Literature DB >> 34969314

Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based App for the Longitudinal Assessment of Anxiety in Daily Life.

Lydia Fortea1,2,3, Miquel Tortella-Feliu4, Asier Juaneda-Seguí2,3,5, Víctor De la Peña-Arteaga3,5, Pamela Chavarría-Elizondo2,3,5, Laia Prat-Torres5, Carles Soriano-Mas2,5,6, Sean P Lane7, Joaquim Radua1,2,8,9, Miquel A Fullana1,2,10.   

Abstract

Current methods to assess human anxiety often ignore that anxiety is a dynamic process and have limitations such as high recall bias and low generalizability to real life. Smartphone apps using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) may overcome such limitations. We developed a smartphone app for the longitudinal evaluation of anxiety symptoms using EMA. We assessed the feasibility (retention and compliance) and psychometric properties (reliability and validity) of the app over 6 months in a sample of 99 participants with different levels of anxiety. The EMA-based smartphone app was highly feasible. It showed excellent within-person and between-person reliability, high convergent and moderate discriminant validity, and significant incremental validity. Assessing anxiety longitudinally using a smartphone and following EMA principles is feasible and can be reliable and valid. Studies combining EMA-based anxiety longitudinal assessments with other assessment methods deserve further research and may offer novel insights into human anxiety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anxiety; app; ecological momentary assessment; psychometrics; smartphone

Year:  2021        PMID: 34969314      PMCID: PMC9301625          DOI: 10.1177/10731911211065166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  32 in total

Review 1.  Incremental validity of new clinical assessment measures.

Authors:  Stephen N Haynes; Heather C Lench
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Compliance with momentary pain measurement using electronic diaries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mattijn Morren; Sandra van Dulmen; Jessika Ouwerkerk; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 3.  How is affective instability defined and measured? A systematic review.

Authors:  S Marwaha; Z He; M Broome; S P Singh; J Scott; J Eyden; D Wolke
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?

Authors:  James A Cranford; Patrick E Shrout; Masumi Iida; Eshkol Rafaeli; Tiffany Yip; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07

Review 5.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders.

Authors:  S Mineka; D Watson; L A Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 7.  A systematic review of the psychometric properties, usability and clinical impacts of mobile mood-monitoring applications in young people.

Authors:  M Dubad; C Winsper; C Meyer; M Livanou; S Marwaha
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 8.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Clinical assessment of affective instability: comparing EMA indices, questionnaire reports, and retrospective recall.

Authors:  Marika B Solhan; Timothy J Trull; Seungmin Jahng; Phillip K Wood
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2009-09

10.  Compliance With Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocols in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cheng K Fred Wen; Stefan Schneider; Arthur A Stone; Donna Spruijt-Metz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.