| Literature DB >> 29304768 |
Ettore Palma1, Nadia Recine1, Lavinia Domenici2, Margherita Giorgini1, Alessandra Pierangeli3, Pierluigi Benedetti Panici1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over recent years, a growing interest has developed in microbiota and in the concept of maintaining a special balance between Lactobacillus and other bacteria species in order to promote women's well-being. The aim of our study was to confirm that vaginal Lactobacilli long-lasting implementation in women with HPV-infections and concomitant bacterial vaginosis or vaginitis might be able to help in solving the viral infection, by re-establishing the original eubiosis.Entities:
Keywords: HPV infection; Lactobacillus rhamnosus BMX 54; Probiotics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29304768 PMCID: PMC5756375 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2938-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Flow chart. t0: time of inclusion; t3, t6 and t9: follow up time at 3, 6 and 9 months respectively
Patients’ baseline characteristics
| VARIABLES | GROUP 1 ( | GROUP 2 ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD | 32.4 ± 10.5 | 29.1 ± 8.9 | NS |
| Use of contraceptive methods | 35 (58.3%) | 33 (57.8%) | NS |
| Regular menses | 47 (73.3%) | 48 (84.2%) | NS |
| Symptoms prevalence (vaginal itching and burning, dyspareunia and dysuria) | 53 (88.3%) | 49 (85.9%) | NS |
| Smoking | 25 (41.6%) | 19 (33.3%) | NS |
| Multiple partners | 5 (8.3%) | 6 (10.5%) | NS |
| Previous deliveries | 31 (51.6%) | 33 (57.9%) | NS |
| Bacterial vaginosis | 33 (55.0%) | 31 (54.4%) | NS |
| Yeast vaginitis | 27 (45.0%) | 26 (45.6%) | NS |
| Pap smear alterations | 40 (66.6%) | 39 (68.4%) | NS |
| Associated HPV DNA+ | 35 (58.3%) | 33 (57.8%) | |
| HPV DNA+ alone | 20 (33.3%) | 18 (31.6%) | NS |
| HPV DNA+ patients (total) | 55 (91.7%) | 51 (89.4%) | NS |
| HPV DNA negative patients with PAP smear abnormalities | 5 (8.3%) | 6 (10.5%) | NS |
NS not significant
Fig. 2Trend of HPV abnormalities resolution in the two groups (group 1 – short probiotics implementation group, n = 60; group 2 – long probiotics implementation group, n = 57; p = 0.041)
Fig. 3HPV clearance at the end of follow up period (t9) in the two groups (group 1 – short probiotics implementation group, n = 60; group 2 – long probiotics implementation group, n = 57). HPV clearance was significantly higher in long term probiotics users than in the other group (p = 0.044). t0: before treatment; t9: after 9 months follow up
Follow up characteristics
| GROUP 1 ( | GROUP 2 ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLLOW UP (months) | t0 | t3 | t6 | t9 | t0 | t3 | t6 | t9 |
| Bacterial infections (n, %) | 33 (55.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (3.3%) | 31 (54.4%) | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Yeast infections (n, %) | 27 (45.0%) | 3 (5.0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (11.6%) | 26 (45.6%) | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.7%) |
| PAP smear abnormalities (n, %) | 40 (66.6%) | 28 (46.6%) | – | 25 (41.6%) | 39 (68.4%) | 25 (43.8%) | – | 8 (14.0%) |
| HPV DNA+ (n, %) | 55 (91.7%) | – | – | 48 (80.0%) | 51 (89.4%) | – | – | 33 (57.8%) |
| Pathologic colposcopy findings (HPV DNA negative) (n, %) | 5 (8.3%) | 2 (3.3%) | 3 (5.0%) | 3 (5.0%) | 6 (10.5%) | 3 (5.2%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0 (0%) |