Literature DB >> 34998224

Effect of positioning on blood pressure measurement in pregnancy.

Monica C Myers1, Debra S Brandt1, April Prunty2, Stephanie Gilbertson-White2, Amy Sanborn3, Mark K Santillan4, Donna A Santillan1.   

Abstract

Blood pressure is the key vital sign to detecting hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. The importance of taking blood pressure properly was recently underscored by the publication of updated ACC/AHA guidelines for measuring blood pressure in patients. However, the recommended position of seating with arms and back supported is not always feasible to achieve clinically, especially for inpatient women who are pregnant. Therefore, it is clinically important to understand the effects of alternative patient positioning on blood pressure measurements. We conducted a review of studies which considered patient position on the effect of blood pressure in pregnancy. This review demonstrates that clinically significant differences may occur based on patient positioning. Despite the small number of primary studies that include pregnant women, notable reductions in blood pressure measurements have been observed in the left lateral recumbent position, a common position during labor or during monitoring, in comparison to measurements taken in the supported seated position. Ultimately, these differences could affect the clinical management of patients and care should be taken to document and consider the position in which the reading was taken.
Copyright © 2022 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure measurement; Fowler's; Left lateral; Patient positioning; Pregnancy; Supine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34998224      PMCID: PMC8959067          DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens        ISSN: 2210-7789            Impact factor:   2.899


  15 in total

1.  Effect of blood pressure instrument and cuff side on blood pressure reading in pregnant women in the lateral recumbent position.

Authors:  S M Kinsella
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.603

2.  Uterine blood flow during supine rest and exercise after 28 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  R M Jeffreys; W Stepanchak; B Lopez; J Hardis; J F Clapp
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  The haemodynamic, renal excretory and hormonal changes induced by resting in the left lateral position in normal pregnant women during late gestation.

Authors:  F A Almeida; M V Pavan; C I S Rodrigues
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Cardiac index in term pregnant women in the sitting, lateral, and supine positions: an observational, crossover study.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Roshan Fernando; Malachy Columb; Tanya Jones
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Effect of change in posture on maternal functional hemodynamics at 35-37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  G P Guy; H Z Ling; M Machuca; L C Poon; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  An inaccurate automated device negatively impacts the diagnosis and treatment of gestational hypertension.

Authors:  Diane Nzelu; Felicia Yeung; Delphine Couderq; Andrew Shennan; Nikos A Kametas
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 7.  Physiology of blood pressure relevant to managing hypertension in pregnancy.

Authors:  Nnabuike C Ngene; Jagidesa Moodley
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-27

8.  Hemodynamic changes in women with symptoms of supine hypotensive syndrome.

Authors:  Aimee Humphries; Seyed A Mirjalili; Gregory P Tarr; John M D Thompson; Peter Stone
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Accuracy validation of the Microlife 3AS1-2 blood pressure device in a pregnant population with low blood pressure.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Annemarie de Greeff; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.444

10.  Influence of the prone position on a stretcher for pregnant women on maternal and fetal hemodynamic parameters and comfort in pregnancy.

Authors:  Claudia Oliveira; Marco Antonio Borges Lopes; Agatha Sacramento Rodrigues; Marcelo Zugaib; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.365

View more
  1 in total

1.  Machine Learning and Electrocardiography Signal-Based Minimum Calculation Time Detection for Blood Pressure Detection.

Authors:  Majid Nour; Derya Kandaz; Muhammed Kursad Ucar; Kemal Polat; Adi Alhudhaif
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.