| Literature DB >> 35008321 |
Henry J Thompson1, Elizabeth S Neil1, John N McGinley1, Vanessa K Fitzgerald1, Karam El Bayoumy2, Andrea Manni2.
Abstract
In vivo evidence of heterogeneous effects of n-3 fatty acids (N3FA) on cell signaling pathways associated with the reduced growth of breast cancer has been reported and is consistent with the expectation that N3FA will not exert uniform effects on all molecular subtypes of the disease. Similarly, available evidence indicates that many metabolites of N3FA are synthesized by mammalian cells and that they exert metabolite-specific biological activities. To begin to unravel the complex relationships among molecular subtypes and effects exerted by specific N3FA metabolites on those pathways, proof-of-concept experiments were conducted using cell lines representative of common molecular subtypes of human breast cancer. N3FA differed in anticancer activity with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) having greater anticancer activity than eicosapentaenoic acid. 4-oxo-docosahexaenoic (4-oxo-DHA), a penultimate metabolite of 5-lipoxygenase mediated DHA metabolism, induced dose-dependent inhibition of cell number accumulation with apoptosis as a primary effector mechanism. Interrogation of protein expression data using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) bioinformatics platform indicated that 4-oxo-DHA differentially impacted six canonical pathways and the cellular functions they regulate across common molecular subtypes of breast cancer. This included the endocannabinoid pathway for cancer inhibition that has not been previously reported. These findings provide a rationale for juxtaposing molecular subtype targeted treatment strategies with the adjuvant use of specific N3FA metabolites as an example of precision onco-nutrition (PON) for the management and control of breast cancer.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; cell signaling; docosahexaenoic acid; human cancer cell lines; molecular subtypes; n-3 fatty acids
Year: 2021 PMID: 35008321 PMCID: PMC8750666 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Dose- and time-dependent effects of n6- or n3-fatty acids on the growth of five subtype human breast cancer cells (BT474, MCF7, SKBR3, MDAMB231, and MDAMB468) graphed using the area under the curve (AUC) as a percent of the untreated control. (a) Linoleic acid (LA, n6); (b) Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, n3); (c) Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, n3).
Figure 2Metabolism of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and the dose- and time-dependent effects of 4-oxo-DHA on the growth of five subtype human breast cancer cells (BT474, MCF7, SKBR3, MDAMB231, and MDAMB468) graphed using an area under the curve (AUC) or the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) as a percent of untreated control. (a) Metabolism of DHA; (b) an area under the curve analysis; (c) the half-maximal inhibitory concentration for 3 days of treatment.
Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on Cell Proliferation and Apoptotic Cell Death.
| Cell Lines | BT474 | SKBR-3 | MDAMB468 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | + | - | - | |||
| PR | + | - | - | |||
| HER2 | + | + | - | |||
| 4-oxo-DHA (µM) | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Cell proliferation | ||||||
| Index (OD) | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.01 * | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 0.50 ± 0.01 * | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.01 * |
| RbSer780 ratio | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.01* | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.02 * | 3.21 ± 0.10 | 2.22 ± 0.07 * |
| Cyclin D1 | 2703 ± 66 | 2201 ± 42 * | 2666 ± 185 | 2643 ± 142 | 2494 ± 50 | 1895 ± 60 * |
| P21 | 24.0 ± 0.9 | 34.4 ± 2.9 * | 30.3 ± 3.6 | 45.4 ± 1.3 * | 49.9 ± 1.6 | 63.4 ± 2.9 * |
| P27 | 45.5 ± 2.2 | 84.3 ± 3.8 * | 17.1 ± 1.5 | 29.7 ± 1.8 * | 44.0 ± 2.5 | 52.9 ± 1.4 * |
| Apoptosis | ||||||
| Index (%) | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 25.1 ± 0.5 * | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 18.8 ± 0.5 * | 3.0 ± 0.1 | 14.6 ± 0.3 * |
| Apaf-1 | 190 ± 6 | 183 ± 4 | 255 ± 9 | 304 ± 15 * | 529 ± 7 | 521 ± 10 |
| Bax | 49.9 ± 1.8 | 32.5 ± 0.6 * | 92.8 ± 5.1 | 130 ± 7 * | 220 ± 15 | 248 ± 15 |
| Bcl-2 | 231 ± 12 | 99.5 ± 2.7 * | 47.8 ± 2.2 | 38.3 ± 3.7 * | 538 ± 14 | 367 ± 23 * |
| Bax/Bcl-2 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.01 * | 1.95 ± 0.06 | 3.62 ± 0.44 * | 0.41 ± 0.04 | 0.68 ± 0.02 * |
| PARP89 | 63.3 ± 4.6 | 28.9 ± 1.1 * | 51.6 ± 2.9 | 44.1 ± 6.5 | 84.0 ± 1.5 | 88.1 ± 2.4 |
| PARP116 | 1225 ± 16 | 407 ± 5 * | 1614 ± 40 | 1301 ± 132 | 1215 ± 25 | 973 ± 39 * |
| PARP89/116 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 * | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01* |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8); Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis rank test (* p < 0.05, 0 µM versus 25 µm 4-oxo-DHA).
Figure 3Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on Cell Proliferation and Apoptotic Cell Death. Levels of cell proliferation or apoptosis and associated target proteins in three human breast cancer cell lines (BT474, SKBR3, and MDAMB468); (a) Orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) shows a 3-class supervised model and partition the sources of variation; (b) To visualize the misclassification rate, the dendrogram depicts hierarchical clustering patterns among three different cell lines.
Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on Cell Transcription Factors.
| Cell Lines | BT474 | SKBR3 | MDAMB468 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | + | - | - | |||
| PR | + | - | - | |||
| HER2 | + | + | - | |||
| 4-oxo-DHA (µM) | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| PPARβ | 153 ± 3 | 86 ± 2 * | 130 ± 5 | 110 ± 2 * | 198 ± 10 | 215 ± 8 |
| PPARγ | 45 ± 1 | 57 ± 1 * | 94 ± 2 | 124 ± 3 * | 126 ± 1 | 153 ± 2 * |
| GPR120 | 13.1 ± 0.3 | 22.6 ± 0.8 * | 25.3 ± 1.1 | 25.5 ± 1.5 | 31.6 ± 1.1 | 41.8 ± 3.6 * |
| Hif-1α | 179 ± 8 | 96 ± 4 * | 398 ± 20 | 434 ± 48 | 468 ± 30 | 319 ± 35 * |
| SIRT-1 | 663 ± 18 | 304 ± 5 * | 1228 ± 85 | 1266 ± 72 | 1021 ± 41 | 927 ± 34 |
| GADD153 | 87 ± 3 | 43 ± 2 * | 209 ± 23 | 274 ± 407 | 432 ± 28 | 338 ± 10 * |
| Ratios | ||||||
| NF-κB p65Ser536 | 0.65 ± 0.04 | 0.45 ± 0.03 * | 0.45 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 2.38 ± 0.12 | 1.28 ± 0.08 * |
| FOXO3aThr32 | 3.32 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.19 * | 1.92 ± 0.18 | 0.80 ± 0.11 * | 5.97 ± 0.06 | 5.25 ± 0.09 * |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8); Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis rank test (* p < 0.05, 0 µM versus 25 µm 4-oxo-DHA).
Figure 4Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on Cell Transcription Factors. Levels of cell proliferation or apoptosis and associated target proteins in three human breast cancer cell lines (BT474, SKBR3, and MDAMB468); (a) orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) shows a 3-class supervised model and partition the sources of variation; (b) to visualize the misclassification rate, the dendrogram depicts hierarchical clustering patterns among three different cell lines.
Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on Growth Factor Signaling.
| Cell Lines | BT474 | SKBR3 | MDAMB468 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | + | - | - | |||
| PR | + | - | - | |||
| HER2 | + | + | - | |||
| 4-oxo-DHA (µM) | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| IGF-1R | 80 ± 5 | 38 ± 2 * | 61 ± 4 | 50 ± 1 * | 296 ± 3 | 236 ± 2 * |
| PI3Kp110 | 174 ± 5 | 129 ± 3 * | 294 ± 16 | 228 ± 16 * | 192 ± 1 | 158 ± 3 * |
| Ratios | ||||||
| IRS1Ser636/639 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.01 * | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 0.79 ± 0.06 | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.02 |
| AMPKThr172 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 * | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 * | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 * |
| AktSer473 | 3.29 ± 0.13 | 0.78 ± 0.03 * | 3.23 ± 0.23 | 1.01 ± 0.08 * | 7.68 ± 0.29 | 6.50 ± 0.26 * |
| mTORSer2448 | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.01 * | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.01 * |
| RaptorSer792 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 * | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 * |
| PRAS40Thr246 | 2.79 ± 0.08 | 1.80 ± 0.07 * | 1.43 ± 0.06 | 1.26 ± 0.03 | 2.47 ± 0.06 | 2.05 ± 0.01 * |
| P70S6KThr389 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 * | 0.55 ± 0.17 | 0.10 ± 0.01 * | 0.93 ± 0.03 | 0.67 ± 0.03 * |
| 4E-BP1Thr37/46 | 1.30 ± 0.09 | 0.88 ± 0.03 * | 1.62 ± 0.27 | 1.39 ± 0.16 | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.65 ± 0.02 * |
Values are means ± SEM (n = 8); Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis rank test (* p < 0.05, 0 µM versus 25 µm 4-oxo-DHA).
Figure 5Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on Growth Factor Signaling. Levels of cell proliferation or apoptosis and associated target proteins in three human breast cancer cell lines (BT474, SKBR3, and MDAMB468); (a) Orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) shows a 3-class supervised model and partition the sources of variation; (b) To visualize the misclassification rate, the dendrogram depicts hierarchical clustering patterns among three different cell lines.
Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on Lipid Metabolism.
| Cell Lines | BT474 | SKBR-3 | MDAMB-468 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | + | - | - | |||
| PR | + | - | - | |||
| HER2 | + | + | - | |||
| 4-oxo-DHA (µM) | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| FASN | 787 ± 22 | 552 ± 3 * | 2081 ± 86 | 2150 ± 34 | 1141 ± 82 | 1132 ± 74 |
| HMGCR | 469 ± 8 | 396 ± 9 * | 275 ± 22 | 309 ± 33 | 566 ± 20 | 432 ± 42 * |
| SREBP-1 | 297 ± 11 | 123 ± 3 * | 568 ± 25 | 399 ± 8 * | 575 ± 17 | 520 ± 28 |
| ACCSer79 ratio | 0.36 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.08 * | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 1.13 ± 0.35 * | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 1.07 ± 0.04 * |
Values are mean ± SEM (n = 8); Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis rank test (* p < 0.05, 0 µM versus 25 µm 4-oxo-DHA).
Figure 6Canonical pathways affected by 4-oxo-DHA as predicted by the phosphoproteome data sets listed in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. Canonical pathways shown for cell line (a) BT474, (b) MDAMB468, and (c) SKBR3. The −log(B-H p-values) is the multi = comparison-adjusted probability that the association between the protein expression set and the canonical pathway is due to chance. The direction of the differences in expression between the treatment and the control for each protein component was compared to that tabulated in the IPA knowledge basis (>80,000 database entries) that support the canonical pathways that have been annotated and a z-score was computed. A z-score ≤ −2 indicates the pathway is inhibited and ≥2 that the pathway is activated. If the z-score is between −2 and 2, no prediction of inhibition or activation is deduced. Shades of red indicate that the pathway was activated by treatment with 4-oxo-DHA; greater color intensity indicates stronger evidence of activation. Shades of blue indicate that the pathway was inhibited by treatment with 4-oxo-DHA; greater color intensity indicates stronger evidence of inhibition. The absence of coloration indicates that the evidence was not strong enough to permit a prediction of pathway status.
Figure 7Canonical pathways affected by 4-oxo-DHA across three molecular subtypes of breast cancer cell lines. Canonical pathways affected by 4-oxo-DHA as predicted by the nonphosphorylated proteome data sets listed in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. Canonical pathways shown for cell line (a) BT474, (b) MDAMB468, and (c) SKBR3.The −log(B-H p-values) is the multicomparison adjusted probability that the association between the protein expression set and the canonical pathway is due to chance. The direction of the differences in expression between the treatment and the control for each protein component was compared to that tabulated in the IPA knowledge basis (>80,000 database entries) that support the canonical pathways that have been annotated and a z-score was computed. A z-score ≤ −2 indicates the pathway is inhibited and ≥2 that the pathway is activated. If the z-score is between −2 and 2, no prediction of inhibition or activation is deduced. Shades of red indicate that the pathway was activated by treatment with 4-oxo-DHA; greater color intensity indicates stronger evidence of activation. Shades of blue indicate that the pathway was inhibited by treatment with 4-oxo-DHA; greater color intensity indicates stronger evidence of inhibition. The absence of coloration indicates that the evidence was not strong enough to permit a prediction of pathway status.
Figure 8Regulation of diseases and cell functions by 4-oxo-DHA was observed across three molecular subtypes of breast cancer cell lines. The Core Analysis algorithm in IPA also identifies diseases and functions within cells that are consistent with the protein expression data. Those data are shown in heat maps based on the expression of (a) phosphorylated and (b) non-phosphorylated proteins. Shades of red indicate that the biological function was activated by treatment with 4-oxo-DHA; greater color intensity indicates stronger evidence of activation. Shades of blue indicate that the biological function was inhibited by treatment with 4-oxo-DHA; greater color intensity indicates stronger evidence of inhibition. The absence of coloration indicates that the evidence was not strong enough to permit a prediction of biological function status.
Figure 9Effect of 4-oxo-DHA on the mTOR signaling pathway was diagrammed in IPA and corresponding expression data from the BT474 cell line was overlaid on the pathway. Overlaid expression is shown as the ratio of phosphorylated to total protein. The chart on the right shows the expression of major regulatory nodes of the mTOR signaling pathway while illustrating a pattern of differential regulation across the cell lines BT474, SRBR3, and MDAMB464, respectively. Red indicates protein activation and blue indicates inhibition.
IPA Analysis match for the 4-oxo DHA-induced expression profile in MDAMB468.
| Target Gene 1 | Treatment 2 | Z-Score 3 | Accession ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| mTOR | AZD8055 | 23.88 | GSE70138 |
| multiple targets | Celastrol | 16.15 | GSE70138 |
| CDK1; 2 | CGP60474 | 15.67 | GSE70138 |
| CDK | AT7519 | 14.17 | GSE70138 |
| CDK | AZD5438 | 13.36 | GSE70138 |
| CDK9 | Alvocidib | 14.17 | GSE70138 |
| JNKs | CC401 | 15.67 | GSE70138 |
| MEK | AZD8330 | 14.94 | GSE70138 |
| IKKbeta; alpha 2 | BMS345541 | 14.17 | GSE70138 |
1 mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; CDK1, cyclin dependent kinase 1; CDK2, cyclin dependent kinase-2; JNK, jun N terminal kinase; MEK, mitogen activated protein kinase kinase; IKKbeta or IKKalpha, inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit. 2 Treatments: by chemical names andPubChem CID: AZD8055, [5-[2,4-bis[(3S)-3-methylmorpholin-4-yl]pyrido [2,3-d]pyrimidin-7-yl]-2-methoxyphenyl]methanol, Compound CID: 25262965; Celastrol; Tripterin(e) (2R,4aS,6aR,6aS,14aS,14bR)-10-hydroxy-2,4a,6a,6a,9,14a-hexamethyl-11-oxo-1,3,4,5,6,13,14,14b-octahydropicene-2-carboxylic acid, Compound CID: 122724; CGP60474,-[[4-[2-(3-chloroanilino)pyrimidin-4-yl]pyridin-2-yl] amino]propan-1-ol, Compound CID: 644215; AT7519,4-[(2,6-dichlorobenzoyl)amino]-N-piperidin-4-yl-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide, Compound CID: 11338033; AZD5438,4-(2-methyl-3-propan-2-ylimidazol-4-yl)-N-(4-methylsulfonylphenyl)pyrimidin-2-amine, Compound CID: 16747683; Alvocidib; Flavopiridol, 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-8-[(3S,4R)-3-hydroxy-1-methylpiperidin-4-yl]chromen-4-one, Compound CID: 5287969; CC4013-[3-(2-piperidin-1-ylethoxy)phenyl]-5-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)-1H-indazole, Compound CID: 10430360; AZD8330,2-(2-fluoro-4-iodoanilino)-N-(2-hydroxyethoxy)-1,5-dimethyl-6-oxopyridine-3-carboxamide, Compound CID: 16666708; BMS345541, N′-(1,8-dimethylimidazo[1,2-a]quinoxalin-4-yl)ethane-1,2-diamine, Compound CID: 9813758. 3 Z-score. IPA computed a z-score for the match of the “query” signature against the signatures of all other analyses. The larger the z-score the stronger the match.
Figure 10Schematic of the metabolism of DHA.