Keitaro Matsukawa1, Yuichiro Abe2, Ralph Jasper Mobbs3,4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wajokai Eniwa Hospital, Eniwa, Japan. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia. 4. NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Level 7, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screw technique is becoming popular for sacropelvic fixation. However, appropriately placing SAI screws is technically demanding because of a narrow safe corridor and the risk of neurovascular/visceral injuries. Recently, a three-dimensional patient-specific template guiding technique for pedicle screw placement has been considered a promising method to improve accuracy and safety. The objective of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of SAI screw placement with a patient-specific template guide using cadaveric and prospective clinical pilot studies. METHODS: Three-dimensional planning of SAI screw placement, including entry point, screw trajectory, length, and diameter, was performed using a computer simulation software. Then, three-dimensional printed patient-specific template guides were created based on the plan. Firstly, a total of 12 SAI screws were placed for 6 cadaveric specimens using the guides. Next, in a prospective clinical trial, a total of 20 SAI screws were placed for 10 consecutively enrolled patients. The safety and accuracy of screw placement were analyzed using postoperative computed tomography by the evaluation of any cortical breach and measurement of screw deviations between the planned and actual screw positions. RESULTS: All the screws showed no perforation. In the cadaveric study, the mean horizontal and vertical deviations from the planned screw position at the entry point were 1.40±1.21 mm and 1.34±1.09 mm, respectively. The mean angular deviations in the sagittal and transverse planes were 1.68°±1.24° and 1.53°±1.06°, respectively. The results of the clinical study showed comparable accuracy with those of the cadaveric study, except for the vertical deviation at the entry point (p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using a patient-specific template guide for SAI screw placement. This technique could become an effective solution to achieve accurate screw placement.
INTRODUCTION: The sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screw technique is becoming popular for sacropelvic fixation. However, appropriately placing SAI screws is technically demanding because of a narrow safe corridor and the risk of neurovascular/visceral injuries. Recently, a three-dimensional patient-specific template guiding technique for pedicle screw placement has been considered a promising method to improve accuracy and safety. The objective of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of SAI screw placement with a patient-specific template guide using cadaveric and prospective clinical pilot studies. METHODS: Three-dimensional planning of SAI screw placement, including entry point, screw trajectory, length, and diameter, was performed using a computer simulation software. Then, three-dimensional printed patient-specific template guides were created based on the plan. Firstly, a total of 12 SAI screws were placed for 6 cadaveric specimens using the guides. Next, in a prospective clinical trial, a total of 20 SAI screws were placed for 10 consecutively enrolled patients. The safety and accuracy of screw placement were analyzed using postoperative computed tomography by the evaluation of any cortical breach and measurement of screw deviations between the planned and actual screw positions. RESULTS: All the screws showed no perforation. In the cadaveric study, the mean horizontal and vertical deviations from the planned screw position at the entry point were 1.40±1.21 mm and 1.34±1.09 mm, respectively. The mean angular deviations in the sagittal and transverse planes were 1.68°±1.24° and 1.53°±1.06°, respectively. The results of the clinical study showed comparable accuracy with those of the cadaveric study, except for the vertical deviation at the entry point (p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using a patient-specific template guide for SAI screw placement. This technique could become an effective solution to achieve accurate screw placement.
Authors: K Radermacher; F Portheine; M Anton; A Zimolong; G Kaspers; G Rau; H W Staudte Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Jamal N Shillingford; Joseph L Laratta; Lee A Tan; Nana O Sarpong; James D Lin; Charla R Fischer; Ronald A Lehman; Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: T R Kuklo; K H Bridwell; S J Lewis; C Baldus; K Blanke; T M Iffrig; L G Lenke Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2001-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Sheng Lu; Yong Q Xu; William W Lu; Guo X Ni; Yan B Li; Ji H Shi; Dong P Li; Guo P Chen; Yu B Chen; Yuan Z Zhang Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Joseph R O'Brien; Warren D Yu; Rishi Bhatnagar; Paul Sponseller; Khaled M Kebaish Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 3.468