Literature DB >> 3496862

Gastrointestinal anastomoses. Factors affecting early complications.

R K Jex, J A van Heerden, B G Wolff, R L Ready, D M Ilstrup.   

Abstract

A retrospective review of gastric and colonic anastomoses during a recent 12-month period was performed at the Mayo Clinic. One hundred sixty-nine patients had gastroduodenal or gastrojejunal anastomoses (Group I). Five hundred nineteen patients had ileocolonic or ileorectal (222) and colocolonic or colorectal (297) anastomoses (Group II). Major anastomotic complication rates for Group I patients were: leaks, 1%; hemorrhage, 2%; and stenosis or obstruction, 2%. Reoperations and deaths secondary to anastomotic complications during the postoperative period were 2% and 0.6%, respectively. Corresponding rates for Group II were 2%, 1%, and 4%, with reoperative and anastomotic death rates of 1% and 0.2%, respectively. In Group I patients, length of operation had a significant effect (p less than 0.01) on anastomotic complications. In Group II patients, a significant increase in complications was related to the presence of obstruction (p less than 0.001), recent weight loss (greater than 10 pounds) (p less than 0.02), malignancy (p less than 0.04), and sepsis (p less than 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3496862      PMCID: PMC1493099          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198708000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  13 in total

1.  A controlled comparison one- and two-layer techniques of suture for high and low colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  J C Goligher; P W Lee; K C Simpkins; D J Lintott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Factor contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  T R Schrock; C W Deveney; J E Dunphy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  New techniques of gastrointestinal anastomoses with the EEA stapler.

Authors:  F C Nance
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A controlled trial of inverting versus everting intestinal suture in clinical large-bowel surgery.

Authors:  J C Goligher; C Morris; W A McAdam; F T De Dombal; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Anastomotic leakage after low colonic anastomosis. Clinical and experimental aspects.

Authors:  L Morgenstern; T Yamakawa; M Ben-Shoshan; H Lippman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  A critical review of colectomy with anastomosis.

Authors:  H T Debas; F B Thomson
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1972-11

7.  Anastomotic dehiscence after low anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  J Sharefkin; N Joffe; W Silen; D Fromm
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  R W Beart; K A Kelly
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study.

Authors:  L P Fielding; S Stewart-Brown; L Blesovsky; G Kearney
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-09

10.  Infectious complications of the abdomen following gastric operations.

Authors:  O Jansson; L Lundell; A Thulin
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1983-02
View more
  22 in total

1.  A novel colonic anastomosis technique involving fixed polyglycolic acid mesh.

Authors:  Erhan Aysan; Hasan Bektas; Feyzullah Ersoz; Serkan Sari; Arslan Kaygusuz
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2010-10-24

2.  Selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibition increases breaking strength and reduces anastomotic leakage in experimentally obstructed colon.

Authors:  Peter-Martin Krarup; Mikkel Eld; Lars Nannestad Jorgensen; Mark Berner Hansen; Magnus S Ågren
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  GM6001 Increases Anastomotic Leakage following Colonic Obstruction Possibly by Impeding Epithelialization.

Authors:  Martin Rehn; Peter-Martin Krarup; Lise H Christensen; Jakob B Seidelin; Magnus S Ågren; Ingvar Syk
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  Sutureless colonic anastomoses.

Authors:  B Zederfeldt; H Jiborn; G Ekelund
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1990

5.  Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it's later than you think.

Authors:  Neil Hyman; Thomas L Manchester; Turner Osler; Betsy Burns; Peter A Cataldo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Early postoperative anastomotic hemorrhage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Tokunaga; Hiroyuki Ono; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Effects of melatonin on colonic anastomosis healing following chemotherapy in rats.

Authors:  Cebrail Akyuz; Necdet Fatih Yasar; Orhan Uzun; Kıvanc Derya Peker; Oguzhan Sunamak; Mustafa Duman; Ahmet Ozer Sehirli; Sinan Yol
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Rapid morphological changes and loss of collagen following experimental acute colonic obstruction.

Authors:  Peter-Martin Krarup; Martin Rehn; Janna Sand-Dejmek; Roy Ehrnström; Magnus S Ågren; Ingvar Syk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  More is better. Antibiotic management after hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  D H Livingston; C R Shumate; H C Polk; M A Malangoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Duodenojejunostomy leaks after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Keith D Lillemoe; Kurtis A Campbell; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.