Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) of the Maghreb region: A systematic review of distribution, morphology, and role in the transmission of the pathogens.

BACKGROUND: Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) are important vectors of various human and animal pathogens such as Bartonella bacilliformis, Phlebovirus, and parasitic protozoa of the genus Leishmania, causative agent of leishmaniases that account among most significant vector-borne diseases. The Maghreb countries Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya occupy a vast area of North Africa and belong to most affected regions by these diseases. Locally varying climatic and ecological conditions support diverse sand fly fauna that includes many proven or suspected vectors. The aim of this review is to summarize often fragmented information and to provide an updated list of sand fly species of the Maghreb region with illustration of species-specific morphological features and maps of their reported distribution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature search focused on scholar databases to review information on the sand fly species distribution and their role in the disease transmissions in Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya, surveying sources from the period between 1900 and 2020. Reported distribution of each species was collated using Google Earth, and distribution maps were drawn using ArcGIS software. Morphological illustrations were compiled from various published sources. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: In total, 32 species of the genera Phlebotomus (Ph.) and Sergentomyia (Se.) were reported in the Maghreb region (15 from Libya, 18 from Tunisia, 23 from Morocco, 24 from Algeria, and 9 from Mauritania). Phlebotomus mariae and Se. africana subsp. asiatica were recorded only in Morocco, Ph. mascitti, Se. hirtus, and Se. tiberiadis only in Algeria, whereas Ph. duboscqi, Se. dubia, Se. africana africana, Se. lesleyae, Se. magna, and Se. freetownensis were reported only from Mauritania. Our review has updated and summarized the geographic distribution of 26 species reported so far in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya, excluding Mauritania from a detailed analysis due to the unavailability of accurate distribution data. In addition, morphological differences important for species identification are summarized with particular attention to closely related species such as Ph. papatasi and Ph. bergeroti, Ph. chabaudi, and Ph. riouxi, and Se. christophersi and Se. clydei.

Introduction

Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) are small insects with nocturnal activity, females being hematophagous and feeding on various vertebrate hosts depending on species [1,2]. They live in various habitats, some species thriving in the vicinity of human dwellings and shelters of domestic animals that provide favorable humidity and temperature conditions and breeding sites as their larval stages are terrestrials, living in microhabitats with organic material [1,2]. So far, over 950 described species were classified into several genera, approximately 100 species in both Old and New World are incriminated in transmission of various pathogens including those infecting humans: bacteria Bartonella bacilliformis, sand fly–borne viruses, and, most importantly, parasitic protozoa of the genus Leishmania [3], causative agents of human and veterinary diseases known as leishmaniases that constitute a major health problem, threatening more than 350 million people in many countries and approximately 2 million of new cases reported each year [4].

Regarded as neglected diseases, leishmaniases have a huge impact on affected countries, challenging their public health services, exacerbating poverty, decreasing workers productivities, and threatening various age groups including children [5]. In 2018, of the 200 countries and territories that reported data to WHO, 97 (49%) were considered endemic and 4 countries having previously reported cases of leishmaniasis [6]. The diseases occur in 4 main clinical forms, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), mucocutaneous form (MCL), visceral leishmaniasis (VL) also known as kala-azar, and post–kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). These clinical forms, ranging from self-healing but potentially disfiguring skin lesion to serious visceral disease that is potentially life threatening when untreated, are typically associated with particular Leishmania species; however, the actual clinical outcome depends on multiple factors including the immunocompetence of the patient. The annual incidence of leishmaniasis is estimated at around 0.2 to 0.4 million cases for VL and from 0.7 to 1.2 million cases for CL [7].

The Maghreb region is located between 19° and 37° N and 15W° and 25°E, and it covers an area of 6,045,741 km2 including Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya. In such a vast region, different bioclimatic zones occur ranging from humid to the hyperarid (Fig 1). Leishmaniases are known as dynamic diseases influenced by various factors [8]. Subsequently, between 2004 and 2008, 355 VL and 58,651 CL cases were reported in the Maghreb region [7]. Algeria is ranked first in CL cases and second worldwide after Afghanistan, reporting 44,050 cases, followed by Tunisia (7,631), Libya (3,540), and Morocco (3,430) cases. VL is less frequent, Morocco is ranked first in VL, reporting 152 cases, followed by Algeria with 111, Tunisia with 89 cases, and Libya with 3 cases for the same period [9]. Despite published VL and CL cases in the Maghreb region, the data are compromised by expected underreporting [5].

Fig 1

Bioclimatic stages of the Maghreb region.

These high numbers were the consequence of several human and natural factors such as the looseness of the sand fly control campaigns, strong urbanization of the rural and suburban areas, and changes in land use that stimulate the expansion or migration of the reservoir hosts such as Psammomys obesus from its natural habitats caused by hydric stress and the decrease in food sources; all these factors led to the emergence of new foci of transmission as reported in Algeria [10,11]. Thus, synergic effects of globalization, climatic change, and various human activities allow the parasites and their vectors to spread in space and time as it was noticed in Europe [8].

Sand flies belong to the order Diptera, suborder Nematocera, family Psychodidae, and subfamily Phlebotominae. In the Old World, sand flies are traditionally divided into 7 genera, some of these comprising further subgenera. Sand fly taxonomy is traditionally based on analysis of decisive morphological characters on the head and genitalia [3,12], but the advent of molecular techniques that deploy mainly sequencing analyses of suitable genetic markers [13] provided further insights into cryptic species including challenging taxa of the Maghreb region like Phlebotomus perniciosus and Ph. longicuspis or Ph. riouxi and Ph. chabaudi. Moreover, they allowed to associate males with females, e.g., Chinius samarensis [14], to give an insight about vectors and nonvectors by the detection of DNA parasite or to propose evolutionary systematic [13,15,16]. In addition, next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays and statistical analysis of the subsequent reads were used to help species identification within pooled samples in several virological studies [14-16]. Recently, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), a protein-based method, was introduced for rapid and cost-effective species identification of various arthropods including sand flies upon their species-specific protein profiles [17]. These molecular approaches complement the morphological identification that is still regarded as the golden standard and the backbone of entomological surveys and vector control programs [18].

The incrimination of particular sand fly species as a vector of leishmaniasis is based on assessment of several criteria previously established [1,4,19]. As a complete evaluation of all these criteria requires a sustained field and experimental research, beside sand fly species fully proven as leishmaniasis vectors, many other species are considered as suspected vectors based on circumstantial evidence and partial fulfillment of some of these criteria [15,20]. In the Maghreb region, the omnipresence of many proven and suspected vectors of several Leishmania species supports transmission cycles of both CL and VL [21]. While vast knowledge of sand fly species present in Maghreb countries was accumulated during several decades of focused research including precise morphological analysis of some species, the information remain fragmented, albeit it could serve as a valuable background for advanced molecular studies. The correct and conclusive morphological identification requires accurate and updated identification keys and experienced entomologists who can provide sufficient expertise for evaluation of often minute morphological characters.

This review aimed to update the list of sand fly species so far recorded in the Maghreb region (Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya) providing (i) their presumable geographic distribution with respect to the bioclimatic zones; (ii) their proven or suspected role in pathogen transmission in the Maghreb region (Table 1); and (iii) defining morphological characters that enable a species identification with special attention to taxonomically challenging species such as Ph. chabaudi/Ph. riouxi, Ph. papatasi/Ph. bergeroti, or Ph. perniciosus species complex.

Table 1

Sand fly species their distribution and vectorial role in the Maghreb region.

Genus	Subgenus	Species	Figure		Map of distribution	Country of distribution
			Female	Male		M	A	T	L
Phlebotomus	Phlebotomus	Ph. papatasi*x	4	6	2	X	X	X	X
		Ph. bergeroti	5	7	3	X	X	X	X
	Paraphlebotomus	Ph. sergenti*x	8	9	10	X	X	X	X
		Ph. alexandri	11	12	13	X	X	X	X
		Ph. kazeruni	14	15	16	X	X
		Ph. chabaudi	18	17	19	X	X	X	X
		Ph. riouxi	21	22	20	X	X	X	X
	Larroussius	Ph. perniciosus*x	25	23	26	X	X	X	X
		Ph. perniciosus atypical	-	24	27	X	X	X
		Ph. longicuspis**x	29	28	30	X	X	X	X
		Ph. perfiliewi*	32	31	33	X	X	X
		Ph. ariasi*x	35	34	36	X	X	X	X
		Ph. chadlii	37	38	39	X	X	X
		Ph. langeroni*	41	40	42	X	X	X	X
		Ph. mariae	-	43	44	X
	Transphlebotomus	Ph. mascittii	45	46	47		X
Sergentomyia	Sergentomyia	Se. minuta	48	49	50	X	X	X	X
		Se. fallax	51	52	53	X	X	X	X
		Se. antennata	55	54	56	X	X	X	X
		Se. cincta	57	-	58		X
		Se. schwetzi	59	60	61	X	X	X	X
	Parrotomyia	Se.africana subsp. asiatica	63	-	62	X
		Se. africana subsp. eremitis	66	65	64		X
		Se. lewisi	68	69	67	X	X	X	X
	Grassomyia	Se. dreyfussi	72	71	70	X	X	X	X
	Sintonius	Se. clydei**	75	74	73	X	X	X	X
		Se. christophersi	78	77	76	X	X	X	X
		Se. hirtus	-	80	79		X
		Se. tiberiadis	83	82	81		X

*Proven vector of the parasites in the Maghreb region.

**Detection of Leishmania DNA.

Detection of Phlebovirus RNA.

X, occurrence.

A, Algeria; L, Libya; M, Morocco; T, Tunisia.

Materials and methods

Literature search and data extraction

For our study, we have followed PRISMA-P protocol [22]. We consulted all available data on sand fly fauna of the Maghreb regions, namely Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya. Various databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, Archive de Institut Pasteur d’Algérie (IPA), and Archive de Institut Pasteur de Tunis were searched for available data from the period 1900 to 2020. The available English and French resources published in full text, articles, reports, congress presentations, book chapters, and thesis dissertations containing information on sand flies were added, treated, and analyzed together with data available from the Laboratoire d’Eco-épidémiologie Parasitaire et Génétiques des Populations of Institut Pasteur of Algeria. The following search string was used: terms in title: [(phlebotomine OR sand flies OR sand flies) AND in all fields: (Phlebotomus OR Sergentomyia) AND in all fields: (Phlebotomus OR Paraphlebotomus OR Larroussius OR Transphlebotomus OR Sergentomyia OR Parrotomyia OR Grassomyia OR Sintonius) AND in all fields: (species name) AND in all fields: (distribution OR presence OR occurrence OR report OR spread OR disperse OR detect) AND in all fields:(Algeria OR Libya OR Tunisia OR Maghreb region OR Morocco) AND in all fields: (leishmaniasis OR “cutaneous leishmaniasis” OR “CL” OR “visceral leishmaniasis” OR “VL” “canine leishmaniasis” OR “CanL” OR “Phlebovirus” OR “Bunyaviridae”) AND in all fields: (“neglected tropical diseases” OR “vector- borne diseases”) AND in all fields: (“vector control”)] as suggested by Dvorak and colleagues [23].

Titles relevant to the scope of this review were obtained in full text and selected for inclusion. Beside these, some data also come from direct consultations with experts and their in-house unpublished databases.

The distribution of Moroccan sand fly species was reported in [24-27], Algerian species [11,28-35], Tunisian species [36-38], and Libyan species [39-42]. For each sand fly species, geographical positions of published records (S1 Data) were first gathered in Google Earth software from sourced publications and then processed with ArcGIS Pro software version 2.5.0 for analysis and maps drawing. The bioclimatic zones classification (Fig 1) was based on the Worldwide Bioclimatic Classification System [43].

We adopted the abbreviation for the genus and subgenus according to the last suggestions of the experts during the International Symposium on Phlebotominae Sand Flies (ISOPS) 2016 meeting and the designation “Sand fly” or “Sand flies” along this review since during the same meeting, the experts did not converge to a common designation [44].

Morphological analysis

Morphological illustrations were compiled from the following publications and books: Abonnenc [2], Dedet and colleagues [33], Bailly-Choumara and colleagues [24], Rioux and colleagues [25,26,45-47], Annajar [41], Depaquit and colleagues [48], Léger and colleagues [49,50], Parrot and colleagues [51-53], Croset and colleagues [54,55], El Sawaf and colleagues [56], Chamkhi and colleagues [57], and Theodor and colleagues [58].

Results

I- Genus Phlebotomus

The genus Phlebotomus is defined by the usual absence of cibarial teeth and pigmented patch. The hind end of the abdomen tergites 2 to 6 holds many erected setae that arise from large sockets of the same size as those on the tergite. In Maghreb, the species belong to 4 subgenera: Phlebotomus Rondani, 1843, Paraphlebotomus Theodor, 1948, Larroussius Nitzulescu 1931, and Transphlebotomus Artemiev 1984. In males, the styles bear either 3 terminal and 2 subterminal, rather short spines (subgenus Phlebotomus) or 2 long terminal and 2 or 3 subapical spines without accessory spine (other subgenera). In females, the spermathecae have superficial striation or are annulated with basal structures in some species depending of the subgenus [2,12,59]. The main differences between the species are summarized in Tables A and B in S1 Text for males and females, respectively.

I-1 Subgenus Phlebotomus Rondani, 1843

The species belonging to this subgenus are recognized by (i) large male genitalia with 5 short spines (3 spatulated terminal spines and 2 at the mid-style position) upon a long cylindrical style; (ii) a paramere with 2 lengthy secondary appendices; (iii) short and conical aedeagus; and (iv) a small button at the base of the coxite bearing few long setae. Females possess pharynx armed with large teeth fringed with minute denticules and spermathecae with uniform shaped segments which are ended by a terminal knob. In Maghreb, 2 species of this subgenus were recorded: Ph. papatasi (Scopoli, 1786) and Ph. bergeroti (Parrot, 1934).

I-1-1 Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) papatasi, Scopoli, 1786

It is one of most studied species due to its large geographical area of occurrence and its medical importance as it is the principal vector of the zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) in highland and north of Sahara caused by Leishmania major [60]. Except the zymodeme MON-269 from Algeria, all isolates of L. major in the region belong to zymodeme MON-25 [61,62]. This species also has been reported to transmit the Sicilian virus in Egypt [63] and found infected by Toscana virus (TOSV) in Morocco [64]. It has a vast distribution from northern to the southern part of the Maghreb region (Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, and Libya) with a high abundance in the highlands and north of Sahara between 27°/35° N and −4°/58° E worldwide [65]. It is encountered from the humid to ultra-hyperarid bioclimatic zones (Fig 2).

Fig 2

Distribution of Phlebotomus papatasi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-1-2 Phlebotomus bergeroti Parrot, 1934

This species was shown to transmit L. major under laboratory conditions [66], and it is suspected to play a role in the transmission of this parasite in Burkina Faso, Chad, Egypt, Iran, Mauritania, Oman, and Yemen on the basis of epidemiological evidence [67]. It occurs in the southern part of the Maghreb region (Mauritania, Morocco, Algeria, and Libya), and it is encountered in the hyperarid bioclimatic zone (Fig 3). In central Sahara regions of Algeria (Tamanrasset and Illizi), Ph. bergeroti and Ph. papatasi are often confused in the overlapping areas of occurrence despite the description of distinct characters between the 2 species (Table C in S1 Text). For the females, 2 differences are known: Posterior part of pharynx has weakly distended shape in Ph. papatasi (Fig 4), while it has a bottle shape in Ph. bergeroti (Fig 5). The ascoids length is as long as the fourth antennal segment in Ph. bergeroti compared to Ph. papatasi where the ascoids are shorter. For the males, 4 major differences were highlighted: (i) the number of setae in the basal lobe coxite is typically 6 for Ph. bergeroti and 10 for Ph. papatasi; (ii) the length between the apical and median spines of the style is longer in Ph. papatasi (Fig 6) compared to Ph. bergeroti (Fig 7); (iii) the spines of the style are sharp and spatulated in Ph. papatasi and Ph. bergeroti, respectively; and (iv) the number of the tuft hairs of the coxite is less than 10 in Ph. bergeroti and more than 12 in Ph. papatasi [2].

Fig 3

Distribution of Phlebotomus bergeroti.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 4

Phlebotomus papatasi ♀ [2].

(A) Fourth antenna segment. (B) Spermathecae. (C) Cibarium. (D) Pharynx.

Fig 5

Phlebotomus bergeroti ♀ [2].

(A) Fourth antenna segment. (B) Spermathecae. (C) Cibarium. (D) Pharynx. (E) Abdomen with dressed setae.

Fig 6

Phlebotomus papatasi ♂ [2].

(A) Spines position. (B) Coxite setae. (C) Tuft of seta. (D) Setae of the lateral lobe. (E) Cibarium.

Fig 7

Phlebotomus bergeroti ♂ [2].

(A) Spines position. (B) Coxite setae. (C) Tuft of seta. (D) Setae of the lateral lobe. (E) Paramere.

I-2 Subgenus Paraphlebotomus Theodor, 1948

The pharynx of the females bears large, backwardly directed teeth with smooth margins, which appear as a network. The spermathecae usually have their terminal segment much larger than the other ones. Males have characteristic lobes on the inner surface of their coxite, bearing tufts of long setae, and relatively short style with 4 long spines, 2 near the tip and 2 near the base. Species of this subgenus occur mainly in the Palearctic region, some are proven or suspected to transmit leishmaniases, typically CL due to Leishmania tropica [67]. In Maghreb region, 5 species of the subgenus Paraphlebotomus were recorded:

I-2-1 Phlebotomus sergenti Parrot, 1917

It is the proven vector of various zymodemes of L. tropica complex, including L. killicki-MON 301 [68-71], and suspected vector of L. killicki MON-306, recently reported in the East of Algeria [72]. Furthermore, it was found infected with TOSV in Morocco [73]. This species is collected both inside houses and outdoors, reported in all the Maghreb regions from the north to the central Sahara, occurring in the humid and arid bioclimatic zones (Figs 8–10).

Fig 8

Phlebotomus sergenti ♀[2].

(A) Pharynx. (B) Spermathecae. (C) Fourth antenna segment.

Fig 10

Distribution of Phlebotomus sergenti.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Phlebotomus sergenti ♂ [57].

I-2-2 Phlebotomus alexandri Sinton, 1928

Despite it is the proven vector of VL in China [74], no vectorial role in the Maghreb region was so far reported. In Tunisia, Croset and colleagues [54] suspected its role in leishmaniasis cycle transmission due to its abundancy in dry and rocky biotopes (cavities and crevices dug in rocky cliffs) where rodents especially Ctenodactylus gundi and reptiles occur abound [33]. It was reported in entire Maghreb region, occurring from subhumid to arid bioclimatic zones (Figs 11–13).

Fig 11

Phlebotomus alexandri ♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx. (B) Spermathecae. (C) Fourth antenna segment.

Fig 13

Distribution of Phlebotomus alexandri.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Phlebotomus alexandri ♂ [57].

I-2-3 Phlebotomus kazeruni Theodor and Masghali, 1964

This species is suspected to transmit causative agents of CL in Saudi Arabia [75] and was shown to support development of L. major under laboratory conditions [76]. It was first reported in Morocco but remains rare in Algeria where until now, few females were reported in the north in Constantine and Jijel, also in the central Sahara in Tamanrasset [26,31,77,78]. It occurs in the subhumid and arid bioclimatic zones (Figs 14–16).

Fig 14

Phlebotomus kazeruni ♀ [29,61].

(A) Pharynx. (B) Spermathecae.

Fig 16

Distribution of Phlebotomus kazeruni.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-2-4 Phlebotomus chabaudi Croset, Abonnenc and Rioux, 1970

So far not reported as a vector of any pathogen, it was described in 1970 based on a single male collected in Tunisia (Fig 17) [55]. In 1974, the first female (Fig 18) was collected in Algeria [79,80]. It occurs in the subhumid to arid bioclimatic zones (Fig 19).

Fig 17

Phlebotomus chabaudi ♂ [51,58].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Aedeagus shape.

Fig 18

Phlebotomus chabaudi ♀ [44].

(A) Pharynx. (B) Spermathecae.

Fig 19

Distribution of Phlebotomus chabaudi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-2-5 Phlebotomus riouxi Depaquit, Léger and Killick-Kendrick, 1998

Until now, no role in the transmission of any pathogen has been reported for this species. Its known distribution in the Maghreb region is very limited, reported only in Algeria and Tunisia in the arid and hyper arid bioclimatic zones (Fig 20). It is closely related to Ph. chabaudi: Females are morphologically distinguished only by the absence of lateral pharyngeal teeth (Fig 21), which are present in Ph. chabaudi [15], and males differ by the higher number of setae at the basal coxite (Fig 22).

Fig 20

Distribution of Phlebotomus riouxi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer

Fig 21

Phlebotomus riouxi ♀ [51].

(A) Pharynx. (B) Spermathecae. (C) Third antenna segment. (D) Fourth antenna segment. (E) Fifth antenna segment.

Fig 22

Phlebotomus riouxi ♂ [51].

(A) General genitalia. (B–D) Third, fourth, and fifth antenna segments. (E) Basal lobe of the coxite. (F) Internal face of the basal lobe of the coxite. (G) Aedeagus shape.

I-3 Subgenus Larroussius Nitzulescu 1931

This subgenus includes 7 species present in Maghreb, all either proven or suspected to transmit Leishmania infantum. Males of this subgenus have 5 long spines on the style (3 terminal spines and 2 at the distal position), long aedeagus with species-specific tip shape and simple paramere. In females, pharyngeal armature consists of typical punctiform teeth and segmented spermathecae bear finger-like necked head with a basal structure [59].

I-3-1 Phlebotomus perniciosus Newstead, 1911

This species is significant in the epidemiology of VL as well as canine leishmaniasis (CanL), being the major vector of L. infantum in the western part of the Mediterranean basin [5,21,81,82]. TOSV and Punique virus were isolated from this species in Tunisia [82]. Aedeagus has typically bifurcated at its tip (Fig 23). However, an atypical form of males (for long time confused with Ph. longicuspis) was recently reported in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia; its aedeagus was not typically bifurcated but rather curved at the tip (Fig 24) [30,83,84]. The females are recognized by a necked spermathecae, each spermiduct has a lateral and relatively thick-walled bulb at the base (Fig 25B). In some females, collected in Morocco and Libya, no bulb structures were observed (Fig 25A), which let to speculations that they may belong to the atypical form [24,41], but this was not confirmed yet. This species occurs mainly from the humid to arid bioclimatic zone but can also be found in the Saharan bioclimatic zones in the south area and central Sahara (Figs 26 and 27), albeit with low density compared to the northern regions [30,85].

Fig 23

Phlebotomus perniciosus ♂ [36,57].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Typical aedeagus.

Fig 24

Phlebotomus perniciosus atypical form ♂ [44,57].

(A’) General genitalia. (B) Aedeagus shape.

Fig 25

Phlebotomus perniciosus ♀ [27,52].

(A) Atypical spermathecae. (B) Typical spermathecae. (C) Reservoir at the subterminal part of the duct. (D) Pharynx.

Fig 26

Distribution of Phlebotomus perniciosus.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 27

Distribution of typical Phlebotomus perniciosus.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-3-2 Phlebotomus longicuspis Nitzulescu, 1930

Reported to be naturally infected by unidentified Leishmania parasites [33] and recently shown to be positive for L. infantum DNA by PCR screening [86], it still is a suspected vector of VL in Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia [67]. It has been found infected also by Naples virus in Algeria [87], by Punique virus in Tunisia [82], and by TOSV in Morocco [73]. The males are recognized by a long aedeagus pointed at the tip (Fig 28) whereas the females by long-necked spermathecae similar to Ph. perniciosus but having relatively thin-walled bulb at the base of spermiducts (Fig 29). This species is generally recorded in sympatry with Ph. perniciosus from the subhumid to Sahara bioclimatic zones (Fig 30) [30].

Fig 28

Phlebotomus longicuspis ♂ [44,57].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Aedeagus shapes.

Fig 29

Phlebotomus longicuspis ♀ [52].

(A) Spermathecae. (B) Reservoir at the subterminal part of the duct. (C) Pharynx.

Fig 30

Distribution of Phlebotomus longicuspis.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-3-3 Phlebotomus perfiliewi Parrot, 1930

It is a proven vector of L. infantum in Mediterranean basin. In Algeria, this species transmits L. infantum Mon-24, which causes sporadic CL [88] and TOSV [89]. Depaquit and colleagues [90] showed that this species forms a complex of species that includes 3 taxa: Ph. perfiliewi (Parrot, 1930) s. s., Ph. galilaeus (Theodor, 1958), and Ph. transcaucasicus (Perfiliev, 1937). Males (Fig 31) of these taxa differ in shape of aedeagus, but females are indistinguishable by morphology, all having large lateral and triangular pocket near the opening of each spermiducts (Fig 32). In the Maghreb region, only Ph. perfiliewi s. s. is present, occurring in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia [33,36,90,91]. It is found in subhumid, arid, and subarid regions at the latitudes up to 1,200 meters above the sea [33]. Until now, it was not reported in Libya (Fig 33).

Fig 31

Phlebotomus perfiliewi ♂ [36,57].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Aedeagus shape.

Fig 32

Phlebotomus perfiliewi ♀ [52].

(A) Spermathecae. (B) Reservoir at the subterminal part of the duct. (C) Pharynx.

Fig 33

Distribution of Phlebotomus perfiliewi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-3-4 Phlebotomus ariasi Tonnoir, 1921

It is considered as a proven vector of L. infantum in western part of the European Mediterranean countries, and, rarely, it transmits the located and diffused CL [67]. Until now, a single female was found naturally infected by L. infantum in Morocco [92]. A recent study reported its infection by Sicilian virus in Algeria [93]. Aedeagus is relatively thick with rounded tip (Fig 34). In females, distal half of the spermiducts is swollen (Fig 35). It occurs from the humid to arid bioclimatic zones, mainly in the olive, Ilex oaks, and cedar vegetation parts. In Algeria (Great Kabylia), it was reported at 4,400 meters above sea level [27,33,36]. This species has not been reported in Libya yet (Fig 36).

Fig 34

Phlebotomus ariasi ♂ [36,57].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Aedeagus shape.

Fig 35

Phlebotomus ariasi ♀ [52].

(A) Spermathecae. (B) Reservoir at the subterminal part of the duct. (C) Pharynx.

Fig 36

Distribution of Phlebotomus ariasi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-3-5 Phlebotomus chadlii, Rioux, Juminer et Gibily, 1966

There is no information about its involvement in Leishmania transmission cycles and due to its rare occurrence, it is likely not to be of epidemiological significance. Its description is based on a male from southern Tunisia in 1965 [94]; later, it was reported in Algeria in 1970 [80] then in Morocco in 1975 [95]. The first female was described in Tunisia in 2006 [57] and in 2011 in Algeria (Fig 37) [32]. So far, this species has been not recorded in Libya. Morphologically it is close to Ph. ariasi, but males have shorter aedeagus and higher number of coxite hairs (Fig 38). It occurs between the humid and hyperarid bioclimatic zones (Fig 39).

Fig 37

Phlebotomus chadlii ♀ [60].

Spermathecae and the reservoir at the subterminal part of the duct.

Fig 38

Phlebotomus chadlii ♂ [36,49].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Aedeagus shape.

Fig 39

Distribution of Phlebotomus chadlii.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-3-6 Phlebotomus langeroni, Nitzulescu, 1930

This species was found naturally infected by L. infantum in Tunisia [96,97] and shown to transmit L. infantum MON-98 under laboratory conditions [98]. The male is recognized by a long and bevel-shaped aedeagus at the tip (Fig 40). Female spermathecae have middle segments larger than the end segments and long slender neck with apical knob (Fig 41). Distal part of spermiducts is swollen but differs in shape from Ph. ariasi. Described first as a subspecies of Ph. perniciosus, based on males collected in Tunisia, then in 1930, Nitzulescu arose it to the species level [99]. In 2005, the first female specimen was also described in Tunisia [100]. It occurs from humid to arid bioclimatic zones (Fig 42).

Fig 40

Phlebotomus langeroni ♂ [36,44].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Genitalia pump. (C) Different reported aedeagus.

Fig 41

Phlebotomus langeroni ♀ [44].

(A, B) Pharynx. (C, D) Spermathecea and the reservoir at the subterminal part of the duct.

Fig 42

Distribution of Phlebotomus langeroni.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-3-7 Phlebotomus mariae, Rioux, Croset, Léger et Bailly-Choumara, 1974

One of the most elusive Larroussius species, described based only on males and considered to be closely related with Ph. ariasi [101]. Aedeagus are long, narrow with subparallel edges and very discreetly swelling at the end tip (Fig 43). So far, it was recorded only in few localities of Morocco from subhumid to subarid bioclimatic zones (Fig 44). Females of this species remain unknown [25,101,102].

Fig 43

Phlebotomus mariae ♂ [28].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Pharynx. (C) Aedeagus.

Fig 44

Distribution of Phlebotomus mariae.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

I-4 Subgenus Transphlebotomus Artemiev 1984

The subgenus Transphlebotomus was established by Artemiev in 1984 based on the male genital morphology and female characters for spermathecae and pharyngeal armature [103]. The species belonging to this genus are defined by individual spermathecal ducts being broad, joining at genital opening; spermathecae are simple striated tubes, not clearly demarcated into segments, with a small head and pharyngeal teeth point forward [59]. Of 5 species so far described in the Mediterranean region, some of these notably recently [104,105], only 1 has been recorded in Maghreb region. Due to minor morphological differences between species, morphological identifications of Transphlebotomus should be confirmed by molecular methods.

I-4-1 Phlebotomus mascittii, Grassi, 1908

Suspected but so far not proven vector of L. infantum due to circumstantial findings of parasite DNA by PCR screening [106]. This species (Figs 45 and 46) exhibits a wide distribution in Europe that extends the usual Mediterranean regions to the north up to Austria, Germany, and Slovakia [107-109]. In the Maghreb region, its presence was recorded by a sole finding of 1 female in Tizi Ouzou, Algeria (Fig 47) in the humid bioclimatic zone [32].

Fig 45

Phlebotomus mascitti ♀ [53].

A) Pharynx, B) Spermathecae.

Fig 46

Phlebotomus mascitti ♂ [50].

General genitalia.

Fig 47

Distribution of Phlebotomus mascittii.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

II- Genus Sergentomyia França and Parrot 1920

In Maghreb region, the genus Sergentomyia is represented by species of 4 subgenera described below (Sergentomyia, Parrotomyia, Grassomyia, and Sintonius), and the fifth subgenus Parvidens is present only in Mauritania. They are all defined by (i) cibarial teeth and/or denticles (more developed in females than in males and arranged in a transverse row); (ii) a pigmented patch on the dorsal wall of cibarium; and (iii) the hind end of abdomen tergites 2 to 6 bear all or most setae recumbent arising from small sockets as compared with large round sockets on first tergite. Males possess (i) a single paramere; and (ii) style with 4 terminal spines (sometime arranged as 2 terminal and 2 subterminal) and a short nondeciduous seta (accessory spine). Females spermathecae are smooth or segmented, either tubular or capsuliform [2,110]. The main differences between the species are summarized in Tables D and E in S1 Text for males and females, respectively.

Unlike genus Phlebotomus, none of the Sergentomyia species was conclusively proven to be a vector of Leishmania parasites that infect humans. However, for a number of species, including some that are also recorded in the Maghreb region, circumstantial evidence based on microscopic observations and/or PCR detection of parasite’s DNA suggest that they may be also play a role in Leishmania transmission. Such information is therefore mentioned for respective species listed below.

II-1 Subgenus Sergentomyia

Females of this subgenus have tubular spermathecae with smooth walls of uniform width along their length, antennal segment 3 is shorter than segments 4 and 5 together and usually shorter than labrum. Males have a stout finger-like aedeagus with blunt tip [59]. So far, 5 species were reported in the Maghreb region.

II-1-1 Sergentomyia minuta parroti, Adler et Theodor, 1927

Sergentomyia minuta parroti was reported to transmit L. tarentolae that infects geckoes [111,112]. Females are recognized by presence of net pigmented patch upon the straight row of cibarial teeth (Fig 48). In males, accessory spine is located in the middle of the style (Fig 49). It is an herpetophilic species found in the whole Maghreb region (Fig 50) from the humid to arid bioclimatic zones [2]. Two subspecies were described, Se. minuta minuta (Fig 48A) and Se. minuta parroti (Fig 48B), which differ in the number of cibarial teeth: around 40 for Se. minuta minuta and over 70 for Se. minuta parroti [111].

Fig 48

Sergentomyia minuta ♀ [44].

A) Cibarium of Se. minuta minuta, B) Cibarium of Se. minuta parroti, C) Pharynx, D) Spermathecae.

Fig 49

Sergentomyia minuta ♂ [44].

A) General genitalia, B) Aedeagus, C) Insertion position of nondeciduous seta.

Fig 50

Distribution of Sergentomyia minuta.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

II- 1–2 Sergentomyia fallax, Parrot, 1921

Females are recognized by strongly distended posterior heart-shaped part of pharynx and the presence of 16 to 18 sharped cibarial teeth aligned on concave shape and oval or rounded pigmented patch (Fig 51). Male style is 4 times longer than wide, with accessory spine in close to distal end (Fig 52) [33]. It occurs in the whole Maghreb region in all bioclimatic zones (Fig 53).

Fig 51

Sergentomyia fallax ♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx and Cibarium. (B) Third and fourth antenna segments. (C) Spermathecae.

Fig 52

Sergentomyia fallax ♂ [44].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Genitalia pump. (C) Insertion of accessory spine.

Fig 53

Distribution of Sergentomyia fallax.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

II-1-3 Sergentomyia antennata, Newstead, 1912

This species was demonstrated to be also mammaliophilic, feeding on rodents as well as reptiles [33]. Male genitalia are similar to those of Se. minuta, but the accessory spine is located near the 4 spines (Fig 54). Female possesses 23 to 34 sharped cibarial teeth aligned on a concave shape and triangular pigmented patch (Fig 55). The pharynx has a distended posterior part heart-shaped less marked than Se. fallax. Sergentomyia antennata also occurs in the whole Maghreb region in all bioclimatic zones (Fig 56).

Fig 54

Sergentomyia antennata ♂ [44].

General genitalia.

Fig 55

Sergentomyia antennata♀ [2].

(A, B) Third and fourth antenna segments. (C, D) Third and fourth antenna segments. (E) Pharynx. (F) 2 different aspect of the cibarium. (G) Spermathecae.

Fig 56

Distribution of Sergentomyia antennata.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

II-1-4 Sergentomyia cincta Parrot and Martin 1948

Its morphology is similar to Se. antennata. Males are difficult to distinguish but females have only 12 to 18 cibarial teeth (Fig 57) [2]. It is found in the hyperarid bioclimatic zone and reported only in Iherir an Oasis of Algeria (Fig 58). Lewis and Büttiker considered it as synonymous of Se. antennata [33].

Fig 57

Sergentomyia cincta♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx. (B, C) Third and fourth antenna segments. (D) cibarium.

Fig 58

Distribution of Sergentomyia cincta.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

II-1-5 Sergentomyia schwetzi, Adler, Theodor et Parrot, 1929

Typical species belongs to the Ethiopian region. Females possess 13 to 20 strong and sharped cibarial teeth aligned on concave shape with pigment patch large in middle (Fig 59). The pharynx has a narrow and strong-armed posterior part (lamp glass shaped). In males, the style holds 4 distal spines arranged in 2 well-separated groups and accessory spine on the distal 1/3. The short and sharped cibarial teeth are arranged in 2 rows, 15 to 20 and 10 to 15, respectively (Fig 60). It was reported only in Algeria and Libya [31,113,114] from subarid to hyperarid bioclimatic zones (Fig 61).

Fig 59

Sergentomyia schwetzi ♀ [2].

(A) Different cibarium shapes. (B) Pharynx. (C) Spermathecae. (D) Atypical form of the abdomen. (E) Typical form of the abdomen.

Fig 60

Sergentomyia schwetzi ♂ [2,44].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Different cibarial forms. (C) Pharynx.

Fig 61

Distribution of Sergentomyia schwetzi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

II-2 Subgenus Parrotomyia

Females have cibarium with comb-like row of strong parallel teeth and pharynx narrowing posteriorly (lamp glass shape). The spermathecae have a form of smooth spherical or ellipsoid capsule. Aedeagus is long, slender, triangular, and narrowing gradually to a sharp point, and paramere is hooked [59]. Three species were reported in the Maghreb region.

II-2-1 Sergentomyia africana subsp. asiatica, Newstead, 1912

This species, also known as Se. africana var. cherifiensis, is distributed in the Ethiopian region, and only 1 female has been reported from Morocco (Fig 62) in the hyperarid bioclimatic zone [24,115]. The spermathecae have an elongated capsule shape; females have 40 to 48 cibarial teeth aligned in a palisade line, 15 punctiform denticules and headband pigmented patch, and their pharynx is long and thread- ike (Fig 63).

Fig 62

Distribution of Sergentomyia africana subsp. asiatica.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 63

Sergentomyia africana subsp asiatica ♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx and cibarium. (B) Third and fourth antenna segments. (C) Spermathecae.

II-2-2 Sergentomyia africana subsp. eremitis, Parrot et De Jolinière, 1945

Another species of the Ethiopian region [2]. Until now, it was reported only in Algeria (Fig 64) in the hyperarid bioclimatic zone [52]. Male has 30 to 35 cibarial teeth and 8 to 10 denticules disposed on a concave-shape line (Fig 65). Female spermathecae have an elongated capsule shape, 60 to 65 long cibarial teeth aligned on concave-shaped line and 12 punctiform denticules with a mushroom-shaped pigmented patch (Fig 66) [52].

Fig 64

Distribution of Sergentomyia africana subsp eremitis.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 65

Sergentomyia africana subsp eremitis ♂ [54].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Genital pump.

Fig 66

Sergentomyia africana subsp eremitis ♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx and cibarium. (B) Third and fourth antenna segments. (C) Spermathecae.

II-2-3 Sergentomyia lewisi Parrot, 1948

This species has been reported in Morocco, Algeria, and, recently, in Tunisia [24,38,53] from subarid to hyper arid bioclimatic zones (Fig 67). The females are recognized by the spermathecae with a poppy capsule shape, 15 to 20 strong and sharped cibarial teeth aligned on concave line, 16 to 20 denticules, and mushroom-shaped pigmented patch (Fig 68). Male has 8 to 12 cibarial teeth disposed on a posterior concave line and 8 to 14 denticules (Fig 69) [2].

Fig 67

Distribution of Sergentomyia lewisi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer

Fig 68

Sergentomyia lewisi ♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx and Cibarium. (B) Pigmentation of the patch. (C) Spermathecae.

Fig 69

Sergentomyia lewisi ♂ [2,57].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Genitalia pump without pavilion. (C) Cibarium.

II-3 Subgenus Grassomyia

Females of this subgenus have spermathecae in form of round, sclerotized capsules with small spicules and their antenna segment 3 lacks ascoids. Females possess cibarial teeth in distinct convex row. Males have simple parameres (not bifid). Species of this subgenus are often associated with vegetation close to water sources and feed on reptiles and amphibians [59,116]. Only a single species is reported in the Maghreb region.

II-3-1 Sergentomyia dreyfussi Parrot, 1933

This species is reported in the whole Maghreb region (Fig 70) from arid to hyperarid bioclimatic zones [37,41,51]. Males have a style with 4 strong terminal spines, accessory spine located close to them, strong and triangular (conical) aedeagus, 20 separated cibarial teeth, and presence of spines on the femur of the first leg (Fig 71). The females possess characteristic rounded spermathecae covered by thin spicules (Fig 72) [51].

Fig 70

Distribution of Sergentomyia dreyfussi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 71

Sergentomyia dreyfussi ♂ [54].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Pharynx. (C) Cibarium. (D) Third antenna segment. (E) Genitalia pump.

Fig 72

Sergentomyia dreyfussi ♀ [2].

(A, B) Femurs of Moroccan and Algerian specimens. (C) Pharynx and Cibarium. (D) Meteplsternum. (E) Spermathecae.

II-4 Subgenus Sintonius

Species with scanty erect hairs on the dorsal aspects of segments II to VI in females with segmented or crenulated spermathecae shaped similarly to subgenus Phlebotomus. Males have a pointed aedeagus and hooked intermediate appendage, [2,117]. Four species are reported from the Maghreb region.

II-4-1 Sergentomyia clydei Sinton, 1928

This species was reported to transmit Sauroleishmania sp. and DNA of L. major was recently detected in specimens from Tunisia [118]. This species is reported in the whole Maghreb region (Fig 73) from arid to hyperarid bioclimatic zones [37,41,119]. The males are recognized by the presence of 4 strong spines, 2 apical and 2 subapical, and an accessory spine on the distal 1/3, 2 to 3 strong teeth and 25 to 35 denticules. The aedeagus is short, conical, and pointed (Fig 74). This species is closely related to Se. christophersi, which differs only in the denticules number [119]. In the females, the spermathecae have 7 or 8 segments. The cibarium includes 2 rows of teeth, 13 long and sharped and 18 short and blunt with a diamond pigmented patch (Fig 75) [2].

Fig 73

Distribution of Sergentomyia clydei.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer

Fig 74

Sergentomyia clydei ♂ [2].

General genitalia.

Fig 75

Sergentomyia clydei ♀ [2].

(A) Cibarium. (B) Third and fourth antenna segments. (C) Spermathecae.

II-4-2 Sergentomyia christophersi Sinton, 1927

Originally described from Pakistan by Sinton [120], this species has been reported first in Tunisia in 1971. It occurs in all Maghreb region (Fig 76) between the arid and hyperarid bioclimatic zones [33,45,95,121]. The males are similar to Se. clydei except the number of denticules that equals to 05 (Fig 77). In females, the spermathecae have 8 segments, 4 to 7 sharped and pointed cibarial teeth, 4 to 5 denticules, and small triangular pigmented patch (Fig 78) [2].

Fig 76

Distribution of Sergentomyia christophersi.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 77

Sergentomyia christophersi ♂ [2,48].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Genital pump. (C) Insertion position of accessory spine.

Fig 78

Sergentomyia christophersi ♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx. (B–D) Cibarium Guinean specimens. (E) Cibarium Tibetan specimen. (F) Third and fourth antenna segments, Guinean specimen. (G) Third and fourth antenna segments, Tibetan specimen. (H) Spermathecae, Tibetan specimen. (I) Spermathecae Guinean specimen.

II-4-3 Sergentomyia hirtus Parrot et de Jolinière, 1945

This species was described based on a single male captured in In-Amguel (Tamanrasset) in Algeria in the hyperarid bioclimatic zone (Fig 79). Its style holds 7 strong spines (3 submedians, 2 subapical, and 2 apical) and an accessory spine. The aedeagus is very short (18 μm) and subconical (Fig 80). The females remain unknown [52]. Dedet and colleagues [33] challenged the validity of the species since it was not reported from elsewhere and could be just a malformation often reported in Sergentomyia species.

Fig 79

Distribution of Sergentomyia hirtus.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 80

Sergentomyia hirtus ♂ [55].

(A) General genitalia. (B) Fourth antenna segment. (C) Cibarium. (D) Aedeagus. (E) Style. (F) Genitalia pump.

II-4-4 Sergentomyia tiberiadis Adler, Theodor, and Lourie, 1930

This species was reported only in the Central Sahara of Algeria where the hyper arid bioclimatic zone occurs (Fig 81). Previously, it was named as Se. near clydei before considering it as a new species [122]. The males have a long, slender, and pointed end aedeagus without subapical tubercle, 12 to 14 pointed cibarial teeth standing almost in straight line and about 15 punctiform denticules arranged in a zigzag pattern (Fig 82). In females, the spermathecae comprise 6 to 8 segments, narrowing toward the apex, 16 to 17 wide and pointing upward cibarial teeth arranged in a line slightly convex interiorly, and about 10 to 15 punctiform denticules arranged in zigzag row. The pharynx seems completely unarmed (Fig 83) [2,122].

Fig 81

Distribution of Sergentomyia tiberiadis.

Available from: https://services3.arcgis.com/W1gaXmEpGR8h1K59/arcgis/rest/services/maghreb/FeatureServer.

Fig 82

Sergentomyia tiberiadis ♂ [2].

(A) Pharynx and Cibarium. (B) General genitalia.

Fig 83

Sergentomyia tiberiadis ♀ [2].

(A) Pharynx and cibarium. (B) Spermathecae.

Discussion

Our study reviews the presence of sand fly species in Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya countries where sand fly fauna is known to be very diverse, and many species are incriminated in the transmission of sand fly–borne pathogens as arboviruses of the Phlebovirus group [123] and most importantly parasitic protozoa of the genus Leishmania. We decided to exclude Mauritania from the analyses because accurate data regarding the distribution of sand fly species and the incidence of CL and VL are unavailable. To our best knowledge, we summarize all sand fly species recorded in the Maghreb region for the first time. We also update the information concerning their vector role in transmission of diseases, morphological characters important for species identification and their biology.

The first sand fly species reported from North Africa was Ph. papatasi in 1908 [124]. Since then, a plethora of studies reported presence of so far 32 sand fly species, 16 species of the genus Phlebotomus and 16 species of the genus Sergentomyia. The genus Phlebotomus is represented by 4 subgenera, namely Larroussius, Phlebotomus, Paraphlebotomus, and Transphlebotomus and the genus Sergentomyia comprises 5 subgenera, namely Sergentomyia, Parrotomyia, Grassomyia, Sintonius, and Parvidens, species of the last one recorded only in Mauritania. The importance of the Maghreb region for sand fly research is highlighted by the fact that within the 32 species recorded here, 13 species were first described in one of the Maghreb region countries [116]: male of Ph. sergenti Parrot, 1917 [125], male of Se. fallax Parrot, 1921, male of Ph. perfiliewi Parrot, 1930, male of Ph. langeroni Nitzulescu, 1930 [99], male and female of Ph. longicuspis Nitzulescu, 1930 [126], male and female of Se. dreyfussi Parrot, 1933, male and female of Ph. bergeroti Parrot, 1934, male and female of Se. eremitis Parrot et De Jolinière, 1945 [52], male of Se. hirtus Parrot et de Jolinière, 1945 [52], male of Ph. chadlii Rioux, Juminer et Gibily, 1966 [94], male of Ph. chabaudi Croset, Abonnenc, and Rioux, 1970 [55], male of Ph. mariae Rioux, Croset, Léger et Bailly-Choumara, 1974 [25] and finally, male and female of Ph. riouxi Depaquit, Léger, and Killick-kendrick, 1998 [48].

The 4 reviewed countries within the region share some ubiquitous sand fly species, namely Ph. papatasi, Ph. bergeroti, Ph. perniciosus, Ph. longicuspis, Ph. langeroni, Ph. sergenti, Ph. alexandri, Ph. chabaudi, Se. antennata, Se. christophersi, Se. clydei, Se. fallax, Se. dreyfussi, Se. minuta, and Se. schwetzi. Algeria and Morocco have a record of 24 and 23 species, respectively [15,27,32,127]. Several rare species were reported only in Algeria: Ph. mascittii, Se. africana subsp eremites, Se. tiberiadis, and Se. hirtus [32,33,52], whereas Ph. mariae and Se. africana subsp. asiatica were reported only from Morocco [24,25]. Tunisia is ranked at third place with 18 species so far [38]. For Libya, we are inclined to count 15 species, excluding 6 other species reported without any morphological evidence: Ph. orientalis, Ph. tobbi, Se. bedfordi, Se. cineta, Se. adleri, and Se. palestiniensis [113]. Record of these species was later considered as not sufficiently proven [41,121]. So far, the proven vectors of Leishmania parasite reported in Libya are Ph. papatasi, Ph. perniciosus, Ph. langeroni, Ph. perfiliewi, and Ph. sergenti [69]. Interestingly, the study carried out in Libya [41] provides illustration of some male specimens identified as Larroussius sp. that in our opinion displayed an aedeagus with curved tip characteristic of Ph. perniciosus atypical form; unfortunately, the author passed beside the right identification despite that the atypical forms were clearly described in Spain and Morocco since 1991 and 1998, respectively [83,128]. The studies considering the atypical forms of Ph. perniciosus were focused mostly on its molecular and morphological characterization and how to discriminate it from Ph. longicuspis [30,83,128-130]. So far, this species was reported in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia trapped in sympatric with Ph. longicuspis and Ph. perniciosus [30,83,84]. By contrast, relatively little is so far known about its ecology, host preferences, behavior, and vectorial capacity. These important aspects shall be addressed in future research in order to understand better its potential in the transmission of VL. In Mauritania, 10 sand fly species were historically reported: Ph. bergeroti, Ph. duboscqi, Se. dubia, Se. africana africana, Se. antennata, Se. schwetzi, Se. leslyae, Se. magna, and Se. freetownensis [2,116,131]. However, as these data stem exclusively from general keys and catalogs and no results of dedicated entomological surveys are available from this country, we cannot evaluate its sand fly fauna in more details. The update of this scant knowledge is much desired as 6 of the 10 Mauritanian species (Ph. duboscqi, Se. dubia, Se. africana africana, Se. lesleyae, Se. magna, and Se. freetownensis) were not reported from any other Maghreb country.

It is important to note that the current known distributions of sand fly species within the Maghreb region are not static but rather prone to dynamic changes. The countries share the same climatic conditions and landscape environments in large borderland areas, allowing the exchange of species either naturally or via human activities such as trade (e.g., cattle manure for the soil fertilization) and movement of the populations due to the drought or political crises across the Maghreb and north of the Sahel region. These factors may contribute to a potentially rapid spread of both pathogens and their vectors. Moreover, ongoing climate change may further facilitate the adaptation of arthropods and emergence of arthropod-borne pathogens in new areas [132]; this hypothesis can be supported by the occurrence of Anopheles gambiae, a primary vector of malaria in Africa, in the Algerian territory at the Malian border [133], although this species was originally not expected to be able to cross the Saharan band of the Sahel region. Sand fly distribution is known to be impacted by the climatic conditions mainly temperature and humidity. Under the scenarios of a prediction model assessing the impact of potential climate change on the distribution of sand fly populations, expected rising temperatures may allow the expansion of sand fly populations into environmentally suitable areas north off the current Mediterranean distribution [134]. Based on recent climate change predictions, North Africa region is expected to become more arid by 2100 when only the coastal parts will retain their semihumid bioclimatic zone [135]. Subsequently, some species such as Ph. papatasi, Ph. alexandri, Ph. sergenti and Ph. ariasi, while gaining more new areas by their northward expansion into currently nonendemic regions of Europe, may disappear from some regions in North Africa [136]. Such scenarios allow us to expect some species from the arid part expanding further north of their current distribution, possibly contributing to enhance transmission of various pathogens.

As already described, both cutaneous and visceral leishmaniases constitute one of major public health problems in the Maghreb region: While they were historically established here, recently, these diseases show a significant rise through many local outbreaks and thousands of new human cases annually. This is partially facilitated by abundant sand fly fauna as in each country, several proven and/or suspected sand fly vectors are present: Ph. papatasi transmitting L. major, Ph. perniciosus, and Ph. perfiliewi transmitting L. infantum, Ph. sergenti transmitting L. tropica and Ph. longicuspis, which is suspected to transmit L. infantum [21]. It is important to note that while firm criteria for rigorous incrimination of a sand fly species as a vector were set [1], these are often difficult to meet for practical and logistical reasons. The increasing availability of molecular methods of pathogen detection in sand fly vectors lead to widespread use of these techniques in the screening of field-caught specimens for Leishmania detection, this including a majority of studies in Maghreb. However, such findings shall be considered with caution as a detection of Leishmania DNA does not prove the role of analyzed sand fly species in its transmission. Typically, species of the genus Sergentomyia were often suspected to be incriminated in the transmission of Leishmania sp. based on circumstantial evidence [114]. Thus, it is important to determine the potential vectorial role of certain species especially in the central Sahara where Sergentomyia species are more abundant than species of the genus Phlebotomus [110]. Despite it was demonstrated that Se. schwetzi did not support the development of Leishmania parasites (including L. major and L. infantum) under laboratory conditions [137], such experimental assessment of Sergentomyia species remains rare and should deserve more attention in the future studies.

Several arboviruses of the order Bunyaviridae were reported from the Maghreb countries, including well-characterized TOSV, which is of most importance as it infects humans and was determined as a causative agent in a human case in Tunisia [138], Naples virus and Sicilian virus. However, despite the fact that these 3 sand fly–borne viruses known from other parts of the Mediterranean pose a potential human health risk, they remain understudied compared to leishmaniases: A recent literature review reported that of all publications on TOSV, only 8 refer to Algeria, 4 to Morocco, and 13 to Tunisia, while no data are available from Libya and Mauritania [139]. This contrasts with the expectation that these viruses may in fact be very prevalent in the region. High rates of TOSV-neutralizing antibodies reported from studies performed on humans or domestic animals in Algeria [87,93,140] and Tunisia [141,142] suggest frequent circulation of the virus in the region; in fact, some of human seroprevalence studies demonstrated percentage of human population that possess neutralizing antibodies against TOSV to be 2 to 3 times higher than in southern Europe [143]. The 3 abovementioned phleboviruses were detected in sand fly species of several subgenera in the Maghreb region as summarized in Table 1: TOSV in Ph. papatasi [64], Ph. sergenti [73], Ph. perniciosus [82], and Ph. longicuspis [73], Naples viruses in Ph. perniciosus and Ph. longicuspis [82,87], and Sicilian virus in Ph. ariasi [93]. This list is far from being exhaustive, and it is expected that other sand fly species, especially of the subgenus Larroussius, may be incriminated in circulation of these viruses [144]. Some of these viruses were detected in other sand fly species in neighboring countries, for example, Sicilian virus in Ph. papatasi in Egypt [63]. Sometimes, a virus is detected in pooled sand flies without their exact species identification, relying on parallel morphological identification of a subset of sand fly catch to estimate the relative abundance of each sand fly species; this was the case of TOSV detection in Algeria with 6 sand fly species known to occur in the focus [145] and in Tunisia where Ph. perniciosus was the most abundant species [146]. NGS and statistical analysis of the subsequent reads would enable species identification within pooled samples; however, such analysis is not always available. The diversity of phleboviruses in the Maghreb region is still not fully understood, and several novel viruses were detected or isolated from sand flies, such as Punique virus [82] and Saddaguia virus [147] detected in sand flies in Tunisia. To determine the involvement of different sand fly species in their transmission remains one of the future research tasks.

While species identification based on a detailed analysis of decisive morphological features remains a golden standard in sand fly taxonomy, the advent of molecular methods in last decades allowed it to be complemented by several other approaches. DNA-based techniques targeting various genetic markers such as Cytochrome b (Cytb), Cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI), and Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) regions allowed further insight into sand fly taxonomy, revealing the presence of Ph. perniciosus atypical form so long confused with Ph. longicuspis, a closely related species [129,130], boosting morphological identification criteria proposed for the couple Ph. chabaudi/Ph. riouxi, 2 closely related and morphologically challenging species [15,48]. In another study assessing the status of Se. minuta populations from different parts of the Mediterranean Basin, the analysis of COI and Cytb sequences allowed to reveal the presence of a complex genetic structure including 2 subpopulations Se. minuta minuta in Europe and Se. minuta parroti in North Africa [148]. Moreover, molecular techniques proved useful for species identification of pooled sand fly specimens in studies aiming to detect arboviruses where NGS analysis and statistical analysis of the subsequent reads was used to help species identification within pooled samples [149-151]. Recently, protein-based method of MALDI-TOF, which allows a rapid and cost-effective species identification of sand flies [152], was successfully implemented in sand fly surveys in Algeria and Morocco [153,154]. Both DNA and protein-targeting molecular methods were successfully combined with morphological analysis in other geographical regions [155,156] and may be applied in the Maghreb countries to resolve taxonomical issues such as species status confirmation of Se. hirtus or Se. africana subsp. eremites and Se. africana subsp. asiatica, which were considered as synonymous [157]. In this respect, updated and detailed knowledge of the sand fly fauna as summarized in this study may be a valuable background for further studies.

In conclusion, this review summarizes the sand fly fauna occurring in the Maghreb region, compiling the distribution maps of each species based on published findings, discussing the suspected or proven role of each species in the transmission of pathogens, providing species-specific morphological features for the species identification, and highlighting the gaps to be filled regarding the vectorial status and presence of some sand fly species, pointing out a complete absence of recent data from Mauritania and fragmented knowledge of sand fly fauna in Libya, a country suffering a prolonged political unrest that disrupted healthcare system and sand fly control programs.

Leishmaniases remain a major public health problem in the Maghreb region.

Current gaps of knowledge highlight the necessity to establish or strengthen the entomological networks to study sand fly fauna, species distribution, and their involvement in transmission of pathogens in the Maghreb region.

Sand fly–borne viruses and the diseases they may cause deserve more attention in this region where different phleboviruses were reported.

There is an urgent need to fulfill the data gaps concerning leishmaniases and the sand fly vectors in Mauritania.

Taxonomy of several sand fly species shall be addressed by integrating both morphological and molecular approaches and implementing sustained field research.

Maroli M, Feliciangeli MD, Bichaud L, Charrel RN, Gradoni L. Phlebotomine sandflies and the spreading of leishmaniases and other diseases of public health concern. Med Vet Entomol. 2013;27(2):123–47.

Alvar J, Vélez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, Cano J, et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):35671. Available from: www.plosone.org

Swynghedauw B, Weméau JL. Consequences of climate change on human and animal health. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2021;205:219–26.

Dvorak V, Halada P, Hlavackova K, Dokianakis E, Antoniou M, Volf P. Identification of phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jan 14;7(1).

Depaquit J. Molecular systematics applied to Phlebotomine sandflies: Review and perspectives. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;28:744–56. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.10.027

Geographic location of sand fly species in Maghreb region.

(XLS)

Click here for additional data file.

Main differences between Phlebotomus and Sergentomyia species.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.