| Literature DB >> 35010186 |
Marina Cano-Lamadrid1, Francisco Artés-Hernández2.
Abstract
The aim of this review is to provide comprehensive information about non-thermal technologies applied in fruit and vegetables (F&V) by-products to enhance their phytochemicals and to obtain pectin. Moreover, the potential use of such compounds for food supplementation will also be of particular interest as a relevant and sustainable strategy to increase functional properties. The thermal instability of bioactive compounds, which induces a reduction of the content, has led to research and development during recent decades of non-thermal innovative technologies to preserve such nutraceuticals. Therefore, ultrasounds, light stresses, enzyme assisted treatment, fermentation, electro-technologies and high pressure, among others, have been developed and improved. Scientific evidence of F&V by-products application in food, pharmacologic and cosmetic products, and packaging materials were also found. Among food applications, it could be mentioned as enriched minimally processed fruits, beverages and purees fortification, healthier and "clean label" bakery and confectionary products, intelligent food packaging, and edible coatings. Future investigations should be focused on the optimization of 'green' non-thermal and sustainable-technologies on the F&V by-products' key compounds for the full-utilization of raw material in the food industry.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive compounds; circular economy; green technologies; nutraceuticals; zero waste
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010186 PMCID: PMC8750753 DOI: 10.3390/foods11010059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Classification of the main phytochemical compounds in fruit and vegetables (F&V) by-products.
Figure 2Types of the main bioactive pigments and examples of some fruits and vegetable (F&V) by-products rich in these pigments [8,32,38,39].
Figure 3Flow diagram describing the study selection process of the scientific literature.
Effect of non-thermal technologies on F&V b-products polyphenols (flavonols, total polyphenols, flavonoids).
| Non-Thermal Technology | By-Product | Findings | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Solid-state Fermentation | Plum pomace | Increase of quercentin-3-glucoside (23 to 34 mg/100 g dry matter by | [ |
| Solid-state Fermentation | Plum brandy distilleries waste | Increase of quercentin-3-glucoside (92 to 120 mg/100 g dry matter by | [ | |
| Ultrasound assisted solid liquid extraction | Skins of red and yellow onions | Recovery of quercetin aglycona (118%) after extracted eight times with 20 mL Ethanol (85% | [ | |
|
| High hydrostatic pressure | Orange and lemon peels | More intense HPP conditions (500 MPa, 10 min), polyphenols decrease (lemon: 291.08 to 211.95 mg GAE/100 g fresh peel extracts; orange: 400 to 215.31 mg GAE/100 g fresh peel extracts). | [ |
| High hydrostatic pressure | Pineapple by-products | Accumulation of bromelain (increase of 350%) and TPC (increase of 36%) at 225 MPa, 8.5 min | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Mango peel | Recovery of polyphenols (+400%) at E = 13.3 kV/cm (160 kJ/kg); V = 40 kV (160 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Olive kernel | Recovery of polyphenols E = 13.3 kV/cm (0–141 kJ/kg), V = 40 kV (0–141 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Orange peel | Up to 159% in polyphenol extraction recovery after PEF pre-treatment at an electric field densities 1 kV/cm and 7 kV/cm (60 μs, 20 pulses, f = 1 Hz). | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Orange peel | Recovery of polyphenols (from 20%, to 159%) for orange peel PEF treated at E = 1–7 kV/cm (0.06–3.77 kJ/kg) + Pressing 5 bars | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Papaya peel and seeds | Recovery of polyphenols (>50%) at E = 13.3 kV/cm (160 kJ/kg); V = 40 kV (160 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Raspseeds stems and leaves | Recovery polyphenols (36–42%) at E = 0.2–5 kV/cm (0–700 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Raspseeds seeds | Recovery polyphenols (around 50%) at V = 40 kV (0–400 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Winery wastes and by-products (peel) | Recovery of polyphenols (42%) E = 5–10 kV/cm (1.8–6.7 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Winery wastes and by-products (pomace) | Recovery of polyphenols (>40%) at E = 13.3 kV/cm (0–564 kJ/kg) V = 40 kV (0–218 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Winery wastes and by-products (seed) | Recovery of polyphenols (>40%) at E = 8–20 kV/cm (0–53 kJ/kg) V = 40 kV (0–53 kJ/kg) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Fermented grapes pomace | Increase of recovery by 1.2 kV/cm 18 kJ/kg 20 °C (the ratio of total anthocyanins to total flavan-3-ols was increased from 7.1 in non-treated to 9.0 in PEF-treated samples) | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Winery wastes and by-products (grapes) | Increase 13% at 0.5 kV/cm, 50 pulses, 0.1 kJ/kg | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Winery wastes and by-products (grapes) | Increase 34% at 0.7 kV/cm, 200 ms, 31 Wh/kg | [ | |
| Electro-technologies | Winery wastes and by-products (vine shoots) | Up to 2-fold increase in TPC (Kaempferol, epicatechin, resveratrol) at 13.3 kV/cm, 0–1500 pulses, 50–762 kJ/kg/3 h compared to untreated | [ | |
| Electro-tecnologies | Citrus peel (orange and pomelo) | Increase of polyphenols recovery, 16 mg/g dry matter for skins (for albedo + flavedo) (E = 10 kV/cm and 50% ethanol solution) | [ | |
| Enzymed-assisted extraction | Grape residues | Novoferm® (1:10, 12 h and 40 °C) had the strongest effect on phenolic release (90%) from grape waste (100 mg of dry material was suspended in 1.4 mL of 0.2 M acetates buffer (pH 3.5)). | [ | |
| Light stress | Bimi broccoli leaves and stalks | UV increased initial TPC of leaves/stalks up to 31–97/30–75%, 10 kJ/m2 UV-B (UV-B10) + C induced the highest TPC increase (110%) in leaves while UV-B10 and UV-B10 + C led to the highest TPC of stalks after 48 h | [ | |
| Optimized supercritical Fluid Extraction | Broccoli by-products | Decrease of polyphenols (<20%) at 400 bars, 40 °C, 5% of ethanol compared with conventional treatment | [ | |
| Solid-state Fermentation | Plum brandy distilleries waste | Increase of 3-Caffeoylquinic acid (33 to 53 mg/100 g dry matter by | [ | |
| Solid-state Fermentation | Plum pomace | Increase of 5-Caffeoylquinic acid (22 to 24 mg/100 g dry matter by | [ | |
| Subcritical/critical Fluid Extraction | White grape seeds | Improved recovery of gallic acid, catechin, and epicatechin (>70%) at 1 mL/min CO2 flow rate, 20 min extraction, 35 °C, organic modifier density (0.85–0.95 g/mL), modifier (ethanol-methanol: 10–40). | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Grape marc | Increase of 11–35% at 24 kHz, 20–75 W/mL | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Orange peel | Recovery of caffeic (207%), p-coumaric (180%), ferulic (192%), sinapic acid (66%), and p-hydroxybenzoic (94%) at 25 KHz, 150 W, 15 min | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Orange peel | Recovery of naringin (38%), hesperidin (42%), TPC (31%) at 25 kHz, 50–150 W, 60 min | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Winery wastes and by-products (grapes) | Increase of 7% (sum of anthocyanins and tannins) at 24 kHz, 5–15 min, 121–363 kJ/kg | [ | |
|
| Pulsed electric fields | Orange peel | Increase at 5 kV/cm and 20 pulses | [ |
Effect of non-thermal technologies on F&V by-products pigments (anthocyanins, betalains, carotenoids and chlorophylls).
| Non-Thermal Technology | By-Product | Findings | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Electro-technologies | Winery wastes and by-products (pomace) | Recovery of polyphenols (>20%) at E = 13.3 kV/cm (0–564 kJ/kg) V = 40 kV (0–218 kJ/kg) | [ |
| High pressure | Wine by-products | Recovery of 41% at 600 MPa, 60 min/solvent (50–50% ethanol in water) | [ | |
| High pressure | Wine by-products | Recovery of 22–83% at 200–600 MPa, 30–90 min, solvent (20–80%; 100–0% ethanol in water) | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Blueberry pomace | Increase of Delphinidin, Cyanidin, Petunidin, Peonidin, and Malvidin. 51%, 71% and 95% at 1 kV/cm, 3 kV/cm, and 5 kV/cm, respectively | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Blueberry by-product | Anthocyanin extraction increased (>30%) with PEF process intensification (1–35 kV/cm; 1–10–41 kJ/kg; 10 Hz, 2–100 pulses, 2 μs | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Grape by-product | Improved anthocyanin extraction (up to 18.9%) at 1.2, 1.8, and 3.0 kV/cm, 18 kJ/kg, 200–2000 pulses, 100 μs | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Plum by-product | No increase anthocyanins at 37.8–289.8 W, 0.7–25.2 pulses, 10 Hz, 6 μs | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Peach by-product | Improved anthocyanin extraction (up to 11.8-fold) at 0.8 kV/cm, 0.2 kJ/kg; 0.1 Hz 4 μs | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Raspberry by-product | Increase 27.5% at 1 kV/cm, 6 kJ/kg, 20 Hz and 20 μs | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Sour cherry by-product | Improved anthocyanin extraction (up to 54%); 1 kV/cm, 10 kJ/kg, 10 Hz, 20 μs | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Sweet cherry by-product | Improved anthocyanin extraction (up to 38.4%) at 0.5 kV/cm, 10 kJ/kg, 5 Hz, 20 μs | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Winery wastes and by-products (grapes) | Increase of anthocyanins: 3-fold at 3 kV/cm 50 pulses; 1.6 and 2-fold ↑ 5 kV/cm 1 ms | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Winery wastes and by-products (grapes) | Increase of 51–62% at 0.8–5 kV/cm, 1–100 ms, 42–53 kJ/kg | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Winery wastes and by-products (grapes) | Increased anthocyanin content (1.6–1.9 fold more) at 5 kV/cm, 1 ms, 48 kJ/kg | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Winery wastes and by-products (pomace) | Increase of Anthocyanins (2-fold more) at 13.3 kV/cm, 0–564 kJ/kg | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Blueberry by-products | Increase of anthoycanin extraction (3 fold more) (PEF: 60% ethanol 1:6 and 20 kV/cm; Ultrasounds: 1:6, 40 °C, 60 min at 125 W) | [ | |
| Subcritical/critical | Grape skin | Recovery of 85% at 100–130 bar, pH of 2–4, 25–30% ethanol, 25–50 mL/min CO2 flow, and 3–10% extract flow ratio | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Eggplant by-product | US-assisted extraction (15–45 min) was preferable to conventional solid-liquid extraction due to the lower temperature (25 °C) used and higher delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside content (1.5 fold more). | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Jabuticaba by-products | The highest concentration at 1.1 W/cm2, 3 min, 10 KHz | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Pomegranate peel | 116 W sonication power with 80% duty cycle for 6 min for extraction of 22.51 mg cyanidin-3-glucosides/100 g pomegranate peel. | [ | |
|
| Pulsed electric fields | Total colorants to ≈80 mg/100 g FW (20 kV, frequency of 0.5 Hz, number of pulses of 50) | [ | |
| Pulsed electric fields | Red pricky pear peels | Increase of 2.4 fold colorants (betanin and isobetanin) at 8–23 kV/cm 50–300 pulses + aqueous extraction | [ | |
| Ultrasound | Total colorants to ≈80 mg/100 g FW (400 W power at 24 kHz frequency for 5–15 min) | [ | ||
|
| Electro-technologies | Olive kernel | Recovery of polyphenols (2-fold more) E = 13.3 kV/cm (0–141 kJ/kg), V = 40 kV (0–141 kJ/kg) | [ |
| Microemulsion | Tomato pomace | Recovery of lycopene (>20%). The optimal conditions (tomato pomace: double distilled water 1:6): combined ultrasound (20–37 W, amplitude 90% and sonication temperature of 10 °C for 15 min) and enzyme pretreatments (0.2 mL/kg, 30 min, pH 4, 35 °C), saponin as a natural surfactant, and glycerol as a co-surfactant. | [ | |
| Pulsed Electric Fields | Tomato waste | Recovery of 12–18% of lycopene in acetone and ethyl lactate extracts at 5 kJ/Kg and 5 kV/cm (20 °C). | [ | |
| Supercritical Fluid Extraction | Broccoli by-products | Decrease of beta-carotene (>10%) compared with conventional treatment at 400 bars, 5% of ethanol | [ | |
| Supercritical fluid extraction | F&V waste: | Total carotenoid recovery values were greater than 90% | [ | |
| Ultrasound | Orange processing waste | Optimization of β-carotene extraction with enzyme assisted technology at 20 kHz, 500 W and 25 °C | [ | |
| Ultrasound | Red pricky pear peels | Increase of 2.6 fold colorants (betanin and isobetanin) at 400 W 5–15 min + aqueous extraction | [ | |
| Ultrasound | Tomato pomace | Lycopene increase (>10%) at 25–40 °C, 0–10 min, 0–100 kPa; 58–94 μm; Hexane %: 25–75 | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Tomato peel | 5-fold lower all-trans lycopene content by ultrasounds (30 min 0 °C) compared to thermal extraction (75 °C, 1–2 h). | [ | |
|
| Electro-technologies | Olive kernel | Recovery of polyphenols (>30%) E = 13.3 kV/cm (0–141 kJ/kg), V = 40 kV (0–141 kJ/kg) | [ |
| Supercritical Fluid Extraction | Broccoli by-products | Increase of chlorophylls (>10%) at 400 bars, and 5% of ethanol | [ |
Effect of non-thermal technologies on F&V by-products pectin and sulfur components content.
| Non-Thermal Technology | By-Product | Findings | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Enzymes | Apple Pomace | Recovery of 14% by Celluclast 18 h | [ |
| Enzymes | Kiwi pomace | Recovery of 4% by celluclast 25 °C 0.5 h | [ | |
| Enzymes | Passion fruit pomace | Recovery of 2.6–9.2% by Cellyclast 0.5–2 h | [ | |
| Enzymes | Lime peel | Recovery of 26% by Validase TRL 4 h | [ | |
| High pressure | Cactus pear peel | Increase of 22% soluble pectin at 600 MPa 10 min | [ | |
| High pressure | Cactus pear peel | Increase of 9% insoluble pectin at 600 MPa 10 min | [ | |
| High pressure | Mango peel | Increase of 15% soluble pectin at 600 MPa 10 min | [ | |
| High pressure | Orange peel | Increase of 59% soluble pectin at 600 MPa 10 min | [ | |
| High pressure | Passion fruit peel | Recovery of pectin was increased from 7.4 to 14.3% due to HPP pre-treatment. | [ | |
| High pressure | Tomato peel | 300 MPa pressure performed at 10, 20, 30, and 45 min. 14–15% of pectin recovery at 30 and 45 min | [ | |
| Moderate electric field | Passion fruit peel | Increase of galacturonic acid (GA) (recovery and content) at 40 min; 100 V; pH 1 (GA); pH 3 (Recovery) | [ | |
| Ultrasounds | Grapefruit peel | Recovery of 18.2% by 30 °C 10–60 min, 0.2–0.53 W/mL | [ | |
| Ultrasounds-enzyme assisted extraction without or with hemicellulase or cellulase | Discarded carrots | The pectin was rich in α- and β-carotenes, lutein and α-tocopherol. US-hemicellulase led to the highest pectin recovery (27.1%) at 12.27 W/cm2: 20 kHz, 80% amplitude, 20 min | [ | |
|
| Electro-technologies | Raspseeds seeds | Recovery of isothyocyanates (>15%) at V = 40 kV (0–400 kJ/kg) | [ |
| Light stress | Bimi broccoli leaves and stalks | UV-B (10 kJ/m2) + C increased 34% of glucobrassicin levels of leaves | [ |