Literature DB >> 26020367

Accuracy validation of the Microlife 3AS1-2 blood pressure device in a pregnant population with low blood pressure.

Hannah L Nathan1, Annemarie de Greeff, Natasha L Hezelgrave, Lucy C Chappell, Andrew H Shennan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the Microlife 3AS1-2 blood pressure (BP) device in pregnant women with low BP to investigate suitability for hypotensive detection in low-income and middle-income countries.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out evaluating the Microlife 3AS1-2, a hand-held, upper-arm, semiautomated BP device, according to British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol methods. Thirty (stable) pregnant women with a clinical systolic BP less than 100 mmHg and/or diastolic BP less than 60 mmHg were recruited from antenatal wards and clinics and their BP was measured by three trained observers at a district-level hospital in South Africa. Accuracy was assessed according to the BHS grading criteria (A/B=pass) and the ANSI/AAMI/ISO standard for mean difference and SD (≤5±8 mmHg).
RESULTS: The device achieved an A/A grade according to the BHS grading criteria. The mean difference±SD between the observer and the test device was 0.5±6.2 and 1.3±5.4 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, fulfilling the standard required by the ANSI/AAMI/ISO protocol. All observer differences were within 4 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: According to the BHS protocol, the Microlife 3AS1-2 BP device is accurate in pregnant women with low BP. The device has been validated previously in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia and also fulfils the criteria of the WHO for use in a low-resource setting. Although unstable women were not included in this validation (for safety and pragmatic reasons), this device could potentially improve the detection of shock secondary to obstetric haemorrhage or sepsis, as well as being used in pre-eclampsia, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26020367     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  19 in total

1.  Reverse innovation in maternal health.

Authors:  Tabassum Firoz; Prestige Tatenda Makanga; Hannah L Nathan; Beth Payne; Laura A Magee
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2017-05-16

Review 2.  Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement Devices in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Validation Studies.

Authors:  Natalie A Bello; Jonathan J Woolley; Kirsten Lawrence Cleary; Louise Falzon; Bruce S Alpert; Suzanne Oparil; Gary Cutter; Ronald Wapner; Paul Muntner; Alan T Tita; Daichi Shimbo
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Effect of positioning on blood pressure measurement in pregnancy.

Authors:  Monica C Myers; Debra S Brandt; April Prunty; Stephanie Gilbertson-White; Amy Sanborn; Mark K Santillan; Donna A Santillan
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 4.  Point-of-care diagnostics to improve maternal and neonatal health in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Catherine E Majors; Chelsey A Smith; Mary E Natoli; Kathryn A Kundrod; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Vital Sign Prediction of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Women with Hypovolemic Shock: The Role of Shock Index.

Authors:  Alison M El Ayadi; Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Elizabeth A Butrick; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Andrew H Shennan; Suellen Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The CRADLE vital signs alert: qualitative evaluation of a novel device designed for use in pregnancy by healthcare workers in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Helena Boene; Khatia Munguambe; Esperança Sevene; David Akeju; Olalekan O Adetoro; Umesh Charanthimath; Mrutyunjaya B Bellad; Annemarie de Greeff; John Anthony; David R Hall; Wilhelm Steyn; Marianne Vidler; Peter von Dadelszen; Lucy C Chappell; Jane Sandall; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Evaluation of a novel vital sign device to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity in low-resource settings: a mixed method feasibility study for the CRADLE-3 trial.

Authors:  Nicola Vousden; Elodie Lawley; Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Adrian Brown; Tafadzwa Muchengwa; Umesh Charantimath; Mrutyunjaya Bellad; Muchabayiwa Francis Gidiri; Shivaprasad Goudar; Lucy C Chappell; Jane Sandall; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Early warning system hypertension thresholds to predict adverse outcomes in pre-eclampsia: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Annemarie De Greeff; Elodie Lawley; John Anthony; David R Hall; Wilhelm Steyn; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.899

9.  Development and evaluation of a novel Vital Signs Alert device for use in pregnancy in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Nicola Vousden; Elodie Lawley; Annemarie de Greeff; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Nicola Sloan; Nina Tanna; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Muchabayiwa F Gidiri; Jane Sandall; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  BMJ Innov       Date:  2018-09-19

10.  Evaluation of a novel device for the management of high blood pressure and shock in pregnancy in low-resource settings: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial (CRADLE-3 trial).

Authors:  Hannah L Nathan; Kate Duhig; Nicola Vousden; Elodie Lawley; Paul T Seed; Jane Sandall; Mrutyunjaya B Bellad; Adrian C Brown; Lucy C Chappell; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Muchabayiwa F Gidiri; Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.