Literature DB >> 24198489

Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness.

Threes G Smijs1, Stanislav Pavel.   

Abstract

Sunscreens are used to provide protection against adverse effects of ultraviolet (UV)B (290-320 nm) and UVA (320-400 nm) radiation. According to the United States Food and Drug Administration, the protection factor against UVA should be at least one-third of the overall sun protection factor. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) minerals are frequently employed in sunscreens as inorganic physical sun blockers. As TiO2 is more effective in UVB and ZnO in the UVA range, the combination of these particles assures a broad-band UV protection. However, to solve the cosmetic drawback of these opaque sunscreens, microsized TiO2 and ZnO have been increasingly replaced by TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) (<100 nm). This review focuses on significant effects on the UV attenuation of sunscreens when microsized TiO2 and ZnO particles are replaced by NPs and evaluates physicochemical aspects that affect effectiveness and safety of NP sunscreens. With the use of TiO2 and ZnO NPs, the undesired opaqueness disappears but the required balance between UVA and UVB protection can be altered. Utilization of mixtures of micro- and nanosized ZnO dispersions and nanosized TiO2 particles may improve this situation. Skin exposure to NP-containing sunscreens leads to incorporation of TiO2 and ZnO NPs in the stratum corneum, which can alter specific NP attenuation properties due to particle-particle, particle-skin, and skin-particle-light physicochemical interactions. Both sunscreen NPs induce (photo)cyto- and genotoxicity and have been sporadically observed in viable skin layers especially in case of long-term exposures and ZnO. Photocatalytic effects, the highest for anatase TiO2, cannot be completely prevented by coating of the particles, but silica-based coatings are most effective. Caution should still be exercised when new sunscreens are developed and research that includes sunscreen NP stabilization, chronic exposures, and reduction of NPs' free-radical production should receive full attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (photo) toxicity; TiO2; UV-radiation; ZnO; blue shift; cancer; nanoparticles; physicochemical; scattering; skin barrier

Year:  2011        PMID: 24198489      PMCID: PMC3781714          DOI: 10.2147/NSA.S19419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotechnol Sci Appl        ISSN: 1177-8903


  88 in total

1.  Clastogenicity, photo-clastogenicity or pseudo-photo-clastogenicity: Genotoxic effects of zinc oxide in the dark, in pre-irradiated or simultaneously irradiated Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  Eric K Dufour; Tirukalikundram Kumaravel; Gerhard J Nohynek; David Kirkland; Hervé Toutain
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Optical properties of fat emulsions.

Authors:  René Michels; Florian Foschum; Alwin Kienle
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  Nanotechnology and the transdermal route: A state of the art review and critical appraisal.

Authors:  Gregor Cevc; Ulrich Vierl
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  In vitro percutaneous absorption and in vivo stratum corneum distribution of an organic and a mineral sunscreen.

Authors:  A Mavon; C Miquel; O Lejeune; B Payre; P Moretto
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Surface modifications of ZnO nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Hong Yin; Philip S Casey; Maxine J McCall
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-11

6.  Stratum corneum is an effective barrier to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticle percutaneous absorption.

Authors:  P Filipe; J N Silva; R Silva; J L Cirne de Castro; M Marques Gomes; L C Alves; R Santus; T Pinheiro
Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 7.  Grey goo on the skin? Nanotechnology, cosmetic and sunscreen safety.

Authors:  Gerhard J Nohynek; Jürgen Lademann; Christele Ribaud; Michael S Roberts
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.635

8.  Nanostructured lipid carriers as novel carrier for sunscreen formulations.

Authors:  Q Xia; A Saupe; R H Müller; E B Souto
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.970

9.  Microfine zinc oxide (Z-cote) as a photostable UVA/UVB sunblock agent.

Authors:  M A Mitchnick; D Fairhurst; S R Pinnell
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 10.  Physicochemical factors that affect metal and metal oxide nanoparticle passage across epithelial barriers.

Authors:  Alison Elder; Sadasivan Vidyasagar; Lisa DeLouise
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug
View more
  87 in total

1.  Uptake and toxicity of nano-ZnO in the plant-feeding nematode, Xiphinema vuittenezi: the role of dissolved zinc and nanoparticle-specific effects.

Authors:  Zoltán Sávoly; Krisztina Hrács; Bernhard Pemmer; Christina Streli; Gyula Záray; Péter István Nagy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Sunscreens and their usefulness: have we made any progress in the last two decades?

Authors:  Nick Serpone
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Defect-induced electronic states amplify the cellular toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Indushekhar Persaud; Achyut J Raghavendra; Archini Paruthi; Nasser B Alsaleh; Valerie C Minarchick; James R Roede; Ramakrishna Podila; Jared M Brown
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 4.  Understanding engineered nanomaterial skin interactions and the modulatory effects of ultraviolet radiation skin exposure.

Authors:  Samreen Jatana; Lisa A DeLouise
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-03

Review 5.  Subchronic and chronic toxicity evaluation of inorganic nanoparticles for delivery applications.

Authors:  Raziye Mohammadpour; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Darwin L Cheney; Khaled F Greish; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Metal nanomaterials: Immune effects and implications of physicochemical properties on sensitization, elicitation, and exacerbation of allergic disease.

Authors:  Katherine A Roach; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Jenny R Roberts
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Pro-NP™ protect against TiO2 nanoparticle-induced phototoxicity in zebrafish model: exploring potential application for skin care.

Authors:  Min-Sik Kim; Melinda Stees; Bala Vamsi K Karuturi; Sivakumar Vijayaraghavalu; Richard E Peterson; Gary L Madsen; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.617

8.  Comparative study on toxicity of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles on Artemia salina: effect of pre-UV-A and visible light irradiation.

Authors:  M Bhuvaneshwari; Bhawana Sagar; Siddharth Doshi; N Chandrasekaran; Amitava Mukherjee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Comparative analysis of the relative potential of silver, Zinc-oxide and titanium-dioxide nanoparticles against UVB-induced DNA damage for the prevention of skin carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Nikhil Tyagi; Sanjeev K Srivastava; Sumit Arora; Yousef Omar; Zohaib Mohammad Ijaz; Ahmed Al-Ghadhban; Sachin K Deshmukh; James E Carter; Ajay P Singh; Seema Singh
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 8.679

10.  Zinc Oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative and proteotoxic stress in ovarian cancer cells and trigger apoptosis Independent of p53-mutation status.

Authors:  Achuth Padmanabhan; M Kaushik; R Niranjan; JoAnne S Richards; Brandon Ebright; G Devanand Venkatasubbu
Journal:  Appl Surf Sci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.707

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.