Literature DB >> 32351951

Fruits By-Products - A Source of Valuable Active Principles. A Short Review.

Radu C Fierascu1,2, Elwira Sieniawska3, Alina Ortan1, Irina Fierascu1,2, Jianbo Xiao4.   

Abstract

The growing demand for more sustainable, alternative processes leading to production of plant-derived preparations imposes the use of plants waste generated mainly by agri-food and pharmaceutical industries. These mostly unexploited but large quantities of plants waste also increase the interest in developing alternative approaches for sustainable production of therapeutic molecules. In order to reduce the amount of plant waste by further processing, different novel extraction techniques can be applied. Fruits and their industrial by-products are rich sources of different classes of compounds with therapeutic properties. The processed fruits waste can be reused and lead to novel pharmaceuticals, food supplements or functional foods. This review intends to briefly summarize recent aspects regarding the production of different active compounds from fruit by-products, and their therapeutic properties. The potential use of fruits by-products in different industries will be also discussed.
Copyright © 2020 Fierascu, Sieniawska, Ortan, Fierascu and Xiao.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active compounds; fruits processing; fruits waste; side streams; therapeutic properties; value added products

Year:  2020        PMID: 32351951      PMCID: PMC7174504          DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol        ISSN: 2296-4185


Introduction

According to the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization, the production of different fruits around the world exceeded one billion tones in 2017, which, depending on geographical areas, consumption and growing traditions, inevitably leads to the generation of large amounts of by-products and waste (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2017). Only Europe generates approximately 100 Mt of waste and by-products each year, being an outcome of drinks industry (26%), as well as fruits and vegetables companies (14.8%) (Marić et al., 2018). The management of by-products resulted from fruits processing is one of the major problems of agri-food industries. Large quantities of waste containing a rich composition of biological compounds can be considered hazardous as may cause phytotoxicity phenomena, including plant growth interference, contamination of the aqueous media, deterioration of drinking water quality, death of sensitive marine organisms, inhibition of seed germination, and intestinal disorders in fed animals (Klapa, 2015). Even if these large amounts of waste can lead to environmental issues, at the same time, with a proper treatment, they can represent a low-cost raw material, rich in potentially valuable components for other industries (Rabetafika et al., 2014). Applying various extraction and purification techniques and analytical methods, it is possible to recover important bioactive components from fruits waste and further transform them into added value products for other industries (Nile et al., 2019). Removal, proper disposal and bio-waste processing can lead to the closure of bio-economical value chains, providing the opportunity to reduce serious environmental concerns regarding food waste. The most common fruits consumed worldwide are apples, grapes, and exotic fruits typical for the cultivation region. Apples are the most popular fruits that provide production of juice and cider production in over three million tons in Europe (Barreira et al., 2019) and about 5 million tons in United States each year (Niglio et al., 2019). The remaining residual material after processing is pomace, which consists of peels, skin, pulp, leftover flesh, core with seeds and stems, being rich in polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, and phenolic acids (Coman et al., 2019). Apple pomace contains larger amounts of bioactive substances compared to the juices from the fruit itself (Michalska and Łysiak, 2014). According to international statistics, grapes are world’s largest fruit crop, with an annual production of over 75 million of tons worldwide (International Organisation of Vine and Wine [OIV], 2017). In this context, grapes and products obtained, such as wine, grape juice, jams, have an obvious economic importance and a considerable impact on production of waste. The marc, peels and grape seeds resulting from wine industry remain deposited due to the lack of a proper management, thus being a source of contamination. On the other hand, grape waste represents a good source of vitamins, minerals, lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and polyphenolic compounds (especially phenolic acids, ellagitannins, flavonols, flavan-3-ols such as catechins and their isomers, anthocyanins, pro-anthocyanidins and the stilbene derivative, resveratrol) (Nowshehri et al., 2015). Grape wastes are not considered hazardous waste, but in large amounts they can contribute to the pollution, due to the high chemical and biological oxygen demand (Martinez et al., 2016). Other fruits with a large production are the exotic fruits like coffee, macadamia, pineapple, papaya, and mango. They are rich in vitamins, carotenoids, phenolic compounds and dietary fiber distributed in different parts of the fruits (pericarp, peels or seeds) (Ayala-Zavala et al., 2011). In this context, our short review intends to present a critical opinion on aspects regarding the production of active compounds from different fruits by-products, their therapeutic properties and the potential use of fruit by-products in different industries, being a link for researchers from different sciences: chemistry, pharmacology and medicine.

Production of Active Principles From Fruit By-Products

Scientific development registered in the last decades in the field of extraction of biologically active molecules enables the valorization and consequently utilization of fruit processing by-products. Thousands of valuable molecules generated from fruits waste can be used in food, cosmetic, or pharma industry (Mourtzinos and Goula, 2019). In order to obtain added-value products, extraction methods have to be elaborated for each side-product generated from agro-food industries (Bustamante et al., 2008). Traditional methods are still in use, even if they cause high consumption of energy and sometimes degradation of thermolabile compounds. Sustainable methods are continuously developed by improving and optimizing the existing processes following the principles of green chemistry (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Different classes of compounds extracted from fruit by-products and their potential industrial application.

FruitFruit by-productActive principleExtraction methodReferenceIndustrial applicationReference
GrapeGrape marc, skin, pomace, seedsPolyphenolsSupercritical fluid extraction; microwave extraction; ultrasound-assisted extraction; enzyme-aided extraction; pulsed electric fields processing; high voltage electrical dischargesKelly et al., 2019Food industryAndrade et al., 2019
Wine lessPolyphenolsClassical extraction with microwave and ultrasounds as pre-treatmentsRomero-Díez et al., 2019Pharmaceutic, cosmetic industry and biofuel productionBanerjee et al., 2017
Grape marcPectinsUltrasound-assisted extractionMinjares-Fuentes et al., 2014
SkinPhenolic compoundsNatural deep eutectic solvents (NADES) ultrasonic extractionRadosevic et al., 2016
PomaceAnthocyaninsSolid liquid extraction using ionic liquid solutionsLima et al., 2017
Grape marcMonomeric anthocyanins, phenolic compoundsPressurized liquid extractionPereira et al., 2019
SeedsPhenolic compounds, anthocyaninsUltrasound-assisted extractionGhafoor et al., 2009
PomacePhenolic compoundsEnzymatic extraction processMeini et al., 2019Beverage industryReissner et al., 2019
PomaceAnthocyaninsEnzymatic extraction process using brewery’s yeast biomassStafussa et al., 2016
Winery grape wasteCellulose, hemicelluloses and ligninEnzymatic extraction processKarpe et al., 2014
Pomace, seeds, skins and stemsPhenolic compoundsHigh voltage electrical dischargesBoussetta et al., 2012
PomacePullulanSubmerged fermentationSingh et al., 2019Packaging materialsSingh et al., 2019
CoffeeSpent ground coffeePhenolic compoundsHigh voltage electrical dischargesBoussetta et al., 2012Fructooligosaccharides productionde la Rosa et al., 2019
ApplePomacePhenolic compoundsSupercritical fluid extractionFerrentino et al., 2018Production of microbial oils, application as biofuelLiu et al., 2019
Cosmetic industryBarreira et al., 2019
Bioethanol productionEvcan and Tari, 2015
MangoPeelsCarotenoids, phenolics and flavonoidsSupercritical CO2 extraction followed by pressurized ethanol from the residue of the first stageGarcia-Mendoza et al., 2015Food and pharmaceutical industryRuiz-Montañez et al., 2014
PeelsPhenolic compoundsPulsed electric fields; high voltage electrical dischargesParniakov et al., 2015
OrangePeelsEssential oil, polyphenols and pectinUltrasound and microwave extractionBoukroufa et al., 2015Fructooligosaccharides productionde la Rosa et al., 2019
OrangePeelsFerulic acidSolid liquid extraction using deep eutectic solventsOzturk et al., 2018
Different classes of compounds extracted from fruit by-products and their potential industrial application. The most common target compounds from fruit by-products are polyphenols present in skins, pulp, seeds, or pomace (Kelly et al., 2019). They are unstable in high temperatures, which significantly reduces their concentration levels, therefore extraction at elevated temperatures is not recommended for these compounds. Hence, classical solid-liquid extraction techniques should be replaced with the state-of-the-art techniques. However, in this case, equipment needed and optimization parameters are important issues for obtaining active compounds from by-products. The most suitable and frequently used for isolation of polyphenolic compounds from fruits by-products are extraction techniques involving pressure, microwave and ultrasounds. In order to increase the yield of bioactive compounds and decrease amount of solvents used, and energy consumption, extraction techniques usually involve some pre-treatment and post-treatment processes. Pre-treatment processes are typically applied to remove lignin, reduce cellulose crystallinity and increase cell porosity (Kumar et al., 2009). Polyphenols non-covalently interact with polysaccharides and become non-extractable by polar solvents (Pérez-Jiménez et al., 2013). Pre-treatment releases polyphenols from the matrix and determines higher yields. When Romero-Díez et al. (2019) performed conventional solid-liquid extraction preceded by microwaves (MW) and ultrasounds (US) pre-treatments, the yield of anthocyanins from wine lees was doubled. As stated before, the application of modern extraction techniques results in increased yields of different active compounds (Minjares-Fuentes et al., 2014; Manna et al., 2015; Ferrentino et al., 2018; Zachová et al., 2018; Pereira et al., 2019). The advantages of pressurized liquid extraction (super and sub-critical fluid extraction) are low processing temperature (removing the possibility of thermal degradation of phytochemicals), the ease of separation with no solvent residue in the recovered substance, and the minimization of undesirable oxidation reactions. However, this technique presents a major disadvantage, as it can be applied only for isolation of compounds of low or medium polarity (Garcia-Salas et al., 2010). In microwave assisted techniques, electromagnetic radiation causes the rupture of cell walls in plant material in a short time. By applying a solvent that absorbs microwaves energy and has a good affinity with extracted compounds, an increased polyphenols yield can be easily obtained. The disadvantages of this method are the inflammability of the solvents and the multitude of parameters to be optimized (Garcia-Salas et al., 2010). Ultrasound assisted techniques are also advantageous, requiring lower temperatures, lower quantities of solvents, and favoring the solubilization of the targeted compounds. However, the formation of free radicals during extraction process is a drawback which should be mentioned (Ghafoor et al., 2009). The methods described above are also adequate to be used for recovery of compounds such as pigments (Garcia-Mendoza et al., 2015), essential oils or pectins (Boukroufa et al., 2015). Other green extraction method includes the application of enzymes or acids. The main benefit of enzymatic extraction is the shorter processing time, minimization of organic solvent used, increased purity and larger quantity of bioactive components. This method is appropriate for increasing the extractability of polyphenols, covering usually non-extractable proanthocyanidins (Radenkovs et al., 2018). Meini et al. (2019) demonstrated the positive effect of pectinase, cellulase and tannase on the release of phenolics from grape pomace matrix, while Stafussa et al. (2016) investigated the possibility to inter-connect two food industry by-products, using brewery’s yeast biomass as biosorbent of the anthocyanins from grape pomace. Also, various fungi such as Trichoderma, Aspergillus, and Penicillium sp. have been reported as biomass degraders due to their property to generate an array of enzymes such as endo- and exo-glucanases, β-glucosidase, xylanases, arabinofuranosidases and pectinases, obtaining cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin (Karpe et al., 2014). In the last decades, innovative technologies, like Pulsed Electric Fields (PEF), High Voltage Electrical Discharges (HVED) or Pulsed Ohmic Heating (POH) have been investigated, mostly for the recovery of phenolic compounds related to valorization of fruits wastes and by-products. PEF enabled to obtain high content of polyphenols from vine shoots (conventionally used as a heating source or left on the ground to rot) (Rajha et al., 2014). HVED provided the intensification of the extraction of total polyphenols from grape pomace, seeds, skins and stems, resulting in 7 times increased yield at both laboratory and pilot scale (Boussetta et al., 2012). The application of techniques involving electric energy allowed the selective recovery of valuable compounds from different fruits waste in a sustainable, economical, and environmentally friendly way (Parniakov et al., 2015). The important challenge in the recovery of phenolic compounds from fruits waste is the choice of the solvent used, which must meet the REACH characteristics (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals regulation) (Renard, 2018). Bio-based solvents, subcritical liquids, ionic liquids or (natural) deep eutectic solvents are now often used (Radosevic et al., 2016; Lima et al., 2017; Ozturk et al., 2018). These modern solvents present some advantages such as non-flammability, low toxicity, biocompatibility and the possibility to be obtained from renewable materials. Their properties can be tuned by modifying the hydrogen bond acceptor/donor structures or by changing the molar ratio of their components (Ozturk et al., 2018). Using these solvents, the yield of recovery of phenolic compounds can be enhanced by increasing the operating temperature without damaging active principles, due to the increased solubility and diffusion coefficients of polyphenolic compounds in the solvents. Their polarity can be changed by modifying their composition, so they can be used to solubilize a wide variety of bioactive compounds (Benvenutti et al., 2019). The economic feasibility of the extraction method depends on yield of recovery of active compounds. Due to the diversity of constituents present in fruit waste, a fractionation strategy would improve the efficiency and cost of the processes. When the process involves the recovery of several compounds from fruits by-products, a major concern to consider is the order of extraction. Due to mechanic processes like pressing, phenolic compounds may bind to cell wall, leading to decreased extraction yield. This interaction reduces also the extractability of pectins. Therefore, in any given process designed to obtain more than phenolic compounds, these should be extracted first. Moreover, the fact that the extraction process is time and solvent consuming, the order of extraction of the compounds can be the bottleneck of the entire biorefinery process (Perussello et al., 2017).

Therapeutic Properties of Active Compounds From Fruits By-Products

Therapeutic properties of bioactive compounds derived from fruits are widely described in the scientific literature. A number of reviews summarized anticancer, antidiabetic, antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, or neuroprotective activity of plant secondary metabolites extracted from fruits, underlining their importance in the human diet (Banerjee et al., 2017; Yalcin and Çapar, 2017; Karasawa and Mohan, 2018; Marli et al., 2018; van Breda and de Kok, 2018; Fidelis et al., 2019). Scientific information related to biological activities of raw fruits by-products is focused mainly on food applications. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of seeds, flesh, peels, or pulp waste are investigated in order to design novel functional foods enhancing human health and well-being (Park et al., 2014; Chougui et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2017; Zafra-Rojas et al., 2018; Saleem and Saeed, 2020). Since fruits by-products are mainly the outcome of food industry, the application of food waste within the same industry ensures circulation of the redundant food biomass and facilitates the waste management. Nevertheless, regardless the benefits which are obtained by processing fruits by-products within food industry, current preliminary scientific evidence confirms that fruits waste can be considered as a valuable source of phytoconstituents for medicinal applications. Anti-inflammatory potential of avocado peel and seed extracts was reported to suppress the release of tumor necrosis factor-α and generation of nitric oxide in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages (Tremocoldi et al., 2018). Gastroprotective activity was reported for avocado seeds extract against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice (Athaydes et al., 2019). Polyphenols extracted from orange flesh and peel were shown to protect human leukocytes against oxidative DNA damage and HepG2 cells against peroxyl radical-induced oxidation in vitro (Park et al., 2014). Orange peel polyphenols had also the ability to inhibit the activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in murine macrophage cell line (Chen et al., 2017). Ellagitannins, ellagic acid and its metabolites (urolithin A and urolithin B) isolated from black raspberry seeds, a major waste product after winemaking, showed anti-cancer activities against HT-29 colon cancer cells. Investigated compounds arrested the cell cycle and induced extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways (Cho et al., 2015). Pomegranate peel extract prevented bone loss in a mice model of osteoporosis and stimulated osteoblastic differentiation in vitro (Spilmont et al., 2015). Aromatic glycosides obtained from Prunus tomentosa seed waste inhibited α-glucosidase at the concentration level comparable to positive control acarbose and exhibited significant protective effect against H2O2-induced HepG2 cells damage (Liu et al., 2018). Catechins present in the grape seeds showed potential to inhibit angiotensin-I-converting enzyme in vitro (Deolindo et al., 2019), while anti-inflammatory effect of grape seed extract in LPS-induced RAW264.7 macrophages was attributed to flavonoids (Harbeoui et al., 2019). Also, pomegranate seed oil positively influenced fatty acids profile and reduced the activity of desaturases in rat’s liver (Białek et al., 2017). High biological potential of redundant fruit biomass can be utilized by pharmaceutical industry. However, processing of fruits waste for possible medicinal applications requires strict standardization of extracts or determination of purity of isolated compounds. What is more, before ingredients of fruits waste can be applied in a form of drugs, preliminary in vitro studies have to be confirmed not only in animal models, but also in clinical trials. Anyhow, standardized extracts or isolated active compounds incorporated into dietary supplements or functional cosmetics can also be a stream for fruits waste management. The re-utilization of food by-products is the easy way for sustainable production of active compounds and this idea gained recently a lot of interest. With the application of efficient extraction techniques fruits by-products can become a cheap source of active compounds.

Industrial Applications of Valuable Compounds Obtained From Fruits By-Products

Large amounts of wastes and by-products are produced at industrial levels, most of them containing highly valuable bioactive substances, which can be further used for different applications (Table 1). Hence, another scientific area is emerging within the large field of food science and technology – bio-residues valorization (Martins and Ferreira, 2017). Fruits waste can be used as such for some applications or for recovery of valuable compounds with therapeutic properties. Several applications of compounds recovered from different industries are well known. Compounds recovered from fruits wastes find further applications as additives in food products to preserve and enhance quality, to prevent food oxidation and to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms (Andrade et al., 2019). Also, added-value products obtained from fruits wastes can be used as novel packaging materials due to their oxygen-impermeable properties (Singh and Kaur, 2015) or as functional co-products (Nagel et al., 2014). Fruits wastes can be used in food industry as a substitute of wheat flour (Struck et al., 2018), can be added in cakes (Tumbas Šaponjac et al., 2016) or can be used in beverage industry (Reissner et al., 2019). The interest in natural-based products was expanded also in cosmetic industry, which is a profitable solution to valorize disposable by-products. Search for new drugs and increased resistance of the actual ones led to finding new sources of antimicrobial agents, such as recovered bioactive compounds from fruits waste (Ruiz-Montañez et al., 2014). In the last decades, the interest in using biomass for the production of energy has become an important strategy aimed to reduce the negative environmental impact of fossil fuels. In this context, value added products can be produced by fermentation of different wastes by anaerobic bacteria, which can be integrated into a fed-batch or continuous system for lipid or biofuel production (Liu et al., 2019). Due to rich composition in sucrose, inulin, maltose, glucose, fructose, starch, galactose, dextrose or lactose, fruits waste can be used as substrate for production of oligosaccharides or microbial polymers (Singh et al., 2019). Conventionally, polysaccharides are produced using sucrose as substrate, and enzymes such as β-fructofuranosidase and fructosyltransferase (de la Rosa et al., 2019). However, nowadays, more profitable processes involve fruits by-products and microorganisms such as Aspergillus versicolor (Dapper et al., 2016) or Aspergillus flavus (Ganaie et al., 2017). The agro industrial wastes which can be exploited for this purpose are those rich in sucrose: peels (agave mango, banana, pineapple, orange, etc.), leaves (banana, etc.), or pomaces (apple grape pomace) (Gnaneshwar Goud et al., 2013; Dapper et al., 2016). Fruits pomace can be also used to obtain pectin (used both in cosmetic and in food industry) (Barreira et al., 2019) or bioethanol, hydrogen or methane via anaerobic fermentation (Evcan and Tari, 2015). Most interesting applications of fruits waste are those which involve the cascade approaches of transforming recovered compounds into other different compounds. Compounds from fruits by-products (such as cellulose or hemicellulose) can be converted into sugars, further used for the production of biofuels and biochemicals or used for applications such as catalysis, chemical sensors and molecular separation (Banerjee et al., 2017).

Conclusion

Fruits by-products can be considered a rich source for the recovery and production of multiple co-products in an integrated biorefinery model where green methods can be combined in order to obtain added-value products. The method used for the recovery of active constituents and the selection of the appropriate solvent have a great influence on the extractability of the functional compounds, no unique extraction procedure being suitable for all samples and matrixes. Valuable compounds can be directly formulated as nutraceuticals for their proven health benefits or can be used as raw materials for other industries. The concept of recovery of different compounds from these wastes opens new routes for the development of “green” industries, which have a tremendous potential, especially where the availability of fruits waste is abundant. The emphasis on frontier sciences has already attracted interest in developing and optimizing new ecological methods for the efficient use of the biomass, for closing the chain by returning nutrients and organic matter to the soil, when all other useful products have been recovered.

Author Contributions

RF, IF, and ES contributed to data collection and analysis, manuscript design and preparation. AO and JX revised the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  27 in total

1.  Recovery of phenolic antioxidants from Syrah grape pomace through the optimization of an enzymatic extraction process.

Authors:  María-Rocío Meini; Ignacio Cabezudo; Carlos E Boschetti; Diana Romanini
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 7.514

Review 2.  Bioactives from fruit processing wastes: Green approaches to valuable chemicals.

Authors:  Jhumur Banerjee; Ramkrishna Singh; R Vijayaraghavan; Douglas MacFarlane; Antonio F Patti; Amit Arora
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 7.514

3.  Avocado seeds (Persea americana Mill.) prevents indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice.

Authors:  Brena Ramos Athaydes; Gisele Maziero Alves; Arícia Leone Evangelista Monteiro de Assis; João Victor Dutra Gomes; Ricardo Pereira Rodrigues; Bianca Prandi Campagnaro; Breno Valentim Nogueira; Dâmaris Silveira; Ricardo Machado Kuster; Thiago Melo Costa Pereira; Rodrigo Rezende Kitagawa; Rita de Cássia Ribeiro Gonçalves
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.475

4.  Exploitation of apple pomace towards extraction of triterpenic acids, antioxidant potential, cytotoxic effects, and inhibition of clinically important enzymes.

Authors:  Shivraj Hariram Nile; Arti Nile; Junqiu Liu; Doo Hwan Kim; Guoyin Kai
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Bio-refinery of orange peels waste: a new concept based on integrated green and solvent free extraction processes using ultrasound and microwave techniques to obtain essential oil, polyphenols and pectin.

Authors:  Meryem Boukroufa; Chahrazed Boutekedjiret; Loïc Petigny; Njara Rakotomanomana; Farid Chemat
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.491

6.  Agrochemical characterisation of the solid by-products and residues from the winery and distillery industry.

Authors:  M A Bustamante; R Moral; C Paredes; A Pérez-Espinosa; J Moreno-Caselles; M D Pérez-Murcia
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 7.145

7.  Composition and physicochemical properties of dried berry pomace.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Reißner; Said Al-Hamimi; Amparo Quiles; Carolin Schmidt; Susanne Struck; Isabel Hernando; Charlotta Turner; Harald Rohm
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.638

8.  Microwave and ultrasound pre-treatments to enhance anthocyanins extraction from different wine lees.

Authors:  R Romero-Díez; M Matos; L Rodrigues; Maria R Bronze; S Rodríguez-Rojo; M J Cocero; A A Matias
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 7.514

9.  Exploration of avocado by-products as natural sources of bioactive compounds.

Authors:  Maria Augusta Tremocoldi; Pedro Luiz Rosalen; Marcelo Franchin; Adna Prado Massarioli; Carina Denny; Érica Regina Daiuto; Jonas Augusto Rizzato Paschoal; Priscilla Siqueira Melo; Severino Matias de Alencar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pomegranate Peel Extract Prevents Bone Loss in a Preclinical Model of Osteoporosis and Stimulates Osteoblastic Differentiation in Vitro.

Authors:  Mélanie Spilmont; Laurent Léotoing; Marie-Jeanne Davicco; Patrice Lebecque; Elisabeth Miot-Noirault; Paul Pilet; Laurent Rios; Yohann Wittrant; Véronique Coxam
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.717

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Selected Aspects Related to Medicinal and Aromatic Plants as Alternative Sources of Bioactive Compounds.

Authors:  Radu Claudiu Fierascu; Irina Fierascu; Anda Maria Baroi; Alina Ortan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Biowaste as a Potential Source of Bioactive Compounds-A Case Study of Raspberry Fruit Pomace.

Authors:  Slađana Krivokapić; Milorad Vlaović; Biljana Damjanović Vratnica; Andrej Perović; Svetlana Perović
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 3.  By-Products Revalorization with Non-Thermal Treatments to Enhance Phytochemical Compounds of Fruit and Vegetables Derived Products: A Review.

Authors:  Marina Cano-Lamadrid; Francisco Artés-Hernández
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-27

4.  Bioactive Molecules of Mandarin Seed Oils Diminish Mycotoxin and the Existence of Fungi.

Authors:  Salman S Alharthi; Ahmed Noah Badr; Karolina Gromadzka; Kinga Stuper-Szablewska; Adel Gabr Abdel-Razek; Khaled Selim
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Phenolic-rich extracts from acerola, cashew apple and mango by-products cause diverse inhibitory effects and cell damages on enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M da Costa Lima; M Magnani; M Dos Santos Lima; C P de Sousa; J D Dubreuil; E L de Souza
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.813

6.  Subcritical Methanol Extraction of the Stone of Japanese Apricot Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.

Authors:  Tomoaki Kawabata; Yoshie Tanaka; Asako Horinishi; Megumi Mori; Asao Hosoda; Nami Yamamoto; Takahiko Mitani
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-07-15

7.  Nutritional and Bioactive Characterization of Sicana odorifera Naudim Vell. Seeds By-Products and Its Potential Hepatoprotective Properties in Swiss Albino Mice.

Authors:  Silvia Caballero; Laura Mereles; Alberto Burgos-Edwards; Nelson Alvarenga; Eva Coronel; Rocío Villalba; Olga Heinichen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.