An adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is licensed for the prevention of herpes zoster. This paper reviews its safety and reactogenicity. A pooled analysis of two pivotal randomized Phase-3 trials (NCT01165177, NCT01165229) in adults ⩾50 years found that more solicited adverse events (AEs) were reported with RZV than placebo. Injection site pain was the most common solicited AE (RZV: 78.0% participants; placebo: 10.9%). Grade-3 pain occurred in 6.4% of RZV and 0.3% of placebo recipients. Myalgia, fatigue, and headache were the most commonly reported general solicited AEs (RZV: 44.7%, 44.5%, and 37.7%, respectively; placebo: 11.7%, 16.5%, and 15.5%, respectively). Most symptoms were mild to moderate in intensity with a median duration of 2-3 days. The intensity of reactogenicity symptoms did not differ substantially after the first and second vaccine doses. The pooled analysis of the pivotal Phase-3 trials did not identify any clinically relevant differences in the overall incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), fatal AEs or potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) between RZV and placebo. Reactogenicity in five studies of immunocompromised patients ⩾18 years (autologous stem cell transplant, human immunodeficiency virus, solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and renal transplant; NCT01610414, NCT01165203, NCT01798056, NCT01767467, and NCT02058589) was consistent with that observed in the pivotal Phase-3 trials. There were no clinically relevant differences between RZV and placebo in the immunocompromised populations with regard to overall incidence of SAEs, fatal AEs, pIMDs, or AEs related to patients' underlying condition. Post-marketing surveillance found that the most commonly reported AEs were consistent with the reactogenicity profile of the vaccine in clinical trials. Overall, the clinical safety data for RZV are reassuring.
An adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is licensed for the prevention of herpes zoster. This paper reviews its safety and reactogenicity. A pooled analysis of two pivotal randomized Phase-3 trials (NCT01165177, NCT01165229) in adults ⩾50 years found that more solicited adverse events (AEs) were reported with RZV than placebo. Injection site pain was the most common solicited AE (RZV: 78.0% participants; placebo: 10.9%). Grade-3 pain occurred in 6.4% of RZV and 0.3% of placebo recipients. Myalgia, fatigue, and headache were the most commonly reported general solicited AEs (RZV: 44.7%, 44.5%, and 37.7%, respectively; placebo: 11.7%, 16.5%, and 15.5%, respectively). Most symptoms were mild to moderate in intensity with a median duration of 2-3 days. The intensity of reactogenicity symptoms did not differ substantially after the first and second vaccine doses. The pooled analysis of the pivotal Phase-3 trials did not identify any clinically relevant differences in the overall incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), fatal AEs or potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) between RZV and placebo. Reactogenicity in five studies of immunocompromised patients ⩾18 years (autologous stem cell transplant, human immunodeficiency virus, solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and renal transplant; NCT01610414, NCT01165203, NCT01798056, NCT01767467, and NCT02058589) was consistent with that observed in the pivotal Phase-3 trials. There were no clinically relevant differences between RZV and placebo in the immunocompromised populations with regard to overall incidence of SAEs, fatal AEs, pIMDs, or AEs related to patients' underlying condition. Post-marketing surveillance found that the most commonly reported AEs were consistent with the reactogenicity profile of the vaccine in clinical trials. Overall, the clinical safety data for RZV are reassuring.
After primary infection with Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV) which
manifests as chickenpox, the virus becomes latent in the cranial, dorsal root, and
autonomic nerve ganglia.
Typically, years after the primary infection, reactivation of the latent
virus occurs and presents as herpes zoster (HZ) which usually manifests as a painful
blistering dermatomal rash.
HZ is common, with approximately 1 million cases occurring annually in the
United States (US).
Its incidence rises with age, increasing from five cases per 1,000 persons
per year in individuals 50–59 years of age to 11 cases per 1,000 persons per year in
individuals ⩾80 years of age.
Lifetime risk for HZ in the US is one in three, increasing to one in two for
persons ⩾85 years of age.
The risk of HZ is also higher in populations who are immunocompromised due to
underlying disease or immunosuppressive therapy.[3,5,6]The most common complication of HZ is refractory, long-term neuropathic pain known as
post-herpetic neuralgia, commonly defined as persistent pain for at least 90 days
following the resolution of the HZ rash.
Post herpetic neuralgia has been shown to occur in 5%, 10−17% and 20% of HZ
cases in persons <60, 60−79, and ⩾80 years of age, respectively.
Other complications of HZ include secondary bacterial infection, ocular
involvement with uveitis, neurological complications including encephalitis,
vasculopathy leading to stroke or myocardial infarction, and disseminated infections.An adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV; Shingrix, GSK) is licensed for the
prevention of HZ in many countries worldwide for adults ⩾50 years of age. In the US,
it is also approved for adults aged 18 years and older who are or will be at
increased risk of HZ due to immunodeficiency or immunosuppression caused by known
disease or therapy. In addition, in the European Union, the vaccine is also licensed
for the prevention of post-herpetic neuralgia and for use in adults ⩾18 years of age
who are at increased risk of HZ. RZV consists of a recombinant subunit VZV
glycoprotein E antigen and AS01B. It is administered intramuscularly as a
two-dose series with the second dose administered 2−6 months after the first (the
timing of the second dose varies by indication and the recommendations of regulatory
authorities). Two pivotal Phase-3 trials have shown that RZV reduces the risk of
developing HZ by over 90% in immunocompetent adults ⩾50 years of age.[10,11] In addition,
the efficacy and/or immunogenicity and safety of RZV have been evaluated in adults
⩾18 years of age with varying immunocompromising conditions or receiving
immunosuppressive therapies.[12-19] Although the vaccine
demonstrates transient local and systemic reactogenicity, it has a favorable
benefit–risk profile in the age and risk groups studied.[10-19] Nevertheless, continued
monitoring of safety data following introduction of the vaccine is important to
detect any new safety signals and potential shift in the risk–benefit ratio.In this paper, we summarize the safety and reactogenicity data of RZV in
immunocompetent adults ⩾50 years of age, as well as in immunocompromised adults ⩾18
years of age. We have focused on the marketed dose and formulation of RZV; although
some studies of different dosing regimens and formulations have been done, they are
not discussed in the present paper. In addition, published post-marketing
surveillance conducted since first launch is summarized.
Pooled analysis of two pivotal Phase-3 trials in older adults
The two pivotal Phase-3 trials of RZV (ZOE-50, NCT01165177;
ZOE-70, NCT01165229) were conducted in 18 countries in Europe, North America, South
America, Asia, and Australia.[10,11] Adults ⩾50 years of age
(ZOE-50, N = 15,411) or ⩾70 years of age (ZOE-70, N = 13,900) were randomized 1:1 to
receive either RZV or placebo in a two-dose series given 2 months apart. In both
studies, solicited local and general adverse events (AEs) were recorded by a
sub-cohort of study participants on diary cards for 7 days after each vaccination.
All local AEs were considered related to vaccination. Events were graded on a scale
from 1 (mild; not interfering with everyday activities) to 3 (severe; significant at
rest and prevent normal, everyday activities) (Supplemental Table S1). In addition, all study participants recorded
unsolicited AEs (comprising both non-serious AEs and serious AEs [SAEs]) for 30 days
after each vaccination; data on non-serious unsolicited AEs are not reviewed in this
paper. SAEs were recorded for 1 year after vaccination, while fatal AEs, SAEs
considered related to study vaccines and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs)
were recorded for the entire study duration. pIMDs were pre-defined in the protocol
and included autoimmune diseases and other inflammatory or neurological disorders
that might or might not have an autoimmune etiology. Specific information on pIMDs
was collected because of the theoretical concern that the adjuvant component of the
vaccine might precipitate the development of autoimmune syndromes.A pooled analysis of safety from ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 has been reported previously and
is summarized here.[21,22] The analysis included 14,645 RZV recipients and 14,660 placebo
recipients, with a median follow-up of 4.4 years. Most participants were White, 58%
were female and the mean age was 68.6 years.
Solicited AEs (reactogenicity)
For the RZV group, the reactogenicity sub-cohort consisted of
4886 participants in the RZV group and 4881 participants in the placebo group.
More solicited AEs were reported with RZV than placebo. However, most
symptoms were of mild to moderate intensity, with a median duration of 2−3 days.
Pain at the injection site was the most common solicited AE, reported by 78.0%
of participants in the RZV group and 10.9% of those receiving placebo (Figure 1).
Grade-3 pain (i.e. prevented normal, everyday activity) occurred in 6.4%
of RZV and 0.3% of placebo recipients. Redness and swelling were also reported
by more participants receiving RZV compared with placebo, although the incidence
of Grade-3 redness and swelling was low in both study groups (Figure 1).
Myalgia, fatigue and headache were the most commonly reported general
solicited AEs, occurring respectively in 44.7%, 44.5%, and 37.7% of RZV
recipients and 11.7%, 16.5%, and 15.5% of placebo recipients (Figure 1).
Grade-3 myalgia, fatigue and headache were uncommon but occurred in more
RZV recipients than with placebo (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Percentage of participants reporting solicited local and general AEs
during the 7-day post-vaccination period in the combined analysis of the
two pivotal phase-3 trials (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70)[21,22] and studies of
immunocompromised populations.
*[12–14,16–19]
*Each population was evaluated in a different study. Pivotal phase-3
trials: data from the pooled safety analysis of the ZOE-50 and ZOE-70
trials in adults ⩾50 years of age. For the pivotal phase-3 ZOE trials, N
corresponds to a sub-cohort of participants who were asked to complete a
7-day diary card recording solicited AEs and who received ⩾1 vaccine
dose. This sub-cohort consisted of 4886 participants in the RZV group
and 4881 participants in the placebo group; 4884 participants in the RZV
group and 4880 participants in the placebo group returned their diary
cards reporting local events, while 4876 participants in the RZV group
and 4881 participants in the placebo group returned their diary cards
reporting general events. For the studies in immunocompromised
populations, all participants in the TVC were asked to complete a diary
card; the N values shown correspond to the number who returned a diary
card and received ⩾1 vaccine dose. AEs were recorded for 7 days (on the
day of vaccination and 6 days thereafter). Grade-3 pain and general
solicited AEs: prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade-3 redness
and swelling: >100 mm. Fever: temperature ⩾37.5°C. Grade-3 fever:
temperature >39.0°C.
Percentage of participants reporting solicited local and general AEs
during the 7-day post-vaccination period in the combined analysis of the
two pivotal phase-3 trials (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70)[21,22] and studies of
immunocompromised populations.*[12-14,16-19]*Each population was evaluated in a different study. Pivotal phase-3
trials: data from the pooled safety analysis of the ZOE-50 and ZOE-70
trials in adults ⩾50 years of age. For the pivotal phase-3 ZOE trials, N
corresponds to a sub-cohort of participants who were asked to complete a
7-day diary card recording solicited AEs and who received ⩾1 vaccine
dose. This sub-cohort consisted of 4886 participants in the RZV group
and 4881 participants in the placebo group; 4884 participants in the RZV
group and 4880 participants in the placebo group returned their diary
cards reporting local events, while 4876 participants in the RZV group
and 4881 participants in the placebo group returned their diary cards
reporting general events. For the studies in immunocompromised
populations, all participants in the TVC were asked to complete a diary
card; the N values shown correspond to the number who returned a diary
card and received ⩾1 vaccine dose. AEs were recorded for 7 days (on the
day of vaccination and 6 days thereafter). Grade-3 pain and general
solicited AEs: prevented normal, everyday activities. Grade-3 redness
and swelling: >100 mm. Fever: temperature ⩾37.5°C. Grade-3 fever:
temperature >39.0°C.AE, adverse event; GI, gastrointestinal; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell
transplant; RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine; TVC, total vaccinated
cohort.A post hoc analysis showed that the incidence of local and
general solicited AEs (all grades and Grade 3) was higher in women than in men
(Table 1).
Local AEs (all grades and Grade 3) and Grade-3 general AEs were higher in
participants 50−69 years of age than in those ⩾70 years of age. When analyzed
according to race and ethnicity, there was a trend toward higher reactogenicity
in the RZV group among participants of Asian heritage and those not of
American–Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (Table 1).
However, the ZOE studies were not powered to evaluate differences between
population subgroups and the numbers were very small in some subgroups; the data
should therefore be interpreted with caution. Reactogenicity might be higher in
women than men because of anatomical differences in skin thickness, blood flow,
and nervous system structure.
Furthermore, immune responses and cytokine levels are affected by sex
hormones, with androgens and high doses of oestrogens shown to be immunosuppressive.
The lower incidence of solicited AEs in older study participants is
unsurprising, as it has been previously observed that reporting rates reduce
during adult life, possibly as a result of higher tolerance to pain and symptoms
of illness gained with age and/or the waning of innate immune defense mechanisms.
Older people exhibit lower systemic levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10,
and C-reactive protein after vaccination, which might explain the trend of
reporting fewer systemic AEs, in particular fever.
Table 1.
Reactogenicity (solicited AEs) reported during the 7-day post-vaccination
period according to gender, race, and ethnicity in the combined analysis
of the two pivotal Phase-3 trials (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70, reactogenicity sub-cohort).
.
Local AEs
General AEs
RZV, n (%)
Placebo, n (%)
RZV, n (%)
Placebo, n (%)
Age
50−69 years
2,287 (87.1)
354 (13.5)
1,907 (72.7)
866 (33.1)
Grade 3
297 (11.3)
13 (0.5)
375 (14.3)
74 (2.8)
⩾70 years
1,657 (73.4)
218 (9.6)
1,252 (55.6)
553 (24.4)
Grade 3
162 (7.2)
4 (0.2)
153 (6.8)
42 (1.9)
Gender
Male
1,465 (75.5)
201 (9.9)
1,126 (58.1)
483 (23.8)
Grade 3
137 (7.1)
5 (0.2)
127 (6.6)
37 (1.8)
Female
2,479 (84.2)
371 (13.0)
2,033 (69.2)
936 (32.8)
Grade 3
322 (10.9)
12 (0.4)
401 (13.6)
79 (2.8)
Race
African/African–American
52 (72.2)
9 (13.8)
44 (61.1)
22 (33.8)
Grade 3
7 (9.7)
0
5 (6.9)
1 (1.5)
Asian
785 (84.6)
142 (15.3)
666 (71.8)
263 (28.3)
Grade 3
99 (10.7)
3 (0.3)
89 (9.6)
15 (1.6)
White
2,861 (79.8)
360 (10.0)
2,255 (63.0)
1,054 (29.4)
Grade 3
304 (8.5)
9 (0.3)
373 (10.4)
87 (2.4)
Other
246 (82.0)
61 (20.3)
194 (65.1)
80 (26.7)
Grade 3
49 (16.3)
5 (1.7)
61 (20.5)
13 (4.3)
Ethnicity
American–Hispanic or Latino
376 (76.4)
85 (17.3)
295 (60.2)
121 (24.6)
Grade 3
71 (14.4)
5 (1.0)
79 (16.1)
17 (3.5)
Other
3,568 (81.2)
487 (11.1)
2,864 (65.3)
1,298 (29.6)
Grade 3
388 (8.8)
12 (0.3)
449 (10.2)
99 (2.3)
AE, adverse event; n (%), number and percentage of
patients experiencing an AE; RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.
The reactogenicity sub-cohort comprised participants who completed a
diary card recording AEs after vaccination (during the 7-day
post-vaccination period). Grade-3 pain and general solicited AEs:
prevented normal, everyday activities; grade-3 redness and swelling:
>100 mm.
Reactogenicity (solicited AEs) reported during the 7-day post-vaccination
period according to gender, race, and ethnicity in the combined analysis
of the two pivotal Phase-3 trials (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70, reactogenicity sub-cohort).
.AE, adverse event; n (%), number and percentage of
patients experiencing an AE; RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.The reactogenicity sub-cohort comprised participants who completed a
diary card recording AEs after vaccination (during the 7-day
post-vaccination period). Grade-3 pain and general solicited AEs:
prevented normal, everyday activities; grade-3 redness and swelling:
>100 mm.The intensity of solicited AEs in the RZV group after the second vaccine dose in
relation to the first dose was explored in a post hoc analysis.
Local AEs were evaluated in 4676 vaccinees. A total of 244 (5.2%)
individuals reported a Grade-3 local AE after the first dose, of whom 165
(67.6%) experienced the same event at a lower intensity (grade ⩽ 2) after the
second dose (Figure 2).
A total of 1235 (26.4%) vaccinees reported no local AE after the first dose; of
these 1235 individuals, 71.3% again reported no local AE following the second
dose (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Intensity (grade) of solicited local and general AEs reported after the
second RZV dose in relation to the first dose (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70).
Data are reported for the reactogenicity sub-cohort which comprised
participants who completed a diary card recording AEs after vaccination.
AEs were recorded for 7 days (on the day of vaccination and 6 days
thereafter). N: number of RZV vaccinees with both doses administered and
corresponding event intensity after Dose 1 and/or after Dose 2. n%:
number and percentage of RZV vaccinees with events at a specific grade.
There were nine events (four injection site and five general events)
with missing grading after Dose 1 and 6 events (three injection site and
three general events) with missing grading after Dose 2. Injection site
events included: pain at the injection site, redness at the injection
site, and swelling at the injection site. General events included:
fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and/or
abdominal pain), headache, myalgia, shiver, and fever.
Intensity (grade) of solicited local and general AEs reported after the
second RZV dose in relation to the first dose (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70).Data are reported for the reactogenicity sub-cohort which comprised
participants who completed a diary card recording AEs after vaccination.
AEs were recorded for 7 days (on the day of vaccination and 6 days
thereafter). N: number of RZV vaccinees with both doses administered and
corresponding event intensity after Dose 1 and/or after Dose 2. n%:
number and percentage of RZV vaccinees with events at a specific grade.
There were nine events (four injection site and five general events)
with missing grading after Dose 1 and 6 events (three injection site and
three general events) with missing grading after Dose 2. Injection site
events included: pain at the injection site, redness at the injection
site, and swelling at the injection site. General events included:
fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and/or
abdominal pain), headache, myalgia, shiver, and fever.AE, adverse event; RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.In the corresponding analysis of general solicited AEs in 4668 vaccinees, 222
(4.8%) reported a Grade-3 general AE after the first dose; of these
participants, 141 (63.5%) experienced the same event at lower intensity
(grade ⩽ 2) following the second dose (Figure 2).
A total of 2312 (49.5%) vaccinees experienced no general AE after the
first dose, of whom 1617 (69.9%) also experienced no event after the second dose
(Figure 2). A
similar pattern was seen when each specific local and general solicited AE was
analyzed individually.
SAEs, fatal AEs and pIMDs
SAEs were reported by 1482 (10.1%) participants receiving RZV
and 1525 (10.4%) receiving placebo within 1 year after the last vaccine dose
(Figure
3(a)).[21,22] The relative risk (RR) of a SAE for RZV
versus placebo was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI)
0.91−1.05; p = 0.46).[21,22]
Figure 3.
Percentage of participants reporting SAEs, fatal AEs and pIMDs in the
combined analysis of the two pivotal Phase-3 trials (ZOE-50 and
ZOE-70)[21,22] and studies of immunocompromised
populations:[12–14,16–19] (a)
SAEsa, (b) fatal AEs,a and (c)
pIMDsa.
Pivotal Phase-3 trials: data from the pooled safety analysis of the
ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 trials in adults ⩾50 years of age. Data are reported
for the total vaccinated cohort which comprised participants who
received at least one vaccine dose. SAEs and pIMDs were recorded over
the following study periods: ZOE and HSCT: from first vaccination up to
1 year after last vaccination; other studies: from first vaccination
until study end (approximately 12 months after the last scheduled dose).
Fatal AEs were recorded from first vaccination until study end
(approximately 12 months after the last scheduled dose for all studies
except HSCT and ZOE; the median duration of the safety follow-up was 29
months for the HSCT trial and 4.4 years for the pooled safety analysis
of the ZOE trials). Error bars represent 95% CIs.
AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; N, number of patients in the
total vaccinated cohort per group; pIMD, potential immune-mediated
disease; RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine; SAE, serious adverse event;
TVC, total vaccinated cohort.
aEach population was evaluated in a different study.
Percentage of participants reporting SAEs, fatal AEs and pIMDs in the
combined analysis of the two pivotal Phase-3 trials (ZOE-50 and
ZOE-70)[21,22] and studies of immunocompromised
populations:[12-14,16-19] (a)
SAEsa, (b) fatal AEs,a and (c)
pIMDsa.Pivotal Phase-3 trials: data from the pooled safety analysis of the
ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 trials in adults ⩾50 years of age. Data are reported
for the total vaccinated cohort which comprised participants who
received at least one vaccine dose. SAEs and pIMDs were recorded over
the following study periods: ZOE and HSCT: from first vaccination up to
1 year after last vaccination; other studies: from first vaccination
until study end (approximately 12 months after the last scheduled dose).
Fatal AEs were recorded from first vaccination until study end
(approximately 12 months after the last scheduled dose for all studies
except HSCT and ZOE; the median duration of the safety follow-up was 29
months for the HSCT trial and 4.4 years for the pooled safety analysis
of the ZOE trials). Error bars represent 95% CIs.AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; N, number of patients in the
total vaccinated cohort per group; pIMD, potential immune-mediated
disease; RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine; SAE, serious adverse event;
TVC, total vaccinated cohort.aEach population was evaluated in a different study.The nature of the events was as expected in a study population of this age (⩾50
years), and the most frequently reported SAEs reported within 1 year
post-vaccination were pneumonia (0.57% RZV and 0.45% placebo) and atrial
fibrillation (0.38% RZV and 0.40% placebo).[21,22] There were no significant
differences between RZV and placebo in RR for the 10 most common SAEs with an
incidence ⩾0.2% in the RZV group (Figure 4).
Only one SAE, supraventricular tachycardia, was reported significantly
more often in RZV vaccinees than placebo vaccinees (six participants versus
none; p = 0.03).[21,22] To explore this further,
a follow-up analysis was conducted of a group of SAEs that are pathologically
related to supraventricular tachycardia (arrhythmia supraventricular, atrial
fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, cardiac flutter,
supraventricular tachycardia, tachyarrhythmia, and tachycardia paroxysmal). The
analysis found no significant difference between RZV and placebo (incidence
0.47% with RZV and 0.45% with placebo; RR 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7, 1.5);
p = 0.86).
Three SAEs were reported significantly more frequently with placebo
versus RZV: aortic stenosis, cardiorespiratory arrest, and
retinal detachment.
Figure 4.
Relative risk versus placebo of SAEs (10 most frequently
reported with incidence ⩾0.2% in the RZV group) occurring within 1 year
of last vaccination in the combined analysis of the two pivotal Phase-3
trials (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70).
Data are reported for the total vaccinated cohort which comprised
participants who received at least one vaccine dose.
Relative risk versus placebo of SAEs (10 most frequently
reported with incidence ⩾0.2% in the RZV group) occurring within 1 year
of last vaccination in the combined analysis of the two pivotal Phase-3
trials (ZOE-50 and ZOE-70).Data are reported for the total vaccinated cohort which comprised
participants who received at least one vaccine dose.CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk; RZV, recombinant zoster
vaccine; SAE, serious adverse event.A descriptive analysis did not identify any difference between RZV and placebo in
the incidence of SAEs within 1 year after the last vaccine dose in different
racial subgroups: 10.3% RZV versus 10.6% placebo for White
participants; 10.5% RZV versus 13.3% placebo for
African/African–American participants; 10.4% for RZV versus
10.7% placebo for Asian participants; and 7.0% RZV versus 6.9%
placebo for participants of other racial subgroups.
SAEs were experienced more frequently in men (11.9% RZV
versus 12.5% placebo) than in women (8.8% RZV
versus 8.9% placebo) and in participants ⩾70 years of age
(12.7% RZV versus 13.3% placebo) than in those 50−69 years of
age (6.2% RZV versus 6.1% placebo).During the entire study period (median follow-up 4.4 years), SAEs considered by
investigators to be related to vaccination occurred in 15 participants (0.1%) in
both the RZV and placebo groups; only two events occurred in more than one
participant (rheumatoid arthritis in two participants and syncope in two
participants, all of whom had received placebo).Fatal AEs occurred in 634 (4.4%) participants in the RZV group and 680 (4.6%)
participants in the placebo group during the entire study period (Figure 3(b)). The most
frequently reported fatal AEs were cardiac failure (0.3% RZV
versus 0.4% placebo), pneumonia (0.3% RZV
versus 0.3% placebo), myocardial infarction (0.3% RZV
versus 0.3% placebo), death with no specified cause (0.2%
RZV versus 0.3% placebo) and cardiac arrest (0.2% RZV
versus 0.2% placebo).
One fatal AE was considered possibly related to RZV by the
investigator.[21,22] The study participant was male, 90 years of age and had
a medical history of stable immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, as well as several
cardiac-related conditions. He was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia 75 days
after the first vaccine dose and was hospitalized and withdrawn from the study.
He was readmitted to hospital 96 days after vaccination with febrile neutropenia
and died a day later due to neutropenic sepsis.A new pIMD or a possible exacerbation of an existing pIMD was experienced by 0.6%
and 0.7% of participants in the RZV and placebo groups, respectively, in the
year post last vaccination and by 1.2% and 1.4%, respectively, during the entire
study period (Figure
3(c)).
Overall, in different racial subgroups, men and women, and participants
50−69 and ⩾70 years of age, the incidence of pIMD was similar between RZV and
placebo recipients. Over the entire study period, the pIMDs reported in ⩾0.1% of
RZV recipients were polymyalgia rheumatica (0.2% RZV versus
0.2% placebo), rheumatoid arthritis (0.1% RZV versus 0.2%
placebo), psoriasis (0.1% RZV versus 0.1% placebo), autoimmune
thyroiditis (0.1% RZV versus 0.1% placebo) and VIIth nerve
paralysis (0.1% RZV versus 0% placebo).
An analysis of participants with a pre-existing pIMD showed that 95.6% of
RZV recipients and 95.0% of placebo recipients did not experience either an
exacerbation of their existing condition nor a new pIMD.Overall, except for the expected local and systemic symptoms, the safety results
were comparable between the RZV and placebo groups irrespective of participant
race (White, Black, Asian, Other).
In Asian populations ⩾50 years of age, RZV has an acceptable safety
profile, similar to what was observed in the general ZOE-50/70 populations.
Studies in immunocompromised populations
The burden of HZ is higher in immunocompromised populations than
in the general population. A study of a US health care claims database showed that
the incidence of HZ was more than three times higher in patients who had received
recent care for transplantation, HIV infection or cancer (10.3 per 1,000 persons per
year) than individuals without such care (3.0 per 1,000 persons per year).
Another study of a US health care plan reported that patients with
hematologic malignancies and those with solid tumors had an age- and
sex-standardized rate of HZ that was 4.8 times higher and 1.9 times higher,
respectively, than the rate in the general population.
A study of patients who had received an autologous hematopoietic stem cell
transplant (HSCT) reported an overall HZ incidence of 62 per 1,000 persons per year
(31 per 1,000 in patients who received antiviral prophylaxis and 152 per 1,000 in
those who did not),
while another study in solid organ transplant recipients reported an
incidence of 22 per 1,000 persons per year.
Patients living with HIV are also at greater risk of HZ, even in the age of
highly active antiretroviral treatment, with rates approximately three times higher
than the general population.[29,30] Complication rates are also
higher in HIV-infected individuals.This review focuses on five randomized, placebo-controlled studies of RZV in
immunocompromised adults ⩾18 years of age: autologous HSCT (NCT01610414);[12,13] HIV
(NCT01165203);[14,15] solid tumors (NCT01798056);
hematologic malignancies (NCT01767467);[17,18] and renal transplant (NCT02058589).
An overview of the study design, patient population, and vaccination schedule
is shown in Table 2.
The mean age at first vaccination ranged from 52 to 59 years, with exception of the
HIV trial in which the mean age was approximately 45 years. Excluding the HIV trial,
25−37% of vaccinees were 18−49 years of age; in the HIV trial, approximately 65%
were 18−49 years of age (Table
2).
Table 2.
Study design and patient population in clinical trials of RZV in
immunocompromised populations.
Two-dose scheduleDose 1: 50−70 days after
transplantDose 2: 1−2 months after Dose 1
Three-dose schedule at Months 0, 2, and 6
Two-dose scheduleDoses administered 1−2
months apart. First dose was given either prior to or at the
start of the chemotherapy cycle. Second dose was given with a
subsequent chemotherapy cycle.a
Two-dose scheduleDoses administered 1−2
months apart during or after full cancer therapy courseb
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell
transplant; N, number of participants in the total vaccinated cohort;
RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.
The total vaccinated cohort for safety included all participants with at
least one documented dose.
Participants were stratified (4:1) according to the timing of the first
RZV or placebo dose with respect to the start of the first (or
occasionally second) cycle of a chemotherapy course: first vaccination
8−30 days before the start of a cycle (pre-chemotherapy groups) or first
vaccination within 1 day of the start of a cycle (on-chemotherapy
groups). Paticipants received their second vaccination with a subsequent
chemotherapy cycle.
Participants were vaccinated during a cancer therapy course (each dose at
least 10 days before and after any cancer therapy) or after the full
cancer therapy course (first dose between 10 days and 6 months after
therapy).
Study design and patient population in clinical trials of RZV in
immunocompromised populations.HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell
transplant; N, number of participants in the total vaccinated cohort;
RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.The total vaccinated cohort for safety included all participants with at
least one documented dose.Participants were stratified (4:1) according to the timing of the first
RZV or placebo dose with respect to the start of the first (or
occasionally second) cycle of a chemotherapy course: first vaccination
8−30 days before the start of a cycle (pre-chemotherapy groups) or first
vaccination within 1 day of the start of a cycle (on-chemotherapy
groups). Paticipants received their second vaccination with a subsequent
chemotherapy cycle.Participants were vaccinated during a cancer therapy course (each dose at
least 10 days before and after any cancer therapy) or after the full
cancer therapy course (first dose between 10 days and 6 months after
therapy).In line with the pivotal phase-3 trials in older adults (⩾50 years), injection site
pain, fatigue, myalgia and headache were the most common solicited AEs, and occurred
more often in the RZV group than in the placebo group (Figure 1). All five studies found that there
were no clinically relevant differences in the incidence of SAEs, fatal SAEs or
pIMDs between the RZV and placebo groups (Figure 3). SAEs were reported by 28.5% (RZV)
and 26.1% (placebo) of participants in the autologous HSCT study, 8.1% (RZV) and
4.1% (placebo) in the HIV study, 30.8% (RZV) and 36.5% (placebo) in the solid tumor
study, 23.3% (RZV) and 29.4% (placebo) in the hematologic malignancies study and
19.7% (RZV) and 25.0% (placebo) in the renal transplant study (Figure 3(a)). The most frequent SAEs by
system organ class (SOC) were neoplasms in the autologous HSCT trial,
and infections and infestations in the solid tumors, hematologic
malignancies, and renal transplant trials.[16,18,19] In the HIV trial, only six
and two participants in the RZV and placebo groups, respectively, reported a SAE; no
event occurred more than once in a SOC. The percentage of participants who
experienced fatal AEs or pIMDs in the studies is shown in Figure 3(b) and (c). In the hematologic malignancy trial, one
neonatal death occurred in an offspring born at 36 weeks’ gestation to a mother who
received RZV before pregnancy (approximately 34 days before her last menstrual
period). The investigator assessed this fatal SAE as possibly related to study
vaccine. The mother was treated with chemotherapy before pregnancy for her
underlying malignancy. The neonate was born with no apparent congenital anomalies
and died 30 minutes after birth because of breathing difficulties. The Company
considered that the neonatal death was possibly due to perinatal causes.The studies in immunocompromised populations also assessed specific AEs of interest
related to patients’ underlying conditions. In the autologous HSCT trial, 26% of RZV
recipients and 27% of placebo recipients had a malignancy relapse during the entire
study period.
In the HIV trial, 12% of participants in the RZV group and 10% in the placebo
group reported worsening of HIV disease through to Month 7 of the study.
Overall, RZV had no sustained impact on CD4+ cell counts or HIV RNA loads.
In the hematologic malignancies trial, relapse or progression of the original
malignancy was reported in 16% of RZV recipients and 21% of placebo recipients
during the entire study period.
In the study of renal transplant patients, biopsy-proven rejection occurred
in 3% and 5% of RZV and placebo recipients, respectively, during the whole study
period; of these, one of four rejections in the RZV group and seven of seven
rejections in the placebo group occurred in patients at low risk of rejection.
In the solid tumor trial, relapse or worsening of patients’ condition was not
a pre-defined safety endpoint.
Post-marketing surveillance
Monitoring of vaccine safety in the real-world setting after
licensure is essential. Post-marketing safety surveillance of spontaneously reported
AEs following vaccine administration allows data to be collected rapidly following
real-world use of the product in the general population, including people who would
not normally be included in clinical trials (such as high-risk individuals or those
receiving concomitant medication). In addition, real-world surveillance allows
identification of less frequent events that would not be detected in the smaller
clinical trial populations.Post-marketing safety surveillance data, comprising spontaneous reports of AEs
following RZV vaccination, have been reported for the period 13 October 2017 to 10
February 2019.
Spontaneous report data were either reported voluntarily to GSK directly or
were collated by GSK from the scientific literature or interactive digital media.
Follow-up was conducted if required to obtain information needed for scientific
evaluation of the event. Spontaneous report data from GSK sources were analyzed
using the Signal Mining and Management (SMM) tool which flagged signals if there was
disproportionate reporting or an unexpected time-to-onset distribution. Data from
external sources were reviewed separately for the purpose of signal detection,
including spontaneous report data from public safety databases: the US Vaccine
Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online
Database, and the European Medicines Agency EudraVigilance system. In addition,
observed-to-expected analyses were performed for all-cause mortality and the most
frequently reported pIMDs.During the reporting period, 9,323,118 vaccine doses were distributed, of which
approximately 8.4 million were distributed in the US. There were 15,638 spontaneous
reports of individuals experiencing 37,697 AEs following RZV administration, of
which 95.3% were considered non-serious.
The most commonly reported AEs were consistent with the reactogenicity
profile of the vaccine observed in clinical trials, for example, pain, redness, and
swelling at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and myalgia (Table 3). A specific
analysis of symptoms potentially related to reactogenicity identified 4639 reports,
corresponding to a rate of 49.8 reports per 100,000 doses distributed. Injection
site reactions comprised 61.4% of these reports, most commonly pain. Most events
were non-serious (95.9%), occurred within the first few days after vaccination, and
generally lasted for 3−4 days.
Of the 15,638 total reports, 805 (5.1%) described symptoms potentially linked
to severe reactogenicity. Of these, the most commonly reported AEs were decreased
mobility of the injected arm (1.8 reports per 100,000 doses distributed) and
extensive swelling of the injected arm (1.4 reports per 100,000 doses distributed).
These events occurred within the first few days after vaccination and generally
lasted for 3–4 days, although symptoms persisted for a week or more on rare occasions.
Table 3.
Common AEs with RZV reported in post-marketing surveillance (occurring at a
reporting rate of ⩾5 per 100,000 doses distributed).
Symptom (MedDRA preferred term)
Number (%) of reportsa
Reporting rate per 100,000 doses distributed
Injection site pain
1,699 (10.9)
18.2
Pyrexia
1,658 (10.6)
17.8
Pain in extremity
1,466 (9.4)
15.7
Pain
1,326 (8.5)
14.2
Chills
1,240 (7.9)
13.3
Injection site erythema
1,221 (7.8)
13.1
Fatigue
1,085 (6.9)
11.6
Headache
1,076 (6.9)
11.5
Influenza-like illness
866 (5.5)
9.3
Herpes zoster
837 (5.4)
9.0
Myalgia
802 (5.1)
8.6
Injection site swelling
787 (5.0)
8.4
Erythema
649 (4.2)
7.0
Malaise
647 (4.1)
6.9
Nausea
556 (3.6)
6.0
Rash
540 (3.5)
5.8
AE, adverse event; MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities;
RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.
Percentage calculated from the total of 15,638 reports.
Common AEs with RZV reported in post-marketing surveillance (occurring at a
reporting rate of ⩾5 per 100,000 doses distributed).AE, adverse event; MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities;
RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.Percentage calculated from the total of 15,638 reports.A total of 741 (4.7%) reports were classified as serious, defined as any untoward
medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires
hospitalization or prolongs existing hospitalization, results in disability or
incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring, or is a
medically important event.
The most commonly reported events were HZ (27.6%), pyrexia (9.6%), pain in
extremity (9.2%), and pain (8.4%). Nine deaths were reported, for which five reports
did not contain sufficient information for further evaluation. Of the other four
reports, one individual died at an unspecified time after vaccination, possibly due
to sepsis; this person was possibly immunosuppressed and was undergoing treatment
with rituximab for primary membranous nephropathy. The deaths of two individuals
with cardiac risk factors, who died on the same day and 3 days after vaccination,
were associated with cardiovascular disease. The fourth report was of Guillain–Barré
Syndrome (GBS) which occurred at an unspecified time after the second dose of RZV
and an unknown quadrivalent influenza vaccine; the individual died possibly due to
GBS complications 1 week after diagnosis. The observed-to-expected analysis found
that all-cause mortality in the 7-day period following vaccination was below the
expected range, possibly indicating a high level of under-reporting.A total of 114 pIMDs were reported in 104 individuals, corresponding to a reporting
rate of 1.1 per 100,000 doses distributed.
The pIMDs reported were diverse and fell into a range of disease categories.
Events occurring in five or more vaccinees were Bell’s palsy (25 events), GBS (17
events), polymyalgia rheumatica (6 events), and five events each of uveitis,
rheumatoid arthritis and vasculitis. All reports with a known time-to-onset occurred
within 60 days post-vaccination and more than half occurred within 1 week
post-vaccination. The reports of Bell’s palsy and GBS during the reporting period
(13 October 2017 to 10 February 2019) corresponded to 0.27 and 0.18 cases per
100,000 doses, respectively. Observed-to-expected analysis of Bell’s palsy
considering risk periods of 7 or 30 days after vaccination found a below than
expected number of events. A lower than expected number of GBS cases was also found
considering a risk period of 42 days after vaccination.There were 865 spontaneous reports of HZ, comprising 837 HZ cases and 50 HZ complications.
A suspected vaccination failure was defined as the occurrence of HZ clinical
symptoms suggestive of VZV infection occurring ⩾30 days after completion of a full
RZV vaccination schedule. A confirmed vaccination failure was defined as the
occurrence of HZ clinical symptoms and laboratory confirmation of VZV infection
occurring ⩾30 days after completion of a full RZV vaccination schedule. A total of
176 reports met the criteria for a suspected vaccination failure (1.9 reports per
100,000 doses distributed) and two reports met the criteria for a confirmed
vaccination failure (0.02 reports per 100,000 doses distributed). Most reports came
from Canada (68.5%) from a non-medically confirmed source, possibly as a result of
the RZV Facebook page in Canada turning on the capability to comment on the page.
The reports of HZ complications comprised 25 reports of HZ ophthalmicus, 21 reports
of PHN, two reports of HZ with neurologic infection and two reports of HZ
oticus.A substantial proportion of the spontaneous reports (3579/15,638, 22.9%) was linked
to vaccination error.
The most common vaccination errors were product preparation errors
(n = 1062, 29.7%), inappropriate or incomplete course of
administration (n = 956, 26.7%), incorrect route of administration
(n = 585, 16.3%), and storage errors (n = 463,
12.9%). A total of 17.3% of vaccination error reports were associated with symptoms,
mainly injection site reactions following subcutaneous instead of intramuscular
injection. Most of the errors during vaccine preparation were the administration of
the liquid AS01B only or mixing the RZV lyophilized antigen with a
diluent other than the supplied adjuvant system. Most errors occurred in the US
(where most doses were distributed) and might be explained by unfamiliarity of
health care professionals with RZV in the early days of its use.
Some confusion might have arisen because the live attenuated virus zoster
vaccine, available in the US for a decade, is reconstituted prior to subcutaneous
administration by injecting diluent into a vial containing the lyophilized
component. Early VAERS data on RZV administration errors during the first 4 months
following licensure in the US drew similar conclusions.
Errors decreased substantially following a program of education and training
of health care professionals involved in administering the vaccine.During routine medical review of post-marketing data from the reporting period
October 2017 to February 2019, a possible causal relationship between RZV and
certain hypersensitivity reactions (mainly different types of rash, urticaria, and
angioedema) could not be excluded and the prescribing information has been updated accordingly.
The RZV vaccine is contraindicated in persons with a history of severe
allergic reactions (e.g. anaphylaxis) to any component of the vaccine or after a
previous dose of the vaccine.
In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) have conducted a safety analysis of RZV in VAERS.
During the first 8 months of use, VAERS received 4381 AE reports. It was
concluded that no unexpected patterns were detected in reports of AEs or SAEs, and
the findings were consistent with the safety profile of RZV in prelicensure clinical trials.In 2018, a statistical signal for GBS following RZV receipt was detected in the
Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Rapid Cycle Analysis (RCA). The US CDC consulted with
the FDA on additional analyses in other databases.
Subsequently, the FDA in collaboration with the CDC and Center for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS) initiated an assessment of the risk of GBS following
RZV receipt in the US Medicare population aged 65 years or older. In 2020, new
information on GBS emerged from the post-marketing observational study in
individuals aged 65 years or older which showed an increased risk of GBS (estimated
3 excess cases per million doses administered) during the 42 days following
vaccination.[33,35,36] Based on this evaluation, the FDA has determined that the
results of this observational study show an association of GBS with RZV, but that
available evidence is insufficient to establish a causal relationship. Moreover, the
FDA determined that the benefits of vaccination with RZV continue to outweigh its risks.
Having considered the findings of the additional CDC and FDA analyses in
February 2021, the Herpes Zoster Work Group of the United States Advisory Committee
on Immunization Practices (ACIP) also concluded that clinical trials, observational
studies, and benefit-risk analysis confirm the considerable benefits of RZV
vaccination in preventing HZ, severe disease and complications.Spontaneously reported AEs are analyzed continuously. To date, reports received are
generally consistent with what was observed in the clinical trials and with the
reactogenicity profile of the vaccine, in line with published safety surveillance data
and as reflected in approved prescribing information for RZV.
Conclusion
In clinical trials, the incidence and nature of SAEs and fatal
AEs were similar in the RZV and placebo groups. Reactogenicity symptoms occurred
more frequently with RZV than with placebo.[10-12,14,16,17,19,21] This is likely a secondary
consequence of the enhanced innate immune responses elicited at the site of
injection and therefore is not unexpected. It is consistently observed in studies
evaluating AS01B and other adjuvanted vaccines, in which higher
frequencies of mostly mild and transient local and systemic reactions are observed
with adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted vaccines.[24,37] These data do
not raise concern. Following the first year of post-marketing surveillance, the
safety profile of RZV is consistent with that observed in clinical trials.Importantly, reactogenicity following RZV administration did not affect quality of
life, although participants who experienced Grade-3 reactogenicity had a transient
decrease in physical functioning on the Short Form (36) Health Survey and in the
Euroqol-5 dimensions score.[38,39] The reported quality-adjusted life-year losses resulting from
reactogenicity were 300−3000 times lower than those associated with HZ.[38-41]Several studies are currently ongoing and planned to further assess the safety of RZV
in real-world settings. Overall, the clinical safety data for RZV are reassuring.
Along with high vaccine efficacy shown in the clinical trials, the available data
support a favorable benefit–risk profile for RZV.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tav-10.1177_25151355211057479 for Safety and
reactogenicity of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: experience from
clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance by Joseph Fiore, Maribel Miranda
Co-van der Mee, Andrés Maldonado, Lisa Glasser and Phil Watson in Therapeutic
Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Authors: Robert W Johnson; Marie-José Alvarez-Pasquin; Marc Bijl; Elisabetta Franco; Jacques Gaillat; João G Clara; Marc Labetoulle; Jean-Pierre Michel; Luigi Naldi; Luis S Sanmarti; Thomas Weinke Journal: Ther Adv Vaccines Date: 2015-07
Authors: Fernanda Tavares Da Silva; Filip De Keyser; Paul-Henri Lambert; William H Robinson; René Westhovens; Christian Sindic Journal: Vaccine Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Nicolas Lecrenier; Pierre Beukelaers; Romulo Colindres; Desmond Curran; Carine De Kesel; Jean-Philippe De Saegher; Arnaud M Didierlaurent; Edouard Y Ledent; Johann F Mols; Tomas Mrkvan; Marie Normand-Bayle; Lidia Oostvogels; Fernanda Tavares Da Silva; Ventzislav Vassilev; Carlota Vinals; Alain Brecx Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 5.217
Authors: Ralph P Insinga; Robbin F Itzler; James M Pellissier; Patricia Saddier; Alexander A Nikas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sophie Grabar; Pierre Tattevin; Hana Selinger-Leneman; Arnaud de La Blanchardiere; Pierre de Truchis; Christian Rabaud; David Rey; Vincent Daneluzzi; Samuel Ferret; Anne-Sophie Lascaux; Thomas Hanslik; Dominique Costagliola; Odile Launay Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-01-18 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Himal Lal; Anthony L Cunningham; Olivier Godeaux; Roman Chlibek; Javier Diez-Domingo; Shinn-Jang Hwang; Myron J Levin; Janet E McElhaney; Airi Poder; Joan Puig-Barberà; Timo Vesikari; Daisuke Watanabe; Lily Weckx; Toufik Zahaf; Thomas C Heineman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Asher Chanan-Khan; Pieter Sonneveld; Michael W Schuster; Edward A Stadtmauer; Thierry Facon; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Dina Ben-Yehuda; Sagar Lonial; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Donna Reece; Rachel Neuwirth; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kathleen L Dooling; Angela Guo; Manisha Patel; Grace M Lee; Kelly Moore; Edward A Belongia; Rafael Harpaz Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Kenneth E Schmader; Myron J Levin; Katrijn Grupping; Sean Matthews; David Butuk; Michael Chen; Mohamed El Idrissi; Laurence A Fissette; Charles Fogarty; Paul Hartley; Nicola P Klein; Max Nevarez; Kari Uusinarkaus; Lidia Oostvogels; Desmond Curran Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 6.053