Literature DB >> 27943408

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated With Better Bone Microarchitecture But Lower Bone Material Strength and Poorer Physical Function in Elderly Women: A Population-Based Study.

Anna G Nilsson1, Daniel Sundh1, Lisa Johansson1, Martin Nilsson1, Dan Mellström1, Robert Rudäng1, Michail Zoulakis1, Märit Wallander1,2, Anna Darelid1, Mattias Lorentzon1.   

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of fractures according to several studies. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, although small case-control studies indicate poor quality of the cortical bone. We have studied a population-based sample of women aged 75 to 80 years in Gothenburg, randomly invited from the population register. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic Discovery A), bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT; ExtremeCT from Scanco Medical AG), and reference point indentation was performed with Osteoprobe (Active Life Scientific). Women with T2DM (n = 99) had higher aBMD compared to controls (n = 954). Ultradistal tibial and radial trabecular bone volume fraction (+11% and +15%, respectively), distal cortical volumetric BMD (+1.6% and +1.7%), cortical area (+11.5% and +9.3%), and failure load (+7.7% and +12.9%) were higher in diabetics than in controls. Cortical porosity was lower (mean ± SD: 1.5% ± 1.1% versus 2.0% ± 1.7%, p = 0.001) in T2DM in the distal radius but not in the ultradistal radius or the tibia. Adjustment for covariates (age, body mass index, glucocorticoid treatment, smoking, physical activity, calcium intake, bone-active drugs) eliminated the differences in aBMD but not in HR-pQCT bone variables. However, bone material strength index (BMSi) by reference point indentation was lower in T2DM (74.6 ± 7.6 versus 78.2 ± 7.5, p < 0.01), also after adjustment, and women with T2DM performed clearly worse in measures of physical function (one leg standing: -26%, 30-s chair-stand test: -7%, timed up and go: +12%, walking speed: +8%; p < 0.05-0.001) compared to controls. In conclusion, we observed a more favorable bone microarchitecture but no difference in adjusted aBMD in elderly women with T2DM in the population compared to nondiabetics. Reduced BMSi and impaired physical function may explain the increased fracture risk in T2DM.
© 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE MATERIAL STRENGTH; BONE MICROARCHITECTURE; BONE MICROINDENTATION; HR-PQCT; OSTEOPOROSIS; TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27943408     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  58 in total

1.  Bone microarchitecture, biomechanical properties, and advanced glycation end-products in the proximal femur of adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Lamya Karim; Julia Moulton; Miranda Van Vliet; Kelsey Velie; Ann Robbins; Fatemeh Malekipour; Ayesha Abdeen; Douglas Ayres; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Local bone quality measurements correlates with maximum screw torque at the femoral diaphysis.

Authors:  Christopher M McAndrew; Avinesh Agarwalla; Adam C Abraham; Eric Feuchtbaum; William M Ricci; Simon Y Tang
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Targeting Cell Senescence for the Treatment of Age-Related Bone Loss.

Authors:  Robert J Pignolo; Rebekah M Samsonraj; Susan F Law; Haitao Wang; Abhishek Chandra
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  The use of microindentation for the study of bone properties in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  S Ballesta; R C Güerri-Fernández; J J Chillarón; A Güell; S Herrera; E Torres; N G Ascoeta; J A Flores Le-Roux; A Díez
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Low bone toughness in the TallyHO model of juvenile type 2 diabetes does not worsen with age.

Authors:  Amy Creecy; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mustafa Unal; R Clay Bunn; Paul Voziyan; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Diabetes and Deficits in Cortical Bone Density, Microarchitecture, and Bone Size: Framingham HR-pQCT Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Serkalem Demissie; L Adrienne Cupples; Xiaochun Zhang; Hanfei Xu; Ching-Ti Liu; Steven K Boyd; Robert R McLean; Kerry E Broe; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  PTH and bone material strength in hypoparathyroidism as measured by impact microindentation.

Authors:  J R Starr; G Tabacco; R Majeed; B Omeragic; L Bandeira; M R Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Assessment of bone quality in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  N Jiang; W Xia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Robust Trabecular Microstructure in Type 2 Diabetes Revealed by Individual Trabecula Segmentation Analysis of HR-pQCT Images.

Authors:  Jessica F Starr; Leonardo C Bandeira; Sanchita Agarwal; Ankit M Shah; Kyle K Nishiyama; Yizhong Hu; Donald J McMahon; X Edward Guo; Shonni J Silverberg; Mishaela R Rubin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  The Role of Matrix Composition in the Mechanical Behavior of Bone.

Authors:  Mustafa Unal; Amy Creecy; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.