747160 DOI: 10.3390/polym14010049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Physicochemical properties of ZnO-NPs. (a) Concentration (DLS, solid crimson line) and size distribution (CPS, black dashed line) of zinc oxide NPs. (b) Zeta potential of zinc oxide NPs. (c) Optical absorption of an aqueous colloidal solution of zinc oxide NPs. (d) TEM image of a group of zinc oxide NPs.
Figure 2Elemental analysis of zinc oxide NPs. (a) TEM image of group of zinc oxide NPs, analysis section is indicated by line 1. (b) Enlarged measurement site. (c) Nanoparticle profile by Zn Kα1 and O Kα1.
Figure 3Reconstruction of the surface of a polymer and composites based on it, performed using an atomic force microscope in slow (a) and fast (b) scanning modes.
Figure 4Images obtained on polymer without nanoparticles (a) and polymers with ZnO nanoparticles at a concentration of 0.001% (b), 0.01% (c) and 0.1% (d) using a modulation interference microscope. A 3D reconstruction of the surface profile of a polymer and composites based on it is presented. The X and Y axes show the actual size of the investigated surface in micrometers. The Z-axis shows the surface relief as a phase change expressed in nm. In the lower left corner of each figure is a top view (surface elevation map).
Figure 5Thermograms of PLGA–ZnO in the heating and cooling mode (a); concentration dependences of changes in heat capacity (b); and glass transition temperature (c) of the PLGA–ZnO samples.
Figure 6Spectral properties of a nanocomposite polymer material containing PLGA and ZnO nanoparticles. (a) Absorption UV-Vis spectrum of composite polymer materials with different filling with zinc oxide nanoparticles. (b) FTIR spectrum of composite polymer materials with different filling with zinc oxide nanoparticles.
Figure 7Effect of composite material containing PGLA and ZnO nanoparticles on the generation of reactive oxygen species: (a) Formation of hydrogen peroxide (2 h, 40 °C); (b) Generation of hydroxyl radicals (2 h, 80 °C); * indicate a significant difference at 5% level in comparison with the control (p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean values and standard errors of main.
Figure 8The effect PGLA/ZnO-NPs composite on the biomacromolecules damage formation: (a) Generation of 8-oxo-G in DNA in vitro (2 h, 45 °C); (b) Formation and dynamics of decomposition of long-lived reactive protein species (2 h, 40 °C); * indicate a significant difference at 5% level in comparison with the control (p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean values and standard errors of main.
Figure 9Influence of composite material based on PGLA and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the growth and development of E. coli. * indicate a significant difference at 5% level in comparison with the control (p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean values and standard errors of main.
Figure 10The effect of the PLGA/NP composite on the main characteristics of the growth and development of cell culture after 72-h cultivation: (a) Influence of composite material on the viability of cell culture; (b) Influence of composite material on the mitotic index of a cells; (c) Influence of composite material on the cell culture density; (d) Influence of composite material on the colonization rate of free surface by cells. * indicate a significant difference at 5% level in comparison with the control (p < 0.05). ** indicate a significant difference at 5% level in comparison with the TiNbTaZr group (p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean values and standard errors of main.
The main parameters of ZnO-NPs–polymer composites reported in other modern research.
| No | Composition | D, nm | Bacterial Strains | Effect | MIC/MBC | Results | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chitosan-ZnO-NPs composite | - | BS *, BC | - | High antibacterial activity of the composite in comparison with pure chitosan | [ | |
| 2 | Nano-ZnO-high-density polyethylene (HDPE) composite films | ~300 | BS | 0.5 wt % | Nano-ZnO–HDPE composite films inhibited the antibacterial activity for | [ | |
| 3 | Cellulose-ZnO-NPs composite | 20–40 | BS | - | Cellulose–ZnO have advantages compared to ZnO with the antibacterial activity of the composite better than ZnO | [ | |
| 4 | carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) -carboxymethyl pullulan (CMP)–ZnO-NPs composites | ~9 | BS | - | Antibacterial activity against both bacteria under investigation | [ | |
| 5 | chitosan (CS)/carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)/ZnO-NPs composites | 48–77 | BS | - | All of the composites have antibacterial activities and the highest antibacterial activity related to the synthesized composite without nano ZnO in | [ | |
| 6 | gelatin films with ZnO-NPs incorporation | 80–100 | BS | - | The gelatin-based bio-nanocomposite films showed antibacterial properties against | [ | |
| 7 | poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) nanofibers incorporated with ZnO nanoparticles | ~54 | BS | MIC: for | PVA–ZnO composites exhibit antibacterial and wound healing properties | [ | |
| 8 | ZnO-NPs–cellulose nanocomposite | ~14 | BS | - | Dispersing ZnO on the cellulose matrix improves the photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO; ZnO–CNC showed enhanced antibacterial activity against both | [ | |
| 9 | PLA-PBAT-ZnO-NPs composite films | 50–150 | BS | - | Strong antibacterial activity against | [ | |
| 10 | Polypropylene (PP) -ZnO-NPs nanocomposites | 54–90 |
| BS | - | The PP–ZnO nanocomposites had better antibacterial properties than neat PP | [ |
* BS—bacteriostatic effect, BC—bactericidal effect.