R M Jeffreys1, W Stepanchak, B Lopez, J Hardis, J F Clapp. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Schwartz Center for Metabolism and Nutrition, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that, after 28 weeks of gestation, uterine blood flow during supine rest and supine exercise is no different than uterine blood flow at left-lateral rest. DESIGN: In vivo experimental study in pregnant women. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. POPULATION: Fourteen, physically active, late-pregnant women who continued supine exercise throughout gestation. METHODS: Studies were carried out between 29 and 38 weeks of gestation. Maternal blood pressure, maternal heart rate, and ultrasound estimates of volume blood flow in the right ascending branch of the uterine artery were obtained serially at rest in the left-lateral position, at rest in the supine position, during and immediately after 10 minutes of supine exercise, and again at rest in the left-lateral position. Exercise sessions included alternating 60- to 90-second periods of abdominal crunches and leg exercise at moderate/high intensity (Borg's rating of perceived exertion 14 +/- 1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, heart rate, and uterine artery volume flow. RESULTS: Data are presented as the mean +/- SD. Maternal heart rate and blood pressure were unchanged at supine rest but increased during supine exercise (heart rate increased from 76 +/- 9 to 98 +/- 12 beats per minute, mean arterial pressure increased from 81 +/- 6 to 102 +/- 12 mmHg). Volume flow fell from 410 +/- 93 to 267 +/- 73 cc/minute after 5 minutes of supine rest and then, during supine exercise, increased to 355 +/- 125 cc/minute. Uterine artery luminal diameter and blood flow correlated directly with tissue weights at birth (r(2) values between 0.32 and 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In physically active women, uterine blood flow decreases during both supine rest and supine exercise but the decrease in the former is twice that seen in the latter.
OBJECTIVE: To test the null hypothesis that, after 28 weeks of gestation, uterine blood flow during supine rest and supine exercise is no different than uterine blood flow at left-lateral rest. DESIGN: In vivo experimental study in pregnant women. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. POPULATION: Fourteen, physically active, late-pregnant women who continued supine exercise throughout gestation. METHODS: Studies were carried out between 29 and 38 weeks of gestation. Maternal blood pressure, maternal heart rate, and ultrasound estimates of volume blood flow in the right ascending branch of the uterine artery were obtained serially at rest in the left-lateral position, at rest in the supine position, during and immediately after 10 minutes of supine exercise, and again at rest in the left-lateral position. Exercise sessions included alternating 60- to 90-second periods of abdominal crunches and leg exercise at moderate/high intensity (Borg's rating of perceived exertion 14 +/- 1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, heart rate, and uterine artery volume flow. RESULTS: Data are presented as the mean +/- SD. Maternal heart rate and blood pressure were unchanged at supine rest but increased during supine exercise (heart rate increased from 76 +/- 9 to 98 +/- 12 beats per minute, mean arterial pressure increased from 81 +/- 6 to 102 +/- 12 mmHg). Volume flow fell from 410 +/- 93 to 267 +/- 73 cc/minute after 5 minutes of supine rest and then, during supine exercise, increased to 355 +/- 125 cc/minute. Uterine artery luminal diameter and blood flow correlated directly with tissue weights at birth (r(2) values between 0.32 and 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In physically active women, uterine blood flow decreases during both supine rest and supine exercise but the decrease in the former is twice that seen in the latter.
Authors: Jane Warland; Jillian Dorrian; Allan J Kember; Craig Phillips; Ali Borazjani; Janna L Morrison; Louise M O'Brien Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Alexander Weichert; Andreas Hagen; Michael Tchirikov; Ilka B Fuchs; Wolfgang Henrich; Michael Entezami Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Peter R Stone; Wendy Burgess; Jordan P R McIntyre; Alistair J Gunn; Christopher A Lear; Laura Bennet; Edwin A Mitchell; John M D Thompson Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-12-11 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Esra Abaci Turk; S Mazdak Abulnaga; Jie Luo; Jeffrey N Stout; Henry A Feldman; Ata Turk; Borjan Gagoski; Lawrence L Wald; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Drucilla J Roberts; Carolina Bibbo; Julian N Robinson; Polina Golland; P Ellen Grant; William H Barth Journal: Placenta Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Vaughn A Browne; Lilian Toledo-Jaldin; R Daniela Davila; Luis P Lopez; Henry Yamashiro; Darleen Cioffi-Ragan; Colleen G Julian; Megan J Wilson; Abigail W Bigham; Mark D Shriver; Benjamin Honigman; Enrique Vargas; Robert Roach; Lorna G Moore Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Vaughn A Browne; Colleen G Julian; Lillian Toledo-Jaldin; Darleen Cioffi-Ragan; Enrique Vargas; Lorna G Moore Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Peter R Stone; Wendy Burgess; Jordan McIntyre; Alistair J Gunn; Christopher A Lear; Laura Bennet; Edwin A Mitchell; John M D Thompson Journal: J Physiol Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Robin S Cronin; John M D Thompson; Rennae S Taylor; Jessica Wilson; Karen F Falloon; Sophie Skelton; Elsie Brown; Vicki M Culling; Edwin A Mitchell; Lesley M E McCowan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 2.692