| Literature DB >> 30092826 |
Bilel Chalghaf1,2,3, Jomâa Chemkhi4, Benjamin Mayala5, Myriam Harrabi4, Goze Bertin Benie6, Edwin Michael5, Afif Ben Salah4,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to climate change, the geographical distribution of sand flies during the last decades has shifted northward from latitudes below 45°N in southern Europe to latitudes just above 50○N. Recent studies show that some phlebotomine sand flies were recorded in several parts of Germany and Belgium. In central Europe, some autochthone leishmaniasis cases are being recorded in regions traditionally regarded as leishmaniasis-free. An important challenge is to predict the geographical distribution of leishmaniasis vectors under new climatic conditions. In this study, we attempted to predict the current distribution of six leishmaniasis vectors in the Mediterranean basin and forecast species' geographical shift under future climate scenarios using an ensemble ecological niche modeling approach. Species records were obtained from scientific surveys published in the research literature between 2006 and 2016. A series of climate metrics describing temperature and precipitation in the study area under two climatic scenarios were obtained from WorldClim database. A consensus model was derived from six varieties of modeling approaches (regression, machine learning and classification techniques) in order to ensure valid prediction of distribution of vectors under different climate scenarios.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; Geographical distribution; Leishmaniasis; Modeling; Vectors
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30092826 PMCID: PMC6085715 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-018-3019-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Percent contribution of environmental variables for the final model fitting. Abbreviations: Bio5, maximum temperature of warmest month; Bio6, minimum temperature of coldest month; Bio16, precipitation of wettest quarter; Bio17, precipitation of driest quarter
Fig. 2Geographical distribution of Plebotomus papatasi and Plebotomus alexandri under the pessimistic climate change scenario A2a and the optimistic climate change scenario B2a for the three time periods (2020, 2050 and 2080). Gray color indicates areas predicted to be stable for the species absence, orange color indicates areas to be gained by the species, green color indicates areas to be lost by the species and red color indicates areas to be stable for the species presence
Fig. 3Geographical distribution of Plebotomus ariasi and Plebotomus sergenti under the pessimistic climate change scenario A2a and the optimistic climate change scenario B2a for the three time periods (2020, 2050 and 2080). Gray color indicates areas predicted to be stable for the species absence, orange color indicates areas to be gained by the species, green color indicates areas to be lost by the species and red color indicates areas to be stable for the species presence
Centroid shift, shift direction, conserved area, lost area and gained area in the Mediterranean basin for the different studied phlebotomine species for the three reference years (2020, 2050 and 2080) under the pessimistic scenario A2a and the optimistic scenario B2a
| Centroid shift (km)a | Shift direction (°) | Conserved area (%) | Lost area (%)b | Gained area (%) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 2050 | 2080 | 2020 | 2050 | 2080 | 2020 | 2050 | 2080 | 2020 | 2050 | 2080 | 2020 | 2050 | 2080 | |
| Scenario A2a | |||||||||||||||
| | 292 | 595 | 948 | 17 | 14 | 359 | 84.1 | 72.5 | 49.3 | -16.0 | -27.5 | -50.7 | 21.8 | 45.2 | 63.6 |
| | 341 | 483 | 484 | 232 | 231 | 231 | 90.5 | 87.0 | 86.1 | -9.5 | -13.0 | -13.9 | 4.9 | 9.1 | 12.8 |
| | 408 | 1019 | 1279 | 67 | 71 | 75 | 83.4 | 71.2 | 62.5 | -16.7 | -28.8 | -37.6 | 29.7 | 69.4 | 90.5 |
| | 88 | 290 | 255 | 211 | 235 | 211 | 75.3 | 56.8 | 41.3 | -14.7 | -43.2 | -58.7 | 35.2 | 51.8 | 68.1 |
| Scenario B2a | |||||||||||||||
| | 298 | 460 | 728 | 358 | 5 | 13 | 83.8 | 77.1 | 67.9 | -16.3 | -22.9 | -32.1 | 24.5 | 32.9 | 47.1 |
| | 304 | 401 | 533 | 233 | 233 | 233 | 91.4 | 88.8 | 85.8 | -8.6 | -11.2 | -14.2 | 5.8 | 7.4 | 10.1 |
| | 298 | 524 | 1150 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 82.0 | 76.6 | 71.3 | -18.1 | 23.4 | -28.7 | 26.8 | 37.5 | 80.3 |
| | 67 | 15 | 155 | 184 | 152 | 233 | 74.4 | 67.5 | 58.6 | -25.6 | -32.5 | -41.4 | 25.6 | 50.3 | 57.8 |
aThe centroid shift is the geodesic distance between the centroids of the present and the potential future specie ranges, the shift direction is the angle between North (0°) and the geodesic path between the present and the potential future centroids
bThe lost area is the percentage of area lost by the species in comparison to the current species range and the gained area is the percentage of area gained by the species in comparison to the current species range