M Dubad1, C Winsper1, C Meyer1, M Livanou1, S Marwaha1. 1. Mental Health and Wellbeing, Division of Health Sciences,Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick,Coventry,UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mobile mood-monitoring applications are increasingly used by mental health providers, widely advocated within research, and a potentially effective method to engage young people. However, little is known about their efficacy and usability in young populations. METHOD: A systematic review addressing three research questions focused on young people: (1) what are the psychometric properties of mobile mood-monitoring applications; (2) what is their usability; and (3) what are their positive and negative clinical impacts? Findings were synthesised narratively, study quality assessed and compared with evidence from adult studies. RESULTS: We reviewed 25 articles. Studies on the psychometric properties of mobile mood-monitoring applications were sparse, but indicate questionable to excellent internal consistency, moderate concurrent validity and good usability. Participation rates ranged from 30% to 99% across studies, and appeared to be affected by methodological factors (e.g. payments) and individual characteristics (e.g. IQ score). Mobile mood-monitoring applications are positively perceived by youth, may reduce depressive symptoms by increasing emotional awareness, and could aid in the detection of mental health and substance use problems. There was very limited evidence on potential negative impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the use of mood-monitoring applications in youth is promising but limited due to a lack of high-quality studies. Future work should explicate the effects of mobile mood-monitoring applications on effective self-regulation, clinical outcomes across disorders and young people's engagement with mental health services. Potential negative impacts in this population should also be investigated, as the adult literature suggests that application use could potentially increase negativity and depression symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Mobile mood-monitoring applications are increasingly used by mental health providers, widely advocated within research, and a potentially effective method to engage young people. However, little is known about their efficacy and usability in young populations. METHOD: A systematic review addressing three research questions focused on young people: (1) what are the psychometric properties of mobile mood-monitoring applications; (2) what is their usability; and (3) what are their positive and negative clinical impacts? Findings were synthesised narratively, study quality assessed and compared with evidence from adult studies. RESULTS: We reviewed 25 articles. Studies on the psychometric properties of mobile mood-monitoring applications were sparse, but indicate questionable to excellent internal consistency, moderate concurrent validity and good usability. Participation rates ranged from 30% to 99% across studies, and appeared to be affected by methodological factors (e.g. payments) and individual characteristics (e.g. IQ score). Mobile mood-monitoring applications are positively perceived by youth, may reduce depressive symptoms by increasing emotional awareness, and could aid in the detection of mental health and substance use problems. There was very limited evidence on potential negative impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the use of mood-monitoring applications in youth is promising but limited due to a lack of high-quality studies. Future work should explicate the effects of mobile mood-monitoring applications on effective self-regulation, clinical outcomes across disorders and young people's engagement with mental health services. Potential negative impacts in this population should also be investigated, as the adult literature suggests that application use could potentially increase negativity and depression symptoms.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ecological momentary assessment; mental health; mhealth; mobile application; mood; mood monitoring; young people
Authors: Ricardo F Muñoz; Denise A Chavira; Joseph A Himle; Kelly Koerner; Jordana Muroff; Julia Reynolds; Raphael D Rose; Josef I Ruzek; Bethany A Teachman; Stephen M Schueller Journal: Mhealth Date: 2018-06-04
Authors: Zhe He; Shubo Tian; Ankita Singh; Shayok Chakraborty; Shenghao Zhang; Mia Liza A Lustria; Neil Charness; Nelson A Roque; Erin R Harrell; Walter R Boot Journal: Inf Process Manag Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 7.466
Authors: Lydia Fortea; Miquel Tortella-Feliu; Asier Juaneda-Seguí; Víctor De la Peña-Arteaga; Pamela Chavarría-Elizondo; Laia Prat-Torres; Carles Soriano-Mas; Sean P Lane; Joaquim Radua; Miquel A Fullana Journal: Assessment Date: 2021-12-30
Authors: Caroline S Kampshoff; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Martijn G van Oijen; Mirjam A Sprangers; Laurien M Buffart Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Martina Di Simplicio; Elizabeth Appiah-Kusi; Paul Wilkinson; Peter Watson; Caroline Meiser-Stedman; David J Kavanagh; Emily A Holmes Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2020-02-14
Authors: Elizabeth C Harris; Christine A Conelea; Michael T Shyne; Gail A Bernstein Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 2.576