Literature DB >> 34993107

Prognostic value of regional strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Xiaorong Chen1,2, Jiangfeng Pan1, Jiner Shu3, Xiaoru Zhang1, Limei Ye1, Lin Chen1, Yi Hu1, Risheng Yu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have demonstrated the performance of regional strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, and the prognostic value of segmental strain remains unknown. This study aimed to explore the prognostic implications of strain parameters generated by CMR feature tracking analysis in HCM patients.
METHODS: In total, 104 clinically diagnosed HCM patients and 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study, and all patients underwent a standard CMR examination. Global and regional strain was computed by short axis, 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber view cine MR imaging using specialized software. Cardiac structure, function, and myocardial strain were compared between the control group and HCM patients, and the event and event-free groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the correlations between clinical and CMR parameters and poor prognosis.
RESULTS: During the follow-up time, 8 patients reached the primary end points and 14 patients reached secondary end points. Regional radial strain of hypertrophic segments (RRS) and regional circumferential strain of hypertrophic segments (RCS) were worse in HCM patients with primary and secondary end points. In univariate Cox regression analysis of RRS, RCS were associated with primary and secondary end points. Regional radial strain of hypertrophic segments [hazard ratio (HR) 1.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-2.38] and RCS (HR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.20-4.59) were independent predictors of primary end points, and RRS (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.09-2.66) and RCS (HR 2.63, 95% CI: 1.20-5.75) remained independent predictors of secondary end points in multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated patients with RRS <10.0% and RCS ≥-8.5% had a higher rate of primary end points, and patients with RRS <17.9% and RCS ≥-12.1% experienced a higher rate of secondary end points.
CONCLUSIONS: In HCM patients, RRS and RCS were associated with primary and secondary end points and remained independent predictors in multivariate analysis. Impaired regional strain may potentially predict poor prognosis in HCM patients. KEYWORDS: Prognosis; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM); cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR); regional strain. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 34993107      PMCID: PMC8666725          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  33 in total

1.  Characteristic myocardial strain identified in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy subjects with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction using a novel multi-layer transthoracic echocardiography technique.

Authors:  Koya Ozawa; Nobusada Funabashi; Hiroyuki Takaoka; Tomoko Kamata; Akiyo Kanaeda; Mariko Saito; Fumio Nomura; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Lucy E Hudsmith; Steffen E Petersen; Jane M Francis; Matthew D Robson; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Prognostic Value of Global Longitudinal Strain in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review of Existing Literature.

Authors:  Albree Tower-Rader; Divyanshu Mohananey; Andrew To; Harry M Lever; Zoran B Popovic; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-09-12

Review 4.  Atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: systematic review.

Authors:  Oliver P Guttmann; M Shafiqur Rahman; Constantinos O'Mahony; Aris Anastasakis; Perry M Elliott
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  New perspectives on the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles; Martin S Maron; Barry J Maron
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  The prognostic value of biventricular long axis strain using standard cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Fuyao Yang; Jie Wang; Yuancheng Li; Weihao Li; Yuanwei Xu; Ke Wan; Jiayu Sun; Yuchi Han; Yucheng Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Left atrial remodeling in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and susceptibility markers for atrial fibrillation identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Barry J Maron; Tammy S Haas; Martin S Maron; John R Lesser; Joseph A Browning; Raymond H Chan; Iacopo Olivotto; Ross F Garberich; Robert S Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Myocardial strain measurement with feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance: normal values.

Authors:  Robin J Taylor; William E Moody; Fraz Umar; Nicola C Edwards; Tiffany J Taylor; Berthold Stegemann; John N Townend; Kan N Hor; Richard P Steeds; Wojciech Mazur; Francisco Leyva
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Prevalence and characteristics of intramural coronary artery in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a coronary computed tomography and invasive angiography study.

Authors:  Changsheng Zhu; Shuiyun Wang; Shengwei Wang; Yanhai Meng; Qiulan Yang; Changrong Nie; Hongtao Sun
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-01

Review 10.  Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update : Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing.

Authors:  Jeanette Schulz-Menger; David A Bluemke; Jens Bremerich; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Raymond J Kim; Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Christopher M Kramer; Dudley J Pennell; Sven Plein; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.