Literature DB >> 30573305

Automated Fetal Head Detection and Circumference Estimation from Free-Hand Ultrasound Sweeps Using Deep Learning in Resource-Limited Countries.

Thomas L A van den Heuvel1, Hezkiel Petros2, Stefano Santini2, Chris L de Korte3, Bram van Ginneken4.   

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging remains out of reach for most pregnant women in developing countries because it requires a trained sonographer to acquire and interpret the images. We address this problem by presenting a system that can automatically estimate the fetal head circumference (HC) from data obtained with use of the obstetric sweep protocol (OSP). The OSP consists of multiple pre-defined sweeps with the ultrasound transducer over the abdomen of the pregnant woman. The OSP can be taught within a day to any health care worker without prior knowledge of ultrasound. An experienced sonographer acquired both the standard plane-to obtain the reference HC-and the OSP from 183 pregnant women in St. Luke's Hospital, Wolisso, Ethiopia. The OSP data, which will most likely not contain the standard plane, was used to automatically estimate HC using two fully convolutional neural networks. First, a VGG-Net-inspired network was trained to automatically detect the frames that contained the fetal head. Second, a U-net-inspired network was trained to automatically measure the HC for all frames in which the first network detected a fetal head. The HC was estimated from these frame measurements, and the curve of Hadlock was used to determine gestational age (GA). The results indicated that most automatically estimated GAs fell within the P2.5-P97.5 interval of the Hadlock curve compared with the GAs obtained from the reference HC, so it is possible to automatically estimate GA from OSP data. Our method therefore has potential application for providing maternal care in resource-constrained countries.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided detection and diagnosis; Fetus; Machine learning; Neural network; Obstetric Sweep Protocol; Prenatal; Resource-limited countries; Segmentation; Ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 30573305     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  10 in total

1.  An automated framework for image classification and segmentation of fetal ultrasound images for gestational age estimation.

Authors:  Juan C Prieto; Hina Shah; Alan J Rosenbaum; Xiaoning Jiang; Patrick Musonda; Joan T Price; Elizabeth M Stringer; Bellington Vwalika; David M Stamilio; Jeffrey S A Stringer
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis.

Authors:  Fujiao He; Yaqin Wang; Yun Xiu; Yixin Zhang; Lizhu Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-16

3.  Estimated date of delivery with electronic medical records by a hybrid GBDT-GRU model.

Authors:  Yina Wu; Yichao Zhang; Xu Zou; Zhenming Yuan; Wensheng Hu; Sha Lu; Xiaoyan Sun; Yingfei Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  No sonographer, no radiologist: New system for automatic prenatal detection of fetal biometry, fetal presentation, and placental location.

Authors:  Junior Arroyo; Thomas J Marini; Ana C Saavedra; Marika Toscano; Timothy M Baran; Kathryn Drennan; Ann Dozier; Yu Tina Zhao; Miguel Egoavil; Lorena Tamayo; Berta Ramos; Benjamin Castaneda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Potential for Use of Portable Ultrasound Devices in Rural and Remote Settings in Australia and Other Developed Countries: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liam Shaddock; Tony Smith
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2022-03-29

6.  Developing Clinical Artificial Intelligence for Obstetric Ultrasound to Improve Access in Underserved Regions: Protocol for a Computer-Assisted Low-Cost Point-of-Care UltraSound (CALOPUS) Study.

Authors:  Shinjini Bhatnagar; Aris T Papageorghiou; J Alison Noble; Alice Self; Qingchao Chen; Bapu Koundinya Desiraju; Sumeet Dhariwal; Alexander D Gleed; Divyanshu Mishra; Ramachandran Thiruvengadam; Varun Chandramohan; Rachel Craik; Elizabeth Wilden; Ashok Khurana
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-09-01

7.  A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment.

Authors:  Ryan G Gomes; Bellington Vwalika; Chace Lee; Angelica Willis; Marcin Sieniek; Joan T Price; Christina Chen; Margaret P Kasaro; James A Taylor; Elizabeth M Stringer; Scott Mayer McKinney; Ntazana Sindano; George E Dahl; William Goodnight; Justin Gilmer; Benjamin H Chi; Charles Lau; Terry Spitz; T Saensuksopa; Kris Liu; Tiya Tiyasirichokchai; Jonny Wong; Rory Pilgrim; Akib Uddin; Greg Corrado; Lily Peng; Katherine Chou; Daniel Tse; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Shravya Shetty
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-11

8.  Recognition of Thyroid Ultrasound Standard Plane Images Based on Residual Network.

Authors:  Minghui Guo; Kangjian Wang; Shunlan Liu; Yongzhao Du; Peizhong Liu; Qichen Su; Guorong Lv
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-02

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence and the future of global health.

Authors:  Nina Schwalbe; Brian Wahl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Towards Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Masaaki Komatsu; Akira Sakai; Ai Dozen; Kanto Shozu; Suguru Yasutomi; Hidenori Machino; Ken Asada; Syuzo Kaneko; Ryuji Hamamoto
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-06-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.