| Literature DB >> 34983449 |
Umut Karaca1, Murat Kucukevcilioglu2, Ali Hakan Durukan2, Dorukcan Akincioglu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study aims to evaluate peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL-T), central macular thickness (MT), choroidal thickness (CT), and thickness of each retinal layer after automatic segmentation in patients who underwent retinal detachment (RD) repair with longstanding silicone oil tamponade.Entities:
Keywords: Choroid; Long-term effects; Optical coherence tomography; Retinal layers; Silicone oils
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34983449 PMCID: PMC8728934 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02239-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ophthalmol ISSN: 1471-2415 Impact factor: 2.209
Fig. 1Peripapillary choroidal thickness measurements. (ILM, internal limiting membrane; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; T, Temporal; TS; Superotemporal, TI; Inferotemporal N, Nasal; NS, Superonasal; NI, Inferonasal)
Fig. 2A representative figure of retinal layer division determined by the automated segmentation application of the Spectralis OCT. The segmentation software automatically marked the ten retinal layers (A: RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; ILM, internal limiting membrane; B: GCL, Ganglion cell layer; C: IPL, inner plexiform layer; D: INL, inner nuclear layer; E: OPL, Outer plexiform layer; F: ONL: Outer nuclear layer; G: PR, photoreceptors; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; H: BM, Bruch membrane; ELM, external limiting membrane)
Demographic and baseline characteristics of the subjects (SD: Standard deviation)
| Characteristics | Patients |
|---|---|
| 33 | |
| 62.05 ± 15.7 (20–89) | |
| 14/19 | |
| 10/23 | |
| 25/8 | |
| 15.1 ± 15.2 (7–70) | |
| 1.71 ± 0.96 | |
| 1.61 ± 0.95 |
Average RNFL and choroidal thickness values at different peripapillary locations (RNFL: Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer, CT: Choroidal Thickness)
| RNFL | CT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study eye | Control | Study eye | Control | |||
| 76.4 ± 12.4 | 86.3 ± 35.8 | 0.28 | 150.3 ± 63.0 | 167.5 ± 72.9 | 0.20 | |
| 101.3 ± 22.3 | 116.2 ± 50.6 | 0.22 | 141.7 ± 87.5 | 177.3 ± 85.1 | 0.17 | |
| 110.8 ± 47.3 | 123.7 ± 32.2 | 0.10 | 159.9 ± 68.2 | 182.6 ± 97.4 | 0.17 | |
| 67.5 ± 14.4 | 92.8 ± 37.0 | 0.03* | 159.8 ± 59.5 | 176.9 ± 81.6 | 0.15 | |
| 111.8 ± 42.5 | 129.9 ± 37.1 | 0.08 | 142.9 ± 64.9 | 164.5 ± 84.7 | 0.17 | |
| 99.6 ± 30.4 | 99.7 ± 42.0 | 0.99 | 121.0 ± 59.2 | 155.7 ± 86.6 | 0.06 | |
The thickness of retinal layers after segmentation
| Study eye | Control | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.5 ± 2.1 | 24.1 ± 4.0 | 0.01* | |
| 18.7 ± 3.2 | 37.0 ± 3.4 | 0.01* | |
| 23.2 ± 2.6 | 40.2 ± 3.2 | 0.01* | |
| 24.9 ± 3.1 | 40.6 ± 2.9 | 0.01* | |
| 31.3 ± 3.4 | 35.5 ± 2.5 | 0.08 | |
| 80.7 ± 7.7 | 83.3 ± 6.5 | 0.35 | |
| 16.6 ± 2.1 | 18.1 ± 1.7 | 0.08 |
Correlations between postoperative RNFL thinning and age, gender,silicone retention time
| Age | Gender | Silicone retention time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -,155 | ,55 | ,072 | ,78 | -,676 | ,003* | |
| ,020 | ,94 | -,048 | ,85 | -,512 | ,03* | |
| -,097 | ,71 | ,108 | ,67 | -,284 | ,27 | |
| ,229 | ,37 | -,433 | ,08 | -,055 | ,83 | |
| -,206 | ,42 | ,361 | ,15 | -,666 | ,004* | |
| ,253 | ,32 | -,144 | ,58 | -,645 | ,005* | |