PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to establish a database of left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions in healthy volunteers using steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, the clinical technique of choice, across a wide age range. METHODS: 108 healthy volunteers (63 male, 45 female) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using steady-state free precession sequences. Manual analysis was performed by 2 experienced observers. RESULTS: Left and right ventricular volumes and left ventricular mass were larger in males than females: LV end-diastolic volume 160 +/- 29 mL vs. 135 +/- 26 mL, LV end-systolic volume 50 +/- 16 mL vs. 42 +/- 12 mL; RV end-diastolic volume 190 +/- 33 mL vs. 148 +/- 35 mL, RV end-systolic volume 78 +/- 20 mL vs. 56 +/- 18 mL (p < .05 for all). Normalization of values to body surface area removed the statistical differences for LV volumes, but not for LV mass or RV volumes. With increased age, males showed a significant decrease in volume and mass indices for both ventricles, while female values remained unchanged. Compared to females, males had significantly larger maximal left atrial volumes (103 +/- 30 mL vs. 89 +/- 21 mL, p = .01) and left atrial stroke volumes (58 +/- 23 mL vs. 48 +/- 15 mL, p = .01). There was no difference in left atrial ejection fraction between the sexes. CONCLUSION: We have produced a large database of age-related normal ranges for left and right ventricular function and left atrial function in males and females. This will allow accurate interpretation of clinical and research datasets.
PURPOSE: The aim of this project was to establish a database of left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions in healthy volunteers using steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, the clinical technique of choice, across a wide age range. METHODS: 108 healthy volunteers (63 male, 45 female) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using steady-state free precession sequences. Manual analysis was performed by 2 experienced observers. RESULTS: Left and right ventricular volumes and left ventricular mass were larger in males than females: LV end-diastolic volume 160 +/- 29 mL vs. 135 +/- 26 mL, LV end-systolic volume 50 +/- 16 mL vs. 42 +/- 12 mL; RV end-diastolic volume 190 +/- 33 mL vs. 148 +/- 35 mL, RV end-systolic volume 78 +/- 20 mL vs. 56 +/- 18 mL (p < .05 for all). Normalization of values to body surface area removed the statistical differences for LV volumes, but not for LV mass or RV volumes. With increased age, males showed a significant decrease in volume and mass indices for both ventricles, while female values remained unchanged. Compared to females, males had significantly larger maximal left atrial volumes (103 +/- 30 mL vs. 89 +/- 21 mL, p = .01) and left atrial stroke volumes (58 +/- 23 mL vs. 48 +/- 15 mL, p = .01). There was no difference in left atrial ejection fraction between the sexes. CONCLUSION: We have produced a large database of age-related normal ranges for left and right ventricular function and left atrial function in males and females. This will allow accurate interpretation of clinical and research datasets.
Authors: Sachin Gupta; Susan A Matulevicius; Colby R Ayers; Jarett D Berry; Parag C Patel; David W Markham; Benjamin D Levine; Kelly M Chin; James A de Lemos; Ronald M Peshock; Mark H Drazner Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robert W W Biederman; James A Magovern; Saundra B Grant; Ronald B Williams; June A Yamrozik; Diane A Vido; Vikas K Rathi; Geetha Rayarao; Ketheswaram Caruppannan; Mark Doyle Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 1.637
Authors: Kai Muellerleile; Michael Groth; Dennis Saring; Daniel Steven; Arian Sultan; Imke Drewitz; Boris Hoffmann; Jakob Lueker; Gerhard Adam; Gunnar K Lund; Stephan Willems; Thomas Rostock Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Robin Bülow; Till Ittermann; Marcus Dörr; Axel Poesch; Sönke Langner; Henry Völzke; Norbert Hosten; Marc Dewey Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Kathleen Gilbert; Brett R Cowan; Avan Suinesiaputra; Christopher Occleshaw; Alistair A Young Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2014