| Literature DB >> 34980148 |
Ling Mei1,2, Tao Wang2, Yueyue Chen1,2, Dongmei Wei1,2, Yueting Zhang1,2, Tao Cui1,2, Jian Meng1,2, Xiaoli Zhang2, Yuqing Liu2, Lisha Ding2, Xiaoyu Niu3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The status of vaginal microbiota in persistent high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) infection is unclear. The present work aimed to identify the vaginal microbiota of persistent HPV infection and explore the possible underlying microbiota factors.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; HPV clearance; HPV persistent infection; Vaginal microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34980148 PMCID: PMC8722078 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03201-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients
| Characteristics | P Group (N = 28) | C Group (N = 30) | NC Group (N = 42) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years, Mean ± SD) | 38.47 ± 7.37 | 38.86 ± 11.44 | 37.29 ± 7.49 | 0.76 |
| Gravity(n, Mean ± SD) | 1.68 ± 1.57 | 1.81 ± 1.60 | 1.48 ± 1.70 | 0.73 |
| Parity (n/%) | ||||
| ≤ 1 | 26/92.86 | 27/90 | 37/88.10 | 0.81 |
| ≥ 2 | 2/7.14 | 3/10 | 5/11.90 | |
| Smoking history (n/%) | ||||
| No | 26/92.86 | 29/96.67 | 38/90.48 | |
| Yes | 2/7.14 | 1/3.33 | 4/9.52 | 0.60 |
| HR-HPV subtype (n/%) | ||||
| Negative | 0/0 | 0/0 | 42/100 | |
| HPV-16 | 6*/21.43 | 3/10 | 0/0 | |
| HPV-18 | 4*/14.29 | 3/10 | 0/0 | |
| Others | 20#/71.43 | 24/80 | 0/0 | |
* One of the cases was infected with both HPV-16 and HPV-18
#One of the cases had persistent HPV-18 and HPV-58 infection
Fig. 1Microbial community structures of the P, C, and NC groups. A The microbial community bar plot of the three groups at the phyla level. B The microbial community bar plot of the three groups at the genus level. C OTU Venn diagram of the three groups. Different colors indicate various groups. The number in the overlapped area means the number of common OTUs of the groups
Fig. 2Box plot of the Chao1 index for the three groups. Each box plot represents one of the groups. The dark horizontal bar represents the median value of each group, while the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentile values
Fig. 3PCoA analysis of the P, C, and NC groups. NC samples are indicated in blue, P samples are in orange, and C samples are in red. The distance within the groups at the Pc1, Pc2, and Pc3 axes indicates the beta-diversity of the three groups
Fig. 4LEfSe analysis of the three groups. A A cladogram of the indicative taxa in the vaginal microbiota of the NC group compared to the other two groups. The point in the center represents the root of the tree (bacteria). The rings represent the taxonomic levels in descending order, from phylum to genus. The diameters of the circles represent the relative taxonomic abundances. B Histogram of the LDA scores of the taxa enriched in the NC group. The LDA scores indicate the effect sizes and rankings of the taxa with different relative abundance between the NC and P/C groups. (LDA, linear discriminant analysis)
Fig. 5The Wilcox rank-sum test of the NC, PO, PC, CO, and CC subgroups. The horizontal axis indicates different genus, and the vertical axis indicates the mean relative abundance of the genus. The bars in different colors represent different groups. (PC: persistent infection with subtype HPV16 or 18. PO: persistent infection with subtypes other than 16 and18. CC: clearance of subtype16 or18. CO: clearance of subtypes other than 16 and18. *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01)