Literature DB >> 34993583

Comparison of radiation exposure and surgery time between an intraoperative CT with automatic surface registration and a preoperative CT with manual surface registration in navigated spinal surgeries.

Martin Mohammed Marzouk1,2, Yama Afghanyar3, Mark Mahmoud Marzouk4, Sarah Halima Boussouf5, Philipp Hartung6, Marcus Richter6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective matched case-control study was conducted to compare two CT based surgery techniques for navigated screw placement in spinal surgery, whether a reduction of radiation exposure and surgery time could be achieved.
METHODS: We matched cases treated with an intraoperative CT (iCT), regarding the type and number of implants, with cases treated with a preoperative CT (pCT) of one main surgeon. Outcome measures were radiation exposure due to intraoperative control x-rays, radiation exposure due to CT images, and the duration of surgery.
RESULTS: The required radiation exposure could be significantly reduced in the iCT group. For the intraoperative control X-rays by 69% (median (MED) 88.50/standard deviation (SD) 107.84 and MED 286.00/SD 485.04 for iCT and pCT respectively-in Gycm2; p < 0.001) and for the CT examinations by 25% (MED 317.00/SD 158.62 and MED 424.50/SD 225.04 for iCT and pCT respectively-in mGycm; p < 0.001) with no significant change in surgery time. The correlation between the number of segments fused and the necessary surgery time decreased significantly for the iCT group (Pearson product-moment-correlation: r = 0.569 and r = 0.804 for iCT and pCT respectively; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results show that spinal navigation using an intraoperative CT with automatic registration compared to a preoperative CT and intraoperative manual surface registration, allows a significant reduction of radiation exposure, without prolonged surgery time. A significant benefit regarding cut-to-suture-time can be gained with surgeries of a larger scale.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic surface registration; Intraoperative CT; Navigated spine surgery; Radiation exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34993583     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07082-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

Review 1.  Biological effects of cosmic radiation: deterministic and stochastic.

Authors:  E A Blakely
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 2.  Occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon.

Authors:  Gordon Singer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  New ICRP recommendations.

Authors:  A D Wrixon
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 1.394

4.  Navigated pedicle screw placement: experimental comparison between CT- and 3D fluoroscopy-based techniques.

Authors:  Jens Geerling; Thomas Gösling; Anna Gösling; Gil Ortega; Daniel Kendoff; Musa Citak; Christian Krettek; Tobias Hüfner
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-05

Review 5.  Hazards of Ionizing Radiation and its Impact on Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Uri P Hadelsberg; Ran Harel
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Use of the Airo mobile intraoperative CT system versus the O-arm for transpedicular screw fixation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study of 263 patients.

Authors:  Pietro Scarone; Gabriele Vincenzo; Daniela Distefano; Filippo Del Grande; Alessandro Cianfoni; Stefano Presilla; Michael Reinert
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2018-07-06

Review 7.  Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Edward L Nickoloff; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Prospective Comparative Study in Spine Surgery Between O-Arm and Airo Systems: Efficacy and Radiation Exposure.

Authors:  Kaissar Farah; Pierre Coudert; Thomas Graillon; Benjamin Blondel; Henry Dufour; Olivier Gille; Stephane Fuentes
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Daisuke Yoneoka
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States.

Authors:  William C Pannell; David D Savin; Trevor P Scott; Jeffrey C Wang; Michael D Daubs
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.