| Literature DB >> 34977053 |
Fujiao He1, Yaqin Wang1, Yun Xiu1, Yixin Zhang1, Lizhu Chen1.
Abstract
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology to medical imaging has resulted in great breakthroughs. Given the unique position of ultrasound (US) in prenatal screening, the research on AI in prenatal US has practical significance with its application to prenatal US diagnosis improving work efficiency, providing quantitative assessments, standardizing measurements, improving diagnostic accuracy, and automating image quality control. This review provides an overview of recent studies that have applied AI technology to prenatal US diagnosis and explains the challenges encountered in these applications.Entities:
Keywords: artificial intelligence; fetus; medical imaging; prenatal diagnosis; ultrasound
Year: 2021 PMID: 34977053 PMCID: PMC8716504 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.729978
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1A schematic diagram of this review AI, artificial intelligence; ML, machine learning; DL, deep learning; US, ultrasound; GS, gestational sac; NT, nuchal translucency; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference; FL, femur length; HL, humerus length; FINE, fetal intelligent navigation echocardiography.
Summary of studies about intelligent measurements of NT.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Lee et al. ( | Coherence-enhancing diffusion filter, Dynamic programming | Automatic measurement of NT with manual ROI | Correlation ca,m: 0.99 |
| Catanzariti et al. ( | Dynamic programming | Automatic measurement of NT with manual ROI | No quantitative analysis and perform better than Lee et al. ( |
| Deng et al. ( | SVM classifier, Gaussian pyramids | Automatic detection of the NT region in the standard mid-sagittal plane | Accuracy: 93.1% |
| Park et al. ( | Dijkstra's shortest path, Oriented gradient filters, Graph Cut segmentation, Hierarchical Detection Network | Automatic segmentation and measurement of NT in the standard mid-sagittal plane | The detection results are accurate for most cases |
| Siqing et al. ( | Dynamic programming, Hessian plate filter, Deep belief network | Automatic identification the mid-sagittal plane, detection, and measurement of NT | σ = 0.40, dNTlen = 0.28, dborder = 0.27 |
| Sciortino et al. ( | Wavelet, Multi resolution analysis | Automatic identification the mid-sagittal plane, detection, and measurement of NT | Sensitivity: 99.95% |
NT, nuchal translucency; ROI, region of interest; Correlation c.
Summary of studies about intelligent measurements of HC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foi et al. ( | Segmentation + Measurement | 2D | 21, 28, and 33 weeks | 90 | Nelder - Mead | 0.96 | |
| Zhang et al. ( | Detection + Segmentation + Measurement | 2D | 20–35 weeks | 41 (41) | 21 | Supervised texton + RF | 0.97 |
| Li et al. ( | Detection + Measurement | 2D | 18–33 weeks | 669 | 145 | RF + Ellifit | 0.97 |
| Sinclair et al. ( | Detection + Measurement | 2D | 18–22 weeks | 2,703 (2724) | 539 | CNN | 0.98 |
| Vandenheuvel et al. ( | Detection + Measurement + Gestation | 2D | All trimesters | 1,334 (551) | 333 | CNN + U-net | 0.97 |
| Kim et al. ( | Detection + Measurement + Checking | 2D | 172 | 70 | U-Net + CNNs + Ellifit | 0.95 | |
| Sobhaninia et al. ( | Segmentation + Measurement | 2D | All trimesters | 999 | 250 | CNN + U-net | 0.97 |
| Li et al. ( | Segmentation + Measurement | 2D | All trimesters | 1,334 (551) | 335 | CNN | 0.97 |
HC, head circumference; GA, gestational age; Dice, a parameter describing the similarity between the performance of proposed method and the ground truth; 2D, two dimensional; RF, random forests; CNN, convolutional neural network.
Summary of studies about intelligent measurements of AC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. ( | Detection+Measurement | HT+local phase | 590 | 18–39 weeks | Measurement: MSD 0.42%; |
| Jang et al. ( | Classification+Measurement+Checking | CNN+HT | 88 | Measurement: Dice 0.85; | |
| Kim et al. ( | Detection+Measurement+Checking | CNN+U-net | 174 | Measurement: Dice 0.93; |
AC, abdominal circumference; GA, gestational age; HT, Hough transform; MSD, mean sign difference; SD, standard deviation; P value, help to further assess the statistical evidence; CNN, convolutional neural network; Dice, a parameter describing the similarity between the performance of proposed method and the ground truth.
Summary of studies about intelligent measurements of FL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaqub et al. ( | Segmentation | RF | 3D | 13–25 weeks | 51 | Segmentation: precision 87.0%; recall 82.0%; Dice 0.83 |
| Hur et al. ( | Reconstruction + Measurements | 3D | 26–32 weeks | 39 | Measurement: successful rates for femur, tibia and fibula length are 96.1, 80.7, and 76.9% | |
| Zhang et al. ( | Segmentation + Measurement | Supervised texton + RF | 2D | 20, 21, 28, 34, 35 weeks | 30 | Measurement: accuracy 99.8%; precision 77.6%; recall 95.2%; specificity 99.8%; Dice 0.86 |
| Luo et al. ( | Segmentation + Measurement | Frangi filter | 2D | 18–27 weeks | 70 | Measurement: precision 57.5%; recall 85.3%; specificity 99.8%; Dice 0.73 |
FL, femur length; GA, gestational age; RF, random forests; 2D, two dimensional; 3D, three dimensional; Dice, a parameter describing the similarity between the performance of the proposed method and the ground truth.