Literature DB >> 19175129

Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years.

Walter Huda1, Edward L Nickoloff, John M Boone.   

Abstract

This review covers the role of medical physics in addressing issues directly related to patient dosimetry in radiography, fluoroscopy, mammography, and CT. The sections on radiography and fluoroscopy radiation doses review the changes that have occurred during the last 50 to 60 years. A number of technological improvements have contributed to both a significant reduction in patient and staff radiation doses and improvements to the image quality during this period of time. There has been a transition from film-screen radiography with hand dip film processing to electronic digital imaging utilizing CR and DR. Similarly, fluoroscopy has progressed by directly viewing image intensifiers in darkened rooms to modern flat panel image receptor systems utilizing pulsed radiation, automated variable filtration, and digitally processed images. Mammography is one of the most highly optimized imaging procedures performed, because it is a repetitive screening procedure that results in annual radiation exposure. Mammography is also the only imaging procedure in the United States in which the radiation dose is regulated by the federal government. Consequently, many medical physicists have studied the dosimetry associated with screen-film and digital mammography. In this review, a brief history of mammography dose assessment by medical physicists is discussed. CT was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1970s, and has grown into one of the most important modalities available for diagnostic imaging. CT dose quantities and measurement techniques are described, and values of radiation dose for different types of scanner are presented. Organ and effective doses to adult patients are surveyed from the earliest single slice scanners, to the latest versions that include up to two x-ray tubes and can incorporate as many as 256 detector channels. An overview is provided of doses received by pediatric patients undergoing CT examinations, as well as methods, and results, of studies performed to assess the radiation absorbed by the conceptus of pregnant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175129     DOI: 10.1118/1.3013604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Peak skin and eye lens radiation dose from brain perfusion CT based on Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Chris H Cagnon; J Pablo Villablanca; Cynthia H McCollough; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Maria Zankl; John J Demarco; Adam C Turner; Maryam Khatonabadi; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion?

Authors:  Michael David Kraus; Gert Krischak; Peter Keppler; Florian T Gebhard; Uwe H W Schuetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  In vitro dose measurements in a human cadaver with abdomen/pelvis CT scans.

Authors:  Da Zhang; Atul Padole; Xinhua Li; Sarabjeet Singh; Ranish Deedar Ali Khawaja; Diego Lira; Tianyu Liu; Jim Q Shi; Alexi Otrakji; Mannudeep K Kalra; X George Xu; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Radiation exposure for the surgical team in a hybrid-operating room.

Authors:  Konard Schuetze; A Eickhoff; C Dehner; M Schultheiss; F Gebhard; P H Richter
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 5.  Two-dimensional breast dosimetry improved using three-dimensional breast image data.

Authors:  John M Boone; Andrew M Hernandez; J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-06-01

6.  Radiation doses during chest examinations using dose modulation techniques in multislice CT scanner.

Authors:  Roshan S Livingstone; Joe Pradip; Paul M Dinakran; B Srikanth
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-05

7.  Patient-Based Dose Audit for Common Radiographic Examinations With Digital Radiology Systems: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Khalid M Alshamrani; Abdulkader A Alkenawi; Bushra N Alghamdi; Rawan H Honain; Haneen A Alshehri; Marwah O Alshatiri; Noor Mail; Ahmed Subahi; Shaza S Alsharif; Abdulaziz A Qurashi; Shrooq Aldahery; Reham Kaifi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-13

8.  The effects of x-ray beam hardening on detective quantum efficiency and radiation dose.

Authors:  Molly Donovan Wong; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.535

9.  Lodox/Statscan facilitates the early detection of commonly overlooked extracranial injuries in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  H-C Huang; C-Y Fu; C-H Hsieh; Y-C Wang; S-C Wu; R-J Chen; J-C Huang
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Comparison of radiation doses using weight-based protocol and dose modulation techniques for patients undergoing biphasic abdominal computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Roshan S Livingstone; Paul M Dinakaran; Rekha S Cherian; Anu Eapen
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.