| Literature DB >> 35011545 |
Jed Jebali1, Hanene Ghazghazi2, Chedia Aouadhi3, Ines ELBini-Dhouib1, Ridha Ben Salem4, Najet Srairi-Abid1, Naziha Marrakchi1,5, Ghayth Rigane4,6.
Abstract
Mint species (Lamiaceae family) have been used as traditional remedies for the treatment of several diseases. In this work, we aimed to characterize the biological activities of the total phenolic and flavonoid contents of Mentha pulegium L. extracts collected from two different regions of Tunisia. The highest amounts of total phenols (74.45 ± 0.01 mg GAE/g DW), flavonoids (28.87 ± 0.02 mg RE/g DW), and condensed tannins (4.35 ± 0.02 mg CE/g DW) were found in the Bizerte locality. Methanolic leaf extracts were subjected to HPLC-UV analysis in order to identify and quantify the phenolic composition. This technique allowed us to identify seven phenolic compounds: two phenolic acids and five flavonoid compounds, such as eriocitrin, hesperidin, narirutin, luteolin, and isorhoifolin, which were found in both extracts with significant differences between samples collected from the different regions (p < 0.05). Furthermore, our results showed that the methanolic extract from leaves collected from Bizerte had the highest antioxidant activities (DPPH IC50 value of 16.31 μg/mL and 570.08 μmol Fe2+/g, respectively). Both extracts showed high radical-scavenging activity as well as significant antimicrobial activity against eight tested bacteria. The highest antimicrobial activities were observed against Gram-positive bacteria with inhibition zone diameters and MIC values ranging between 19 and 32 mm and 40 and 160 µg/mL, respectively. Interestingly, at 10 μg/mL, the extract had a significant effect on cell proliferation of U87 human glioblastoma cells. These findings open perspectives for the use of Mentha pulegium L. extract in green pharmacy, alternative/complementary medicine, and natural preventive therapies for the development of effective antioxidant, antibacterial, and/or antitumoral drugs.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; antiproliferative and antibacterial activities; medicinal plant; polyphenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35011545 PMCID: PMC8746529 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27010314
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Averages of total phenolic and flavonoid contents and condensed tannin in the methanol extracts of Mentha pulegium L. leaves. Values are given as mean ± standard deviations (p < 0.05).
| Locality | Total Phenol | Flavonoids | Tannins |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 74.45 ± 0.01 | 28.87 ± 0.02 | 4.35 ± 0.02 |
|
| 57.43 ± 0.05 | 25.67 ± 0.1 | 1.57 ± 0.1 |
Figure 1HPLC chromatograms of Mentha pulegium L. methanolic extracts (Bizerte (A) and Kef (B)). Peaks: 1, caffeic acid; 2, eriocitrin; 3, isorhoifolin; 4, luteolin; 5, narirutin; 6, hesperidin; and 7, rosmarinic acid detected at 280 nm.
Contents of Mentha pulegium L. polyphenolic compounds determined by HPLC (p < 0.05).
| Identified Compound | Retention (min) | Content of Compounds | Calibration Coefficient (r2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bizerte | Kef | |||
| caffeic acid | 10.50 | 8.55 ± 0.14 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.999 |
| eriocitrin | 12.50 | 25.3 ± 0.02 | 20.1 ± 0.10 | 0.999 |
| isorhoifolin | 14.00 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.10 | 0.989 |
| luteolin | 15.50 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.998 |
| narirutin | 16.25 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.988 |
| hesperidin | 17.50 | 0.75 ± 0.01 | 0.5 ± 0.08 | 0.993 |
| rosmarinic acid | 18.50 | 12.65 ± 0.10 | 9.5 ± 0.08 | 0.994 |
Mean values of three independent experiments ± standard deviations. −r2: Calibration graphs were generated using five calibration solutions. All graphs were linear in the examined range (0.05–0.50 mg/mL) (p < 0.05).
Antioxidant activities of methanolic extracts from Tunisian Mentha pulegium L. Values are given as mean ± SD (n = 3) (p < 0.05).
| Locality | DPPH (IC50, μg/mL) | FRAP (μmol Fe2+/g) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 16.31 ± 0.94 | 570.08 ± 0.85 |
|
| 19.08 ± 0.83 | 481.01 ± 0.96 |
Antibacterial activity of methanolic extracts of Mentha pulegium L. leaves determined by the disc diffusion method (p < 0.05).
| Inhibition Zone Diameters (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| 0.1 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2 | (15 µg/disc) | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 11 ± 0.37 | 15 ± 0.33 | 21 ± 0.33 | 9 ± 0.3 | 13 ± 0.22 | 19 ± 0.1 | + |
|
| 13 ± 0.0 | 19 ± 0.35 | 25 ± 0.22 | 8 ± 0.1 | 17 ± 0.2 | 22 ± 0.5 | 24 ± 0.0 |
|
| 12 ± 0.35 | 18 ± 0.3 | 24 ± 0.35 | 9 ± 0.22 | 15 ± 0.5 | 22 ± 0.3 | 20 ± 0.0 |
|
| 11 ± 0.25 | 19 ± 0.22 | 23 ± 0.25 | 9 ± 0.33 | 16 ± 0.1 | 20 ± 0.2 | 21 ± 0.0 |
|
| |||||||
|
| 21 ± 0.15 | 25 ± 0.3 | 33 ± 0.22 | 19 ± 0.1 | 22 ± 0.22 | 30 ± 0.1 | 27 ± 0.0 |
|
| 17 ± 0.22 | 24 ± 0.1 | 31 ± 0.33 | 12 ± 0.2 | 22 ± 0.22 | 29 ± 0.3 | 25 ± 0.0 |
|
| 20 ± 0.5 | 25 ± 0.3 | 32 ± 0.15 | 13 ± 0.3 | 22 ± 0.33 | 22 ± 0.0 | 23 ± 0.0 |
| Enterococcus | 15 ± 0.5 | 24 ± 0.2 | 30 ± 0.3 | 12 ± 0.2 | 20 ± 0.3 | 26 ± 0.33 | + |
+: growth.
Results of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of methanolic extracts of Mentha pulegium L.
| MIC (µg/mL) | MBC (µg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bizerte | Kef | Bizerte | Kef | |
|
| ||||
|
| 80 | 160 | 160 | 320 |
|
| 80 | 160 | 160 | 320 |
|
| 40 | 80 | 80 | 160 |
|
| 80 | 160 | 160 | 320 |
|
| ||||
|
| 40 | 160 | 80 | 320 |
|
| 40 | 80 | 80 | 160 |
|
| 40 | 80 | 80 | 160 |
|
| 80 | 160 | 160 | 320 |
Figure 2Effect of methanolic extract of Mentha pulegium L. from the Bizerte locality on U87 cells: (A) Cells were treated with the extract at the indicated concentrations for 24 h, and cell viability was assessed by MTT assay. The cell viability of the vehicle control cells was assumed as 100%. (B) The methanolic extract from the Bizerte locality inhibited U87 cell proliferation. U87 cells were cultured in MEM containing 10% FCS for the indicated periods of time in the absence (control) or in the presence of 10 µg/mL of extract. At daily intervals, U87 cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde, stained with a solution of 0.1% crystal violet/MetOH 20%, and lysed with 1% SDS. Absorbance was then measured at 590 nm. All data represent the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments performed in triplicate (p < 0.05).