| Literature DB >> 34981241 |
João R Inácio1,2, Sriraag Balaji Srinivasan3, Terrence D Ruddy4, Robert A deKemp4, Frank Rybicki5,6, Rob S Beanlands4, Benjamin J W Chow1,4, Girish Dwivedi7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography (82Rb PET) MPI is considered a noninvasive reference standard for the assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Our main goal was to compare the diagnostic performance of static rest/ vasodilator stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) to stress/ rest 82Rb PET-MPI for the identification of myocardial ischemia.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Ischemia; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Rubidium positron emission tomography
Year: 2022 PMID: 34981241 PMCID: PMC8724508 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-021-00118-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hybrid Imaging ISSN: 2510-3636
Fig. 1CT-MPI Protocol. After patient preparation and monitoring, non-contrast prospective ECG-triggered axial cardiac CT for calcium scoring was obtained. For CT-MPI, two consecutive rest/stress prospective ECG-triggered axial acquisitions were performed with a triphasic intravenous contrast medium injection protocol. After rest CT-MPI acquisition, a delay of at least 20 min to mitigate the effects of pre-medication with beta-blockers and nitroglycerine. Stress CT-MPI was acquired 2 min after completion of dipyridamole intravenous infusion. Once CT image acquisition was completed, intravenous aminophylline was administered to reverse the effects of dipyridamole
Fig. 2CT-MPI Rest-Stress visual analysis. CT-MPI in Rest (A–E) and Stress (F–J) in short axis, 2-chamber and 4-chamber multi-planar planes images with 5–7 mm slice thickness, display 200–300 HU window width and 100–150 HU window length. Perfusion defects on post dipyridamole stress CT-MPI in mid and apical anterior/anterolateral segments in a single patient (red arrows on G–J). The extent and severity of stress perfusion defect was scored as 1 for mid anterior segment, 2 mid anterolateral segment, 3 for apical anterior segment and 1 apical lateral segment. This corresponded to summed stress score of 7, summed rest score of 0 and sTPD 10%, iTPD 10%. TPD total perfusion deficit
Patients characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| 44 | |
| BMI | 30.8 (± 6.7) |
| Age | 61.7 (± 10.9) |
| Male/female | 23 (52)/21 (48) |
| Past medical history of CAD: | |
| Previous MI | 10 (23) |
| Previous PCI | 10 (23) |
| Previous CABG | 3 (7) |
| Smoking history | 33 (75) |
| Diabetes | 17 (39) |
| IDDM | 4 (9) |
| NIDDM | 13 (30) |
| Hypertension | 35 (80) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 36 (82) |
| Family History of CAD | 24 (55) |
| Asymptomatic | 9 (20) |
| New Chest Pain | |
| Typical | 10 (23) |
| Atypical | 12 (27) |
| Dyspnea | 26 (59) |
| Palpitations | 16 (36) |
| CCS class | |
| 0 | 18 (41) |
| 1 | 13(30) |
| 2 | 4(9) |
| 3 | 2(5) |
| 4 | 7(16) |
| NYHA Class | |
| 0 | 15(34) |
| 1 | 13(30) |
| 2 | 8(18) |
| 3 | 1(2) |
| 4 | 7(16) |
Quantitative variables expressed as mean and ± standard deviation; categorical variables expressed as frequencies (percentages)
BM, body mass index; CAD coronary artery disease; MI myocardial infarct; PCI percutaneous coronary intervention; CABG coronary artery bypass graft surgery; IDDM insulin dependent diabetes mellitus; NIDDM noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus; CCS Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading scale of angina; NYHA New York Heart Association functional classification
Studies characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Duration in days between CT-MPI and 82Rb-PET MPI | 20.3 (± 19.2) |
| Heart rate during rest CT-MPI (beats per minute) | 54.2 (± 6.7) |
| Range of heart rate during rest CT-MPI (beats per minute) | 39–67 |
| Maximum heart rate during stress CT-MPI (beats per minute) | 72.9 (± 8.9) |
| Range of heart rate during stress CT-MPI (beats per minute) | 58–100 |
| DLP of rest-stress CT-MPI, mGy/cm | 598.1 (± 149.8) |
| Total effective radiation dose rest-stress CT-MPI, mSv | 8.4 (± 2.1) |
| Total estimated effective radiation dose 82Rb-PET MPI, mSv | 2 |
Average ± standard deviation; Effective dose = Dose length product (DLP) × 0.014mSV/mGy·cm
CT-MPI computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging; Rb PET MPI Rubidium-positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging
Fig. 3Stress CT-MI and 82Rb-PET agreement by visual analysis. Post dipyridamole stress short-axis images of CT-MPI in (A, C) and 82Rb-PET (B, D). Perfusion defects on post dipyridamole stress CT-MPI in mid anterior segments and corresponding 82Rb-PET images in a single patient (red arrows). Note beam hardening artifacts in apical segments in CT images (open green arrows)
Diagnostic performance of CT-MPI on a per patient and per-territory analysis using 82Rb PET-MPI as the reference standard
| Per-patient | Per-territory | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | LCx | RCA | All-territories | ||
| Sensitivity | 88.9% [65.3–98.6] | 91.7% | 80% | 44.4% | 73.1% [52.2–88.4] |
| Specificity | 57.7% [36.9–76.7] | 56.3% | 74.4% | 62.9% | 65.1% [53.4–74.6] |
| Positive likelihood ratio | 2.1 [1.3–3.4] | 2.10 | 3.12 | 1.23 | 2.15 [1.5–3.1] |
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.19 [0.1–0.7] | 0.15 | 0.27 | 0.88 | 0.41 [0.2–0.8] |
| Positive predictive value | 59.26% [38.8–77.6] | 44% | 28.57% | 23.53% | 33.93% [21.8–47.8] |
| Negative predictive value | 88.2% [63.6–98.5] | 94.7% | 96.77% | 81.48% | 90.79% [82.6–96.4] |
| Accuracy | 70.5% | 65.6% | 75.0% | 59.1% | 67.7% |
| Area under the ROC curve | 0.73 [0.57–0.85] | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.69[0.60–0.77] |
CT-MPI computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging; Rb PET MPI Rubidium-positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging; LAD left descending coronary artery; LCx left circumflex coronary artery; RCA right coronary artery; ROC receive operating characteristic curve
Comparison of CT-MPI and 82Rb PET MPI
| CT-MPI | 82Rb-PET MPI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients with stress reversible perfusion defects (SDS > 0) | 26 | 18 | 0.135 |
| Summed Stress Score (SSS) | 7.4 ± 7.1 | 2.5 ± 3.5 | < 0.0001 |
| Summed Rest Score (SRS) | 1.6 ± 2.8 | 1.0 ± 2.3 | 0.105 |
| Summed Difference Score (SDS) | 5.8 ± 6.9 | 1.5 ± 2.3 | 0.0001 |
| Total Perfusion Deficit Stress (TPDs) | 10.9 ± 10.5 | 3.7 ± 5.2 | < 0.0001 |
| Total Perfusion Deficit Rest (TPDr) | 2.4 ± 4.0 | 1.4 ± 3.4 | 0.105 |
| Ischemic perfusion deficit (iTPD) | 8.5 ± 10.1 | 2.3 ± 3.4 | 0.0001 |
SSS, SRS, SDS, TPDs, TPDr, iTPD are expressed as average % ± standard deviation
CT-MPI computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging; Rb-PET Rubidium-positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging
Fig. 4Bland–Altman analysis using visually derived iTPD % demonstrated a mean bias of 6.4; standard deviation of differences: 9.33 and 95% limits of agreement between the two methods: − 12.08 and 24.98. Thus, CT-MPI derived iTPD % overestimated the PET iTPD % by 6.4% on average with the 95% limits as above. The dashed pink line represents the regression line of the differences between CT-MPI and PET iTPD% which shows a positive trend representing that the CT-MPI derived iTPD% overestimation increased with an increasing average of CT-MPI and PET iTPD%. CT computed tomography; MPI myocardial perfusion imaging; PET 82-Rubidium positron emission tomography; iTPD% ischemic total perfusion deficit % based on visual semi-quantitative methods
Fig. 5The Passing–Bablok method of comparison demonstrates a proportional bias between the two semi-quantitative visual methods of myocardial perfusion assessment (slope = 6.86, y-intercept = 0, n = 43). The blue solid line indicates the slope of CT-MPI iTPD% measurements plotted against the perfect-fit line (dotted red line, slope = 1). The dotted blue line shows the lower limit of the 95% CI which does not include the perfect-fit line and hence, the proportional bias. The proportional bias indicates that the CT-MPI derived iTPD% overestimation of 82Rb PET derived iTPD% progressively increases with an increase in perfusion abnormalities as identified by 82Rb PET. The CUSUM (cumulative summation) test shows that the observed data does not significantly deviate from a linear model (P = 0.53). CT-MPI computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging; Rb PET 82-Rubidium positron emission tomography; iTPD% ischemic total perfusion deficit % based on visual semi-quantitative methods
| Rest | Stress | LAD | LCx | RCA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No artifacts | 643 (86) | 545 (73) | < 000.1 | 717 (81) | 222(84) | 249(71) | 0.002 |
| Artifacts | 105 (14) | 203 (27) | < 000.1 | 163 (19) | 42(16) | 103(29) | 0.002 |
| Beam hardening | 60 (8) | 43 (6) | 0.08 | 39(4) | 9(3) | 55(16) | < 000.1 |
| Motion | 3(0) | 40(5) | < 000.1 | 24(3) | 7(3) | 12(3) | 0.56 |
| Step artifact | 30(4) | 41(5) | 0.18 | 47(5) | 10(4) | 14(4) | 0.25 |
| Noise | 12(2) | 79(11) | < 000.1 | 53(6) | 16(16) | 22(6) | 0.89 |
N = 17 segments × 44 studies = 748; number of findings (%)
LAD left descending coronary artery; LCx circumflex coronary artery; RCA right coronary artery
LAD (1,2,7,8,12,13–17 segments), LCx (5,6,11 segments), and RCA (3,4,9,10 segments) according to 17-segment model
p* Chi-squared test between Rest and Stress; P** Chi-squared test for trend between LAD, LCx and RCA