Zoey Laskaris1, Chad Milando2,3, Stuart Batterman2, Bhramar Mukherjee4, Niladri Basu5, Marie S O'neill1,2, Thomas G Robins2, Julius N Fobil6. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Environmental Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada. 6. Department of Biological, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Ghana, School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Approximately 2 billion workers globally are employed in informal settings, which are characterized by substantial risk from hazardous exposures and varying job tasks and schedules. Existing methods for identifying occupational hazards must be adapted for unregulated and challenging work environments. We designed and applied a method for objectively deriving time-activity patterns from wearable camera data and matched images with continuous measurements of personal inhalation exposure to size-specific particulate matter (PM) among workers at an informal electronic-waste (e-waste) recovery site. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two workers at the Agbogbloshie e-waste site in Accra, Ghana, wore sampling backpacks equipped with wearable cameras and real-time particle monitors during a total of 171 shifts. Self-reported recall of time-activity (30-min resolution) was collected during the end of shift interviews. Images (N = 35,588) and simultaneously measured PM2.5 were collected each minute and processed to identify activities established through worker interviews, observation, and existing literature. Descriptive statistics were generated for activity types, frequencies, and associated PM2.5 exposures. A kappa statistic measured agreement between self-reported and image-based time-activity data. RESULTS: Based on image-based time-activity patterns, workers primarily dismantled, sorted/loaded, burned, and transported e-waste materials for metal recovery with high variability in activity duration. Image-based and self-reported time-activity data had poor agreement (kappa = 0.17). Most measured exposures (90%) exceeded the World Health Organization (WHO) 24-h ambient PM2.5 target of 25 µg m-3. The average on-site PM2.5 was 81 µg m-3 (SD: 94). PM2.5 levels were highest during burning, sorting/loading and dismantling (203, 89, 83 µg m-3, respectively). PM2.5 exposure during long periods of non-work-related activities also exceeded the WHO standard in 88% of measured data. CONCLUSIONS: In complex, informal work environments, wearable cameras can improve occupational exposure assessments and, in conjunction with monitoring equipment, identify activities associated with high exposures to workplace hazards by providing high-resolution time-activity data.
OBJECTIVES: Approximately 2 billion workers globally are employed in informal settings, which are characterized by substantial risk from hazardous exposures and varying job tasks and schedules. Existing methods for identifying occupational hazards must be adapted for unregulated and challenging work environments. We designed and applied a method for objectively deriving time-activity patterns from wearable camera data and matched images with continuous measurements of personal inhalation exposure to size-specific particulate matter (PM) among workers at an informal electronic-waste (e-waste) recovery site. METHODS: One hundred and forty-two workers at the Agbogbloshie e-waste site in Accra, Ghana, wore sampling backpacks equipped with wearable cameras and real-time particle monitors during a total of 171 shifts. Self-reported recall of time-activity (30-min resolution) was collected during the end of shift interviews. Images (N = 35,588) and simultaneously measured PM2.5 were collected each minute and processed to identify activities established through worker interviews, observation, and existing literature. Descriptive statistics were generated for activity types, frequencies, and associated PM2.5 exposures. A kappa statistic measured agreement between self-reported and image-based time-activity data. RESULTS: Based on image-based time-activity patterns, workers primarily dismantled, sorted/loaded, burned, and transported e-waste materials for metal recovery with high variability in activity duration. Image-based and self-reported time-activity data had poor agreement (kappa = 0.17). Most measured exposures (90%) exceeded the World Health Organization (WHO) 24-h ambient PM2.5 target of 25 µg m-3. The average on-site PM2.5 was 81 µg m-3 (SD: 94). PM2.5 levels were highest during burning, sorting/loading and dismantling (203, 89, 83 µg m-3, respectively). PM2.5 exposure during long periods of non-work-related activities also exceeded the WHO standard in 88% of measured data. CONCLUSIONS: In complex, informal work environments, wearable cameras can improve occupational exposure assessments and, in conjunction with monitoring equipment, identify activities associated with high exposures to workplace hazards by providing high-resolution time-activity data.
Authors: Paul Kelly; Simon J Marshall; Hannah Badland; Jacqueline Kerr; Melody Oliver; Aiden R Doherty; Charlie Foster Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Mark L Glasgow; Carole B Rudra; Eun-Hye Yoo; Murat Demirbas; Joel Merriman; Pramod Nayak; Christina Crabtree-Ide; Adam A Szpiro; Atri Rudra; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lina Mu Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Torsten Feldt; Julius N Fobil; Jürgen Wittsiepe; Michael Wilhelm; Holger Till; Alexander Zoufaly; Gerd Burchard; Thomas Göen Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Melody Oliver; Aiden R Doherty; Paul Kelly; Hannah M Badland; Suzanne Mavoa; Janine Shepherd; Jacqueline Kerr; Simon Marshall; Alexander Hamilton; Charlie Foster Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Lawrencia Kwarteng; Amila M Devasurendra; Zoey Laskaris; John Arko-Mensah; Afua A Amoabeng Nti; Sylvia Takyi; Augustine A Acquah; Duah Dwomoh; Nil Basu; Thomas Robins; Julius N Fobil; Stuart Batterman Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Andrea L S Bulungu; Luigi Palla; Jan Priebe; Lora Forsythe; Pamela Katic; Gwen Varley; Bernice D Galinda; Nakimuli Sarah; Joweria Nambooze; Kate Wellard; Elaine L Ferguson Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Augustine A Acquah; Clive D'Souza; Bernard J Martin; John Arko-Mensah; Paul K Botwe; Prudence Tettey; Duah Dwomoh; Afua Amoabeng Nti; Lawrencia Kwarteng; Sylvia Takyi; Isabella A Quakyi; Thomas G Robins; Julius N Fobil Journal: Int J Ind Ergon Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 2.656
Authors: Zoey Laskaris; Stuart A Batterman; John Arko-Mensah; Bhramar Mukherjee; Julius N Fobil; Marie S O'Neill; Thomas G Robins Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Sylvia A Takyi; Niladri Basu; John Arko-Mensah; Duah Dwomoh; Karel G Houessionon; Julius N Fobil Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 8.943
Authors: Afua Asabea Amoabeng Nti; John Arko-Mensah; Paul K Botwe; Duah Dwomoh; Lawrencia Kwarteng; Sylvia Akpene Takyi; Augustine Appah Acquah; Prudence Tettey; Niladri Basu; Stuart Batterman; Thomas G Robins; Julius N Fobil Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Augustine A Acquah; Clive D'Souza; Bernard J Martin; John Arko-Mensah; Duah Dwomoh; Afua Asabea Amoabeng Nti; Lawrencia Kwarteng; Sylvia A Takyi; Niladri Basu; Isabella A Quakyi; Thomas G Robins; Julius N Fobil Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Afua A Amoabeng Nti; Thomas G Robins; John Arko Mensah; Duah Dwomoh; Lawrencia Kwarteng; Sylvia A Takyi; Augustine Acquah; Niladri Basu; Stuart Batterman; Julius N Fobil Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295